Problem Description Amazon needs to distribute pri...

Created on: August 11, 2025

Answered using GPT-5 by Chat01

Question

Problem Description
Amazon needs to distribute prizes to participants in a challenge based on their scores, following these rules:

Participants with the same score must receive prizes with the same value.

Participants with higher scores must receive prizes with higher values than those with lower scores.

Given:

An array points where points[i] is the score of the ith participant

An array values representing the available prize values

Determine the prize value each participant will receive. If multiple distributions are possible, return the lexicographically smallest one.

An array A is lexicographically smaller than array B if at the first index where they differ, A has a smaller value, or if A is a prefix of B.

Examples
Example 1
Input:

points = [2, 3, 4]

values = [2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Possible distributions:

[2, 3, 4] (Fair)

[4, 2, 2] (Unfair - violates rule 2)

Output: [2, 3, 4]

Example 2
Input:

points = [6, 5, 1, 2]

values = [3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 2, 2]

Possible distributions:

[4, 3, 2, 3] (Fair)

[4, 2, 2, 2] (Unfair - violates rule 2)

[3, 4, 3, 4] (Unfair - violates rule 1)

Output: [4, 3, 2, 3]

Provide 100% java function inly solution where vales ,points and return type is list(integers) consider all the edge test cases before answering

Thought

Designing prize distribution function

I need to create a Java function that distributes prizes based on participants' scores. The function accepts two lists: points (scores) and values (available prizes), and returns a list of assigned prizes. The assignment must be lexicographically smallest and follow rules like ensuring higher scores receive higher prizes, with exact counts assigned for each score.

Clarifying prize assignment rules

If participants have the same score, they must be assigned the same prize. For each unique score, we should pick a prize value from the available list that satisfies the required frequency for that score's participant count. Additionally, prize values must strictly increase with score levels, so no two scores can share the same prize.

Minimizing lexicographically

To ensure the smallest lexicographic assignment, each participant's prize should be assigned based on their position, starting with the earliest one. For each score group, the smallest feasible value should be allocated while leaving room for higher scores to get bigger prizes. This requires balancing constraints for each score group.

Mapping scores to values

We need to pick distinct prize values for each score group, ensuring that the frequency of each prize meets the participant counts per score. To achieve a lexicographically minimal assignment, we must ensure that higher score groups receive progressively higher value prizes. The challenge is choosing values from the multiset in a way that maintains this mapping while considering the order of appearance.

Greedy lexicographic assignment

To ensure the lexicographically smallest output, we must assign prizes based on score levels while respecting the monotone constraint. For each score group, we greedily select the smallest feasible prize. This process involves checking feasibility by considering bounds from neighboring assigned groups and ensuring all groups can be matched with available prizes. This requires iterating through the scores and verifying constraints at each step.

Thought for 1m 18s

Answer

java
import java.util.*; public static List<Integer> assignPrizes(List<Integer> points, List<Integer> values) { int n = points.size(); // Count participants per distinct score (sorted ascending) TreeMap<Integer, Integer> scoreCount = new TreeMap<>(); for (int p : points) scoreCount.merge(p, 1, Integer::sum); int m = scoreCount.size(); // Available prize values with multiplicities (sorted) TreeMap<Integer, Integer> avail = new TreeMap<>(); for (int v : values) avail.merge(v, 1, Integer::sum); // Quick impossibility checks int totalNeeded = n; int totalAvail = values.size(); if (totalAvail < totalNeeded) return Collections.emptyList(); // not enough prizes at all if (m > avail.size()) { // need m strictly increasing prize values; if fewer distinct values exist than groups, impossible // (even if counts are large) // Still could be possible if some values have 0 after consumption? No—distinct strictly increasing values required. // So return empty. return Collections.emptyList(); } // Map scores to their index and required counts int idx = 0; int[] sizes = new int[m]; int[] scoresByIdx = new int[m]; Map<Integer, Integer> scoreToIdx = new HashMap<>(); for (Map.Entry<Integer, Integer> e : scoreCount.entrySet()) { scoresByIdx[idx] = e.getKey(); sizes[idx] = e.getValue(); scoreToIdx.put(e.getKey(), idx); idx++; } // Assigned prize value per score index (null if unassigned) Integer[] assigned = new Integer[m]; // Helper to reduce count in a TreeMap (remove key if zero) final class Util { void dec(TreeMap<Integer,Integer> tm, int key, int by) { int left = tm.getOrDefault(key, 0) - by; if (left < 0) throw new IllegalStateException("negative stock"); if (left == 0) tm.remove(key); else tm.put(key, left); } Integer nextKeyAtLeast(TreeMap<Integer,Integer> tm, int atLeast) { return tm.ceilingKey(atLeast); } } Util util = new Util(); // Greedy feasibility check for remaining groups given current (and tentative) availability & assignments. // Tries to assign the smallest possible valid value to each remaining group in increasing score order. java.util.function.BiFunction<TreeMap<Integer,Integer>, Integer[], Boolean> feasible = (stock, assignedNow) -> { int prev = Integer.MIN_VALUE; // last assigned value // Iterate groups in ascending score order for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) { Integer fixed = assignedNow[i]; // Determine upper bound from the next higher already-assigned group (if any) int ub = Integer.MAX_VALUE; for (int j = i + 1; j < m; j++) { if (assignedNow[j] != null) { ub = assignedNow[j]; break; } } if (fixed != null) { if (fixed <= prev || fixed >= ub) return false; // violates strictly increasing order prev = fixed; continue; } // Need to pick the smallest value >= prev+1 and < ub with enough copies Integer cand = stock.ceilingKey(prev == Integer.MIN_VALUE ? Integer.MIN_VALUE : prev + 1); while (cand != null && cand < ub) { int have = stock.get(cand); if (have >= sizes[i]) { // consume for feasibility check int left = have - sizes[i]; if (left == 0) stock.remove(cand); else stock.put(cand, left); prev = cand; // move on to next group break; } cand = stock.higherKey(cand); } if (cand == null || cand >= ub) return false; // none fits } return true; }; // Iterate original indices to ensure lexicographically smallest output for (int pos = 0; pos < n; pos++) { int s = points.get(pos); int k = scoreToIdx.get(s); if (assigned[k] != null) continue; // already fixed for this score group // Bounds from neighbors already assigned int lb = Integer.MIN_VALUE; // strictly greater than lb for (int i2 = k - 1; i2 >= 0; i2--) { if (assigned[i2] != null) { lb = assigned[i2]; break; } } int ub = Integer.MAX_VALUE; // strictly less than ub for (int i2 = k + 1; i2 < m; i2++) { if (assigned[i2] != null) { ub = assigned[i2]; break; } } // Try candidate prize values from smallest upward within (lb, ub) Integer cand = avail.ceilingKey(lb == Integer.MIN_VALUE ? Integer.MIN_VALUE : lb + 1); boolean placed = false; while (cand != null && cand < ub) { int have = avail.get(cand); if (have >= sizes[k]) { // Tentatively assign and check feasibility for all remaining groups TreeMap<Integer,Integer> stockCopy = new TreeMap<>(avail); // consume for current tentative int left = have - sizes[k]; if (left == 0) stockCopy.remove(cand); else stockCopy.put(cand, left); Integer[] assignedTemp = assigned.clone(); assignedTemp[k] = cand; if (feasible.apply(stockCopy, assignedTemp)) { // Commit assigned[k] = cand; if (left == 0) avail.remove(cand); else avail.put(cand, left); placed = true; break; } } cand = avail.higherKey(cand == null ? Integer.MIN_VALUE : cand); } if (!placed) { // No valid assignment possible return Collections.emptyList(); } } // Build output for each participant in original order Map<Integer,Integer> scoreToValue = new HashMap<>(); for (int i2 = 0; i2 < m; i2++) scoreToValue.put(scoresByIdx[i2], assigned[i2]); List<Integer> out = new ArrayList<>(n); for (int p : points) out.add(scoreToValue.get(p)); return out; }

Question

Can you make this code shorter and simpler where logic is same

Thought

Simplifying prize assignment logic

I’m thinking we need to simplify the Java function that assigns prizes. To preserve lexicographically smallest results, I could just sort the unique scores and assign them to groups. But, the trick is doing it in a way that still respects the participant order, while minimizing complexity through feasibility checks.

Ensuring fairness and lexicographic order

The goal here is to assign prizes fairly, making sure each score group gets strictly increasing values. To keep things lexicographically smallest, we should assign values to groups based on their first occurrence, always choosing the smallest available value consistent with the increasing order. This seems like a greedy approach with feasibility checks. It would go through the groups, ensuring there’s enough capacity to meet each group's size requirements. But does this guarantee the smallest lexicographical answer when participants are considered in order?

Lexicographical smallest mapping with feasibility

The current approach needs to ensure the group order respects score increases, but the first occurrence order might not directly align with that. The earlier code checked feasibility heavily. I’m thinking a dynamic approach could work—assign values while respecting previous neighboring constraints and trying to minimize the remaining in ascending order. This approach seems to align with what was attempted in the earlier code.

