obsidian,logseq,tiddywiki,notion 的特点分别是什么

Explaining note-taking tools

The user asked about the characteristics of Obsidian, Logseq, TiddlyWiki, and Notion — all note-taking tools with different focuses.

• Obsidian is markdown-based, uses local files, and features backlinking and graph views.
• Logseq is open-source, works with markdown or org-mode files, and has a graph view and outline structure.
• TiddlyWiki is unique, running in a browser as a self-contained, portable wiki.
• Notion offers rich content blocks, databases, and collaboration features.

I'll provide more detailed comparisons.

Reasoned for 9 seconds

Warning: Maybe intelligence degradation, would not consume credits.

Summarizing features of tools

Obsidian is a local-first, markdown-based note-taking tool that stores notes in local files. It supports bidirectional linking, a graph view, and has a plugin ecosystem for customization, but lacks native collaboration features and can require more configuration.

Logseq, like Obsidian, is local-first and markdown-based, but focuses on outline-based organization, similar to Roam Research. It has bidirectional linking, a local graph view, integrates with spaced repetition, and includes task management features.

Summarizing the features

• Obsidian: Based on local Markdown files, supports bidirectional links, graph view, and plugins. It’s highly customizable but can require configuration. It’s mainly for personal use and lacks real-time collaboration.

• Logseq: Also markdown-based, emphasizes outline and block reference. Supports task management, spaced repetition, and local storage. It's clean but the web version may not be as mature as the desktop one.

• TiddlyