Revise the BPR (BPR/PT/192/00) against the change ...
Criado em: 7 de agosto de 2026
Respondido usando GPT-5.6 Thinking por Chat01
Pergunta
Attchment-I...docx
BPR_PT_192_00_260805_151133.pdf
17005765 - 00 - GVITHER PLUS 80480 TAB 10X1X6 WHO P3.pdf
BPR 17005949.docx
MFR.PT.063.07_260512_175733.pdf
Revise the BPR (BPR/PT/192/00) against the change comparison sheet provided and according to the current format of the BPR (Reference format is provided). Check the parameters from existing BPR (BPR/PT/192/00) and put into the new revised BPR also check the packing material and accordingly make the necessary adjustments/instructions/ required table/impacted pages in the BPR.
Also, for foil/embossing details and carton overprinting refer existing BPR or MPD provided (use plant 1500 information). Also, I provided the MFR of product if any information needed you can take like label claim, storage conditions etc.
Revised BPR Number should be BPR/PT/192/01 n do not change the formatting of BPR, it should be like reference format given of 17005949 FG code. Replace the contents from 17005949 n add he other details from references n provide output
Pensamento
Resposta
Completed the revised BPR/PT/192/01 for GVITHER PLUS 80/480 TABLETS in the current 17005949 BPR format. The document retains the 70-page reference-format structure, incorporates the SAP S4 equipment-ID changes and blister-area DP limit of 10-25 Pa from the change sheet, (Attchment-I...docx) (Attchment-I...docx) and uses the Plant 1500 foil/embossing, carton/outer-carton overprinting, pharmacode, packing configuration, and shipper requirements from the MPD. (17005765 - 00 - GVITHER PLUS 80480 TAB 10X1X6 WHO P3.pdf) The current BPR section/index structure was retained from the 17005949 reference format. (BPR 17005949.docx)
I also carried over the applicable existing BPR packing parameters and adjusted the BOM, primary/secondary packing instructions, IPC tables, equipment tables, foil details, carton tables, reconciliation tables, and revision history. Product label/storage information was aligned with the supplied MFR. (MFR.PT.063.07_260512_175733.pdf) I did not invent unsupported master-data fields: Effective Date, Semi-Finished Good Code, exact approved hold-time days/protocol, and standard empty-blister weight remain blank/controlled placeholders for QA/master-data completion.