【Slide1 "Having explored how hedging language ensu...

Created on: March 11, 2025

Answered using O1 by Chat01

Question

【Slide1
"Having explored how hedging language ensures cautious academic expression, we now turn to a cornerstone of scholarly writing—verb selection. This choice directly shapes the formality and credibility of our texts."

[Pause for audience transition]

"Let's begin with an interactive challenge. On your screen are three verbs: A. examined, B. investigated, C. scrutinized. Within 3 seconds, choose which one you consider most academic."

[Wait for responses, then click to reveal]

"Those who selected option C—scrutinized—have intuitively grasped today's key concept. The Latin-root 'scrutinized' (详细审查) carries stronger academic weight than its Germanic counterparts. This interactive warm-up leads us to systematically unpack academic verb selection strategies."

[Transition cue]
"Our journey today will equip you with three core competencies: identifying formal verb features, mastering selection principles, and avoiding cross-disciplinary pitfalls—essential skills for building scholarly authority."
Slide2
Hello everyone, and welcome to our second slide, which highlights our key learning goals for this session. By the end of this module, you should be able to answer three essential questions:

First, why is verb choice so important for academic writing? In other words, how do precise (精确的) verbs increase clarity and credibility?

Second, how can we improve the precision (精确度) and professionalism (专业性) of our verb usage? We will explore practical strategies and examples to elevate your writing style while keeping it clear and concise (简明).

Finally, we will look at how to incorporate discipline-specific (学科专门的) verbs to create a stronger scholarly identity (学术身份). These specialized words help show your familiarity with a particular field, making your arguments more authoritative (权威的) and accurate (准确的).

Keep these goals in mind as we continue. Let’s see how our choice of verbs can influence everything from clarity to credibility in academic writing.

Slide3
First is Precision. Verbs like 'investigate' carry a clear sense of formal inquiry, whereas 'look into' sounds casual and vague. Precision in meaning enhances clarity, so readers know exactly what you did.

Second is Credibility. Compare 'demonstrate' (证明) with 'show.' Both communicate a result, but 'demonstrate,' which stems from Latin, implies a structured, evidence-based argument. This higher formality boosts the author’s authority.

Third is Identity. Specific verbs reflect the discipline you belong to. In biology, you might 'phosphorylate' (磷酸化) something; in economics, you could 'amortize' (分期偿还) a loan. These words signal your academic field and reinforce expertise.

Finally, a short case study highlights how different verbs can transform the same research findings. By choosing more refined terms, you exhibit the rigor expected in academic discourse. Let’s explore that contrast next."
Slide4
Welcome to our fourth slide, which introduces some essential guidelines for maintaining a formal style in academic writing.

First, we should avoid contractions (缩约形式) such as “don’t,” “can’t,” or “won’t.” Instead, use “do not,” “cannot,” or “will not.” This small change instantly makes our text appear more polished (精致) and professional (专业).

Second, keep your grammatical structures intact (完整). For instance, instead of writing “he’s been working,” try “he has been working.” Such small details help convey a higher level of formality (正式程度).

Finally, steer clear of informal or colloquial expressions (口语化词汇). Instead of “gonna,” say “going to.” Rather than “kinda,” use “somewhat.” These adjustments help ensure your academic writing remains clear and respectful (庄重), which can enhance your credibility (可信度) as a scholarly author.

Let’s keep these points in mind as we continue to refine our verb choices and overall writing style.
Slide5
On this slide, we shift our focus to semantic precision (语义精确性). Our goal is to replace vague or overly general verbs with language that accurately reflects academic depth (学术深度).

First, consider terminology level (术语化程度). For example, using “investigate” instead of “look into” signals a more rigorous (严谨的) approach. Second, keep in mind semantic accuracy (语义精确度). Words like “diminish” convey a more precise meaning than “decrease.” Third, look for disciplinary acceptance (学科接受度). Even a shorter, more casual-looking verb like “grasp” can be highly accepted in many academic fields, as it suggests thorough understanding (透彻理解).

When possible, replace casual phrases with a more exact verb— for instance, say “increase” instead of “go up.” Likewise, steer away from vague verbs such as “do,” “make,” or “get.” By focusing on precise (精确的), field-specific (学科专门的) verbs, we can communicate ideas more effectively and maintain a formal academic tone.

Let us be mindful that these small changes can significantly enhance the credibility (可信度) of our writing. With that in mind, we will keep refining our verb choices to ensure each sentence captures the nuance we want to convey.
Slide6
6-A
Now, let us look at how discipline-specific verbs can help build a credible academic identity (学术身份). When writing in STEM fields, for instance, verbs like “phosphorylate,” “extrapolate,” or “validate” highlight your understanding of specialized concepts (专业概念). These choices convey depth and expertise.

In the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS), verbs such as “contend” or “regress” similarly demonstrate that you are engaging with the established discourse (学术讨论) in those fields. By selecting terminology accepted within your discipline, you are effectively showing your readers that you know its conventions (惯例) and can speak its language.

This strategy not only strengthens your credibility (可信度) but also aligns you more closely with a specific academic community. Let us explore this idea further on the next slide.
6-B

On this slide, let us dig deeper into how these discipline-specific verbs reflect your academic identity (学术身份). In many STEM fields, the emphasis lies in process verification (过程验证). Verbs like “calibrate,” “simulate,” and “quantify” show that you are systematically measuring and evaluating phenomena.

By contrast, in Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS), there is a greater focus on argumentation, interpretation, and contextualization (情境化). This means verbs such as “argue,” “interpret,” and “contextualize” illustrate a more analytical (分析性) and discursive (论述性) approach.

Remember, while choosing these verbs, it is essential to avoid personification (拟人化). Rather than saying, “The paper argues,” we can more precisely write, “The paper presents arguments.” This subtle difference helps maintain a formal and objective (客观的) tone.

Choosing the right verbs for your field not only communicates your understanding of the subject matter but also helps readers place your work within a specific scholarly conversation (学术对话). By remaining consistent and precise, you enhance both clarity (清晰度) and credibility (可信度).
Slide7
On this slide, we illustrate the concept of a three-tier verb hierarchy (层级). At the base, we have basic verbs like “do,” “make,” and “get.” While these are common in everyday language, they lack the precision (精确度) we typically expect in scholarly writing.

Moving up a level, we encounter more general academic verbs such as “analyze,” “indicate,” and “suggest.” These choices demonstrate a more formal (正式的) and informed tone, helping to convey thoughtful (深思熟虑的) reasoning.

At the top, we reach discipline-specific (领域特定的) verbs, shown in blue (STEM) or green (HSS). Terms like “phosphorylate” (磷酸化), “extrapolate” (推断), or “contend” (主张) clearly place your work within a specific academic tradition (学术传统), showcasing your familiarity with its specialized concepts (专业概念).

By visualizing these verb tiers, we see how your word choice can both reflect your field and reinforce your authority (权威性). As you refine your writing, consider where each verb sits in this hierarchy, so your message maintains the desired level of precision and rigor (严谨性).
Slide8
Hello everyone! On this slide, we have an interactive revision exercise. Let us look at this table, which compares the original text and the improved version for each sentence. Notice how certain expressions are too casual (过于口语化) or use incorrect terminology (不恰当术语).

Before we discuss each correction, I would like to ask: which words or phrases would you replace to make the paragraph more formal (正式) and clear? Take a moment to review the table and then share your thoughts.

[Pause for responses]

Excellent observations! As you can see from the “Improved Text” column, we changed “looks at” to “investigates,” updated the incorrect “Beck Depression Inventory” to a more suitable “technology acceptance model (TAM) scale,” and maintained proper tense (时态). Additionally, we replaced “things get better” with “significant improvement.” Each modification helps our writing become more precise (精确) and academically appropriate (符合学术规范).

Thank you for your participation (参与). It is these small adjustments that elevate (提升) our writing from casual to more professional and credible (可信度更高). Let us keep refining our skills and pay close attention to context when we select our verbs and terminology.
Slide9
Welcome to our discussion on verb enhancement strategies (动词升级策略). On this slide, we explore how to upgrade generic verbs by referencing discipline-specific dictionaries (学科词典), following a three-step flowchart:
(1) Identify the generic verb,
(2) Determine the semantic field (语义场),
(3) Choose a specialized verb.

In the verb replacement table, observe how common words like “say” can become “argue,” “claim,” or “contend,” and “think” can be replaced with “posit,” “speculate,” or “maintain.” These choices impart a more formal and scholarly tone (学术语气).

Here is one quick example: The original expression is “The program talks to the server.” First, we identify the generic verb “talks” and note that we can refine it to “communicate.” Next, we see that the semantic field involves a networking protocol (网络协议). Given that context, specialized verbs like “handshake,” “transmit,” or “poll” more accurately describe the process. This method helps ensure your writing remains precise (精确) and aligned with professional conventions in your field.

By following these steps, you will elevate the clarity (清晰度) and credibility (可信度) of your academic or technical writing. Let us keep these strategies in mind whenever we encounter a generic verb that could be upgraded.】
这个讲稿的每个slide都像独立的一样,事实上这是一个连续的ppt讲稿,修改这个问题。增强每个部分的连贯性

Thought

Enhancing coherence

OK, let me see. The user is working through smooth transitions in a PPT, aiming to unify the slides. They want each to flow seamlessly, like a single, cohesive presentation.

Enhancing clarity

I'm focusing on linking slides by maintaining content, adding references, and ensuring a cohesive flow, ultimately building a single, smooth, and final presentation.

Creating linkages

I'm thinking of adding phrases to connect concepts smoothly between slides, preserving content flow, and building a cohesive narrative throughout the presentation.

Charting the course

I’m carefully mapping out the presentation, seamlessly connecting topics from Slide 3 to Slide 8 with clear transitions, ensuring each segment aligns perfectly with the preceding point.

Aligning the conclusion

Piecing together verb enhancement strategies, I ensure they align with exercises from previous slides. The style will remain consistent, with subtle transitions enhancing coherence.

Reasoned about improving slide coherence for 12 seconds

Answer

Below is a revised version of the slides, with added transitions and references to previous and upcoming content. These adjustments aim to make the presentation read like one cohesive lecture rather than nine standalone segments. Feel free to adapt the transitions further to suit your style or audience.


Slide 1

[Intro/Title Slide]
Speaker Notes (Optional):
Welcome, everyone! Having explored how hedging language ensures cautious academic expression, we now turn to a cornerstone of scholarly writing—verb selection. This choice directly shapes the formality and credibility of our texts.

Before diving into today’s main content, let’s start with a quick interactive challenge. On your screen are three verbs: A. examined, B. investigated, C. scrutinized. Within 3 seconds, choose which one you consider most academic.

[Pause for responses, then reveal]

Those who selected option C—scrutinized—have intuitively grasped our key concept. The Latin-root “scrutinized” (详细审查) carries stronger academic weight than its more common Germanic counterparts. This interactive warm-up leads us to systematically unpack academic verb selection strategies.

Transition to Slide 2:
As we move forward, keep this idea of formal versus informal verbs in mind. Next, we will outline the core learning goals that will guide us through the rest of today’s discussion.


Slide 2

Learning Goals
Hello again, and welcome to our second slide. Here, we’ll highlight the key learning goals for this session. By the end of this module, you should be able to address three essential questions:

  1. Why is verb choice so important for academic writing?

    • How do precise (精确的) verbs increase clarity and credibility?
  2. How can we improve the precision (精确度) and professionalism (专业性) of our verb usage?

    • We’ll explore practical strategies and examples to elevate your writing style while keeping it clear and concise (简明).
  3. How do we incorporate discipline-specific (学科专门的) verbs to create a stronger scholarly identity (学术身份)?

    • Specialized words show familiarity with your field, making your arguments more authoritative (权威的) and accurate (准确的).

Transition to Slide 3:
Now that we know our goals, let’s explore the foundational reasons behind effective verb choice. We will see how strong verbs impact precision, credibility, identity, and more.


Slide 3

Why Verbs Matter
Building on our learning goals, we turn to the three main reasons that verb choice plays a critical role in academic writing:

  1. Precision.

    • Verbs like investigate carry a clear sense of formal inquiry, whereas look into sounds casual and vague. Precise meaning enhances clarity so readers know exactly what you did.
  2. Credibility.

    • Compare demonstrate (证明) with show. Both communicate a result, but demonstrate, which stems from Latin, implies a structured, evidence-based argument. This higher formality boosts the author’s authority.
  3. Identity.

    • Specific verbs reflect the discipline you belong to. In biology, you might phosphorylate (磷酸化); in economics, you could amortize (分期偿还). These words signal your academic field and reinforce expertise.

Short Case Study (Optional):
A brief contrast of research findings using different verbs reveals how refined language exhibits the rigor expected in academic discourse.

Transition to Slide 4:
Next, we’ll look at some practical guidelines for preserving a formal style in your writing, which will help you apply this precision consistently.


Slide 4

Maintaining Formal Style
Now that we understand why verb choice matters, let’s reinforce our commitment to formality with three guidelines:

  1. Avoid Contractions (缩约形式).

    • Instead of “don’t,” “can’t,” or “won’t,” use “do not,” “cannot,” or “will not.” This minor shift instantly heightens formality (正式程度).
  2. Keep Grammatical Structures Intact (完整).

    • Rather than “he’s been working,” write “he has been working.” Such details strengthen professionalism (专业性).
  3. Steer Clear of Informal or Colloquial Expressions (口语化).

    • Replace “gonna” with “going to,” “kinda” with “somewhat,” and so on. These adjustments ensure your writing remains clear, respectful (庄重), and credible (可信).

Transition to Slide 5:
With these formality tips in mind, we’ll now deepen our exploration of semantic precision—how choosing the exact verb can transform your academic tone.


Slide 5

Semantic Precision (语义精确性)
Continuing from the formal style guidelines, we turn our attention to making every verb count:

  1. Terminology Level (术语化程度).

    • Using “investigate” instead of “look into” signals a more rigorous (严谨的) approach.
  2. Semantic Accuracy (语义精确度).

    • Words like “diminish” convey a more specific nuance than “decrease.”
  3. Disciplinary Acceptance (学科接受度).

    • Even shorter verbs like “grasp” can be academically accepted if they fit the context, reflecting thorough understanding (透彻理解).

When possible, replace casual phrases (“go up”) with more precise alternatives (“increase”). Avoid vague verbs such as “do,” “make,” or “get.” These small changes significantly enhance the credibility (可信度) of your writing.

Transition to Slide 6:
Next, we’ll see how tailoring your verbs to your specific discipline takes this idea of precision one step further and helps shape your academic identity.


Slide 6 (Parts A & B)

6-A

Discipline-Specific Verbs
Moving from general precision to specialized usage, let’s examine how field-focused verbs reinforce academic credibility (学术身份). In STEM fields, for instance, verbs like phosphorylate, extrapolate, or validate highlight your expertise in specialized concepts (专业概念). Such choices convey depth and rigor.

In the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS), verbs like contend or regress show active engagement with established discourse (学术讨论) in those disciplines. By using the accepted terminology, you demonstrate familiarity with the conventions (惯例) of your field.

6-B

Strengthening Academic Identity
Delving deeper, in many STEM contexts, the emphasis lies in process verification (过程验证). Terms like calibrate, simulate, and quantify confirm that you are systematically measuring phenomena. By contrast, in HSS, where argumentation, interpretation, and contextualization (情境化) are key, verbs such as argue, interpret, and contextualize reflect a more discursive (论述性) approach.

Remember to maintain an objective (客观的) tone by avoiding personification (拟人化). Instead of writing “The paper argues,” opt for “The paper presents arguments.” Small but crucial distinctions like these maintain formality and clarity (清晰度).

Transition to Slide 7:
We’ll now look at a three-tier verb hierarchy that visually clarifies how to move from basic expressions to field-specific, authoritative language.


Slide 7

Three-Tier Verb Hierarchy (层级)
Building on our discussion of discipline-specific verbs, this slide illustrates how word choice signals your level of academic rigor:

  1. Base Tier: Common verbs such as “do,” “make,” or “get.”

    • Commonly used but lack the precision (精确度) needed for scholarly writing.
  2. Middle Tier: General academic verbs like “analyze,” “indicate,” or “suggest.”

    • Demonstrate a more formal (正式的) and thoughtful (深思熟虑的) tone.
  3. Top Tier: Discipline-specific (领域特定的) verbs, shown in blue (STEM) or green (HSS).

    • Examples include “phosphorylate” (磷酸化), “extrapolate” (推断), or “contend” (主张). These clearly place your work within a specific scholarly tradition (学术传统).

By recognizing where your chosen verbs fall on this hierarchy, you ensure each sentence maintains the desired level of precision and rigor (严谨性).

Transition to Slide 8:
Next, we’ll practice applying these concepts through a short interactive exercise, revising casual or unclear wording into more formal academic language.


Slide 8

Interactive Revision Exercise
Let’s now refine real examples. The table on this slide compares original text with improved versions. Notice how certain expressions are too casual (过于口语化) or use incorrect terminology (不恰当术语).

Before we discuss each correction, take a moment to identify which words or phrases you would replace to achieve a more formal (正式) and clear style.

[Pause for responses]

Great observations! In the “Improved Text” column, we changed “looks at” to “investigates,” updated “Beck Depression Inventory” to “technology acceptance model (TAM) scale” (for contextual accuracy), and ensured we kept the proper tense (时态). We also replaced “things get better” with “significant improvement.” These small modifications elevate (提升) our writing from casual to more credible (可信度更高).

Transition to Slide 9:
Having practiced these revisions, our final step is to explore a structured approach to upgrading verbs—so let’s look at a practical three-step method to ensure precision in your writing.


Slide 9

Verb Enhancement Strategies (动词升级策略)
To wrap up, this slide presents a three-step flowchart for upgrading generic verbs to more scholarly alternatives. The steps are:

  1. Identify the Generic Verb.

    • For example, “say,” “think,” “talks,” or “does.”
  2. Determine the Semantic Field (语义场).

    • Figure out whether you need to indicate argumentation, speculation, communication protocols, or another academic function.
  3. Choose a Specialized Verb.

    • For instance, replace “say” with “argue,” “claim,” or “contend” in argumentative contexts, or “think” with “posit,” “speculate,” or “maintain” when discussing hypotheses.

Quick Example:

  • Original: “The program talks to the server.”
  • Step 1: Identify “talks” as a casual verb.
  • Step 2: Note that the semantic field involves networking protocols (网络协议).
  • Step 3: Use specialized verbs like “communicates,” “transmits,” “initiates a handshake,” or “polls.”

By following these steps, you elevate clarity (清晰度) and credibility (可信度) in academic or technical writing. Keep this method in mind whenever you spot a weak or generic verb that could be improved.

Concluding Remark (Optional):
We have now completed our journey from hedging language to high-level verb precision. By integrating these strategies into your work, you will maintain a strong scholarly tone, enhance precision, and accurately reflect your academic identity (学术身份).


Final Note

Together, these nine slides form a cohesive guide to academic verb selection. From the interactive opening to the final three-step method, each segment builds upon the last, ensuring you leave with practical strategies for precision, credibility, and disciplinary fluency in your writing.

Share this Q&A