I have a plant type detection and disease and pest...

Created on: August 10, 2025

Answered using GPT-5 Thinking by Chat01

Question

I have a plant type detection and disease and pests detection task using a VLM like gemma3 4b. I want to increase it's accuray in these tasks by leveraging disease segmentation polygons mask coordinates. How can I do that? Can you explain for me in details?

Thought

Explaining VLM approach

The user is asking about improving accuracy with a Vision Language Model (VLM) using disease segmentation. I can explain techniques like prompt engineering, grounding with segmentation masks, and multi-modal inputs. I’ll propose methods like masking the region for cropping lesions, adding masked images to the input, or using attention biasing to guide the model more accurately.

Refining VLM with masks

To improve VLM accuracy, I'd recommend using masked images to emphasize regions of interest by greying out the background. It’s also useful to fine-tune with LoRA, adding a mask as a binary channel to combine with RGB images. Additionally, multi-task fine-tuning could help with both classification and disease detection using polygon masks and labels.

Improving model accuracy with distillation

To enhance VLM performance, using distillation for segmentations into textual rationales can work. I'll suggest region-aware losses and contrastive learning with masked cropping. For prompt design, it might be better to render overlays instead of raw polygons. Additionally, structured outputs in JSON, and zoom-level augmentations during inference, could improve detection accuracy.

Improving model accuracy with logit averaging

To improve model performance, I’d suggest logit averaging and few-shot learning using synthetic prompts with overlays. For training, using an "Adapter to query" approach could be helpful, appending mask and bounding box coordinates to the prompt. Additionally, I could provide pseudo-code for implementing a mask overlay cropping approach using a vision-language encoder. I'll also include metrics for evaluating accuracy, classification, and uncertainty.

Thought for 27s

Answer

Great question — segmentation polygons are a gold mine for improving VLM accuracy on fine-grained agri tasks. Below are practical, progressively “deeper” ways to inject those masks into a Gemma-like 4B VLM pipeline, from no-finetune tricks to light adapters and region-supervised finetuning. Pick the depth that matches your constraints.

1) No-finetune: make the model look where it matters

These are drop-in inference tweaks that often yield big gains on disease/pest tasks.

A. Multi-view inputs (original + ROI crops + overlay)

  • For each polygon mask:
    • Compute a tight bbox, dilate by ~10–20% to include context.
    • Produce 2 derivatives:
      1. ROI crop (high-res patch of just the diseased area).
      2. Overlay view (original image with the polygon filled or outlined; background optionally dimmed to 30–50%).
  • Feed the VLM a small set of images in one prompt (if the API supports multi-image), or stitch them into a single canvas horizontally.
  • Prompt template (disease):
    text
    You’ll see the original leaf and a zoomed patch. The colored region marks the suspected lesion. Task 1: Plant species (top-1). Task 2: Disease vs. pest vs. healthy. Task 3: If disease/pest, name it and cite key visual cues in the colored region. Output JSON with keys: species, class, name, cues.
  • Why it helps: it reduces background bias (soil, pot type, lab benches) and gives the model a high-resolution look at small lesions or insects.

B. Background suppression (“soft masking”)

  • Create a masked image where pixels outside polygons are blurred/desaturated, while the lesion stays sharp.
  • Keep lesion color/texture intact; randomize overlay color (to prevent color→label leakage).

C. Test-time ensembling

  • Run the VLM on: (i) original, (ii) overlay, (iii) ROI crop (1×, 1.5×, 2× zoom).
  • Average class logits if you can access them; otherwise, take majority vote with a confidence heuristic (e.g., prefer answers that repeat across ≥2 views and contain lesion-based “cues”).

D. Structure the output

  • Force a schema so the model doesn’t hedge:
    json
    {"species":"", "class":{"type":"disease|pest|healthy"}, "name":"", "cues":["…","…"], "confidence":0-1}

2) Light integration: use the mask to steer attention (no full retrain)

If you can touch the vision encoder or do parameter-efficient finetuning:

A. Mask-guided attention bias (encoder-level)

  • If the vision tower is ViT-like, identify patch tokens overlapping the polygon(s).
  • Add a learnable bias to QK attention for ROI tokens (or rescale their key/value norms).
  • If you can’t change attention, do masked average pooling: compute an extra ROI embedding by averaging only patch tokens inside the mask, then concatenate [CLS, ROI_EMB] before the LLM.

B. Extra input channel without breaking 3-channel contracts

  • Render the binary mask as a grayscale overlay concatenated side-by-side to the RGB image (so the network still sees 3-channel tiles), or encode as a subtle alpha matte on the original. In practice this preserves plug-compatibility while making the ROI explicit.

C. Prompt-conditioned visual tokens

  • Derive a short “mask descriptor” from polygon geometry (area %, centroid, long/short axis). Inject into the prompt:
    Region of interest covers ~12% of the leaf near the right margin; elongated shape with irregular edges.
    
    This gives the LLM spatial priors without needing internal changes.

D. Few-shot exemplars with overlays

  • Show 3–5 labeled examples (original + overlay + zoom), each with “cues” grounded in the highlighted region. Keep overlays stylistically consistent with your inference overlays.

3) Finetuning: teach the VLM to use the mask

Where you’ll get the biggest, most stable gains.

A. Multi-task objective

  • For each training sample (image, polygons, labels) create three views: original, overlay, ROI crop.
  • Train with losses:
    • Disease/pest class CE (or seq-to-seq tokens if you generate text).
    • Species class CE.
    • Region-grounding loss: encourage cross-attention maps or Grad-CAM on lesion tokens to overlap the mask (KL or Dice between normalized attention and mask).
    • Optional caption loss: short rationale like “tan oval lesions with concentric rings inside ROI”.
  • Parameter-efficient: LoRA on projector/vision MLP + LLM input layers (e.g., r=8–16). QLoRA if VRAM is tight.

B. Mask-conditioned adapters

  • Feed a ROI embedding (masked average of vision tokens) to a small MLP and add it as a prefix visual token (a “region token”) before the normal sequence. Train LoRA on the cross-attention that reads this token.
  • At inference, the region token is derived from your polygons; without polygons, omit it (model falls back gracefully).

C. Multi-instance learning for multiple polygons

  • Treat each polygon as an instance. Predict per-instance class logits, then aggregate via:
    • Noisy-OR for presence detection (any lesion ⇒ positive).
    • Top-k pooling for class names (use top-1 or top-2 instances).
  • This reduces misses when you have several small pests/lesions.

D. Negative sampling & bias control

  • Add hard negatives: same species but healthy; same background but different plant.
  • Randomize overlay color/thickness, and include a “mask present but healthy” case to prevent “mask ⇒ diseased” shortcut.

4) Pests: tiny objects need resolution & priors

  • Use higher-zoom ROI crops than diseases (2–4× on the mask bbox).
  • Add a size prior token to the prompt: “ROI spans ~0.6% of image; look for small insects, aphids, mites.”
  • If you have bounding boxes for pests, pass multiple tiny crops; aggregate with majority vote.

5) Data pipeline notes (concrete)

Preprocess

  • Normalize polygons to image space.
  • Merge overlapping polygons; keep small ones if area ≥ 0.1–0.3% of image (tune).
  • Create 3–5 views per sample: original, overlay (outline and/or fill, alpha=0.3–0.5), ROI crops at 1.0×/1.5×/2.0×.

Prompt template (unified, JSON-only)

text
You are an agronomy assistant. Images: [original, overlay, 1.5x crop, 2.0x crop]. The colored region marks the area of interest (drawn from a segmentation mask). Return JSON only: { "species": "<plant species>", "class": "disease|pest|healthy", "name": "<diagnosis or pest>", "cues": ["short bullet cues grounded in the colored region"], "confidence": 0.0-1.0 }

Pseudo-code (PyTorch-style)

python
def make_views(img, polygons): mask = rasterize(polygons, img.size) # HxW bool bbox = dilate_bbox(mask_to_bbox(mask), scale=1.2) crop1 = crop(img, bbox, scale=1.0) crop2 = crop(img, bbox, scale=1.5) overlay = draw_overlay(img, polygons, fill_alpha=0.35, outline=3) soft_bg = blur_outside(img, mask, sigma=7) # optional variant return [img, overlay, crop1, crop2] def vlm_infer(model, processor, views, prompt): # stitch views horizontally if single-image API canvas = hstack(views) if not model.supports_multiimage else views inputs = processor(prompt=prompt, images=canvas, return_tensors="pt") return model.generate(**inputs) # Ensembling example answers = [vlm_infer(model, proc, make_views(img, polys_variant), prompt) for polys_variant in augment(polygons)] final = vote_or_logit_average(answers)

6) Region-aware evaluation (to see the gain)

  • Report macro-F1 per class (diseases are often imbalanced).
  • Slice metrics by lesion size and zoom to verify small-lesion gains.
  • Run counterfactuals: original vs. masked-out-lesion; accuracy should drop if the model truly relied on the lesion (sanity check against background shortcuts).

7) Hyperparameters that usually work

  • Overlay alpha: 0.35–0.5; outline width 2–4 px at 1K px image width.
  • Dilation for ROI bbox: 10–20% each side.
  • Ensembling: 3–5 views; abstain if model disagreement ≥2 classes and return “uncertain”.
  • LoRA: r=8–16, α=16–32, lr 1e-4 to 3e-4 on adapters, 1–3 epochs; freeze vision backbone if data <20k samples.

8) Common pitfalls

  • Color leakage: don’t fix overlay color per class; randomize.
  • Over-cropping: include some healthy context; otherwise many diseases are ambiguous.
  • Label noise: polygon may include veins/edges that mimic lesions; use slight erosion (1–2 px) to focus on core region for ROI pooling/attention supervision.
  • Tiny pests: ensure at least one view preserves native sensor resolution over the ROI.

If you tell me your current API constraints (multi-image or single-image only), and whether you can finetune with LoRA, I can sketch an exact prompt, view generator, and (if allowed) a small training loop tailored to your stack.

Share this Q&A