For the annual bonus in BCG, it depends on the ove...

Question

For the annual bonus in BCG, it depends on the overall BCG Great China performance a lot, and I believe this year it will be higher since the overall business is getting better. (我个人的绩效每年评分都是2分, 5 分制，1分最好)

But anyway it easier to explain based on last year's base, so let's use the number I provided to you.

以上的内容，帮我做一个英文润色

Thought

Polishing English content

The user asked for some polished English. They gave text in both English and Chinese, asking for a refined version. My goal is to make the content more formal and fluent, without changing the meaning. I'll create two versions: one brief and professional, and another more detailed.

Polishing text for email

The user provides information in mixed English and Chinese, asking for a polished version. The goal is to smoothly integrate the details and fix terms like "Great China" to "Greater China." I’ll offer three options: one professional, one concise, and one casual, all while keeping the descriptions brief and appropriate for an email.

Polishing text with clarity

The user provided a sentence about their performance rating and how it’s been consistent. My task is to make the text clearer and more formal while keeping context. I’ll keep it simple and avoid unnecessary details. I'll offer a refined version like: “It’s easier to explain using last year’s baseline, so let

Thought for 9s

Answer

Here are two polished versions—pick the tone you prefer:

Professional

The annual bonus at BCG is largely tied to the performance of BCG Greater China. As the business has been improving, I expect this year’s bonus to be higher. For context, my individual performance rating has consistently been 2 on a 1–5 scale (with 1 being the highest). That said, it’s simpler to explain using last year’s baseline, so let’s use the figures I provided.

Concise

BCG’s annual bonus depends heavily on BCG Greater China’s performance. With business improving, I expect a higher bonus this year. My performance rating has consistently been 2 out of 5 (1 is best). For clarity, let’s base our discussion on last year’s numbers I shared.