Simplifying the code

I think I can tidy up the code by using arrays and counts with a greedy helper function to assign values. Instead of iterating through multiple bounds, I'll scan for the smallest value to meet the requirements. The approach will involve counting group sizes, building arrays of scores and sizes, and checking if distinct values are sufficient. I'll then retain the first occurrence order for each group.

Thought for 18s

Answer

java
import java.util.*; public static List<Integer> assignPrizes(List<Integer> points, List<Integer> values) { int n = points.size(); if (n == 0) return Collections.emptyList(); // Count participants per distinct score (ascending by score) TreeMap<Integer,Integer> scoreCnt = new TreeMap<>(); for (int p : points) scoreCnt.merge(p, 1, Integer::sum); int m = scoreCnt.size(); int[] scores = new int[m], sizes = new int[m]; Map<Integer,Integer> scoreToIdx = new HashMap<>(); int t = 0; for (Map.Entry<Integer,Integer> e : scoreCnt.entrySet()) { scores[t] = e.getKey(); sizes[t] = e.getValue(); scoreToIdx.put(e.getKey(), t++); } // Available prize values with multiplicity TreeMap<Integer,Integer> stock = new TreeMap<>(); for (int v : values) stock.merge(v, 1, Integer::sum); // Quick impossibility checks if (values.size() < n) return Collections.emptyList(); if (stock.size() < m) return Collections.emptyList(); // need m distinct prize values // Order groups by first appearance in the original points array (lexicographic requirement) int[] firstPos = new int[m]; Arrays.fill(firstPos, Integer.MAX_VALUE); for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { int gi = scoreToIdx.get(points.get(i)); if (firstPos[gi] == Integer.MAX_VALUE) firstPos[gi] = i; } Integer[] groupOrder = new Integer[m]; for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) groupOrder[i] = i; Arrays.sort(groupOrder, Comparator.comparingInt(i -> firstPos[i])); Integer[] assigned = new Integer[m]; // prize value per score group (by ascending score index) // Feasibility: given partial 'assigned' and a stock snapshot, can we fill the rest greedily? java.util.function.BiFunction<Integer[], TreeMap<Integer,Integer>, Boolean> canFinish = (fix, inv) -> { int prev = Integer.MIN_VALUE; for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) { // upper bound is the next already-fixed group's value (must be strictly less than it) int ub = Integer.MAX_VALUE; for (int j = i + 1; j < m; j++) if (fix[j] != null) { ub = fix[j]; break; } if (fix[i] != null) { if (fix[i] <= prev || fix[i] >= ub) return false; prev = fix[i]; continue; } Integer cand = inv.ceilingKey(prev == Integer.MIN_VALUE ? Integer.MIN_VALUE : prev + 1); while (cand != null && cand < ub) { int have = inv.get(cand); if (have >= sizes[i]) { // consume and go on if (have == sizes[i]) inv.remove(cand); else inv.put(cand, have - sizes[i]); prev = cand; break; } cand = inv.higherKey(cand); } if (cand == null || cand >= ub) return false; } return true; }; // Assign groups in lexicographic order (by first appearance), picking the smallest viable value each time for (int g : groupOrder) { // bounds from neighboring score groups already fixed int lb = Integer.MIN_VALUE, ub = Integer.MAX_VALUE; for (int i = g - 1; i >= 0; i--) if (assigned[i] != null) { lb = assigned[i]; break; } for (int i = g + 1; i < m; i++) if (assigned[i] != null) { ub = assigned[i]; break; } boolean placed = false; for (Integer cand = stock.ceilingKey(lb == Integer.MIN_VALUE ? Integer.MIN_VALUE : lb + 1); cand != null && cand < ub; cand = stock.higherKey(cand)) { int have = stock.get(cand); if (have < sizes[g]) continue; // try commit TreeMap<Integer,Integer> snap = new TreeMap<>(stock); if (have == sizes[g]) snap.remove(cand); else snap.put(cand, have - sizes[g]); Integer[] trial = assigned.clone(); trial[g] = cand; if (canFinish.apply(trial, snap)) { assigned[g] = cand; if (have == sizes[g]) stock.remove(cand); else stock.put(cand, have - sizes[g]); placed = true; break; } } if (!placed) return Collections.emptyList(); // impossible } // Build output in participant order Map<Integer,Integer> scoreToPrize = new HashMap<>(); for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) scoreToPrize.put(scores[i], assigned[i]); List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>(n); for (int p : points) res.add(scoreToPrize.get(p)); return res; }

Share this Q&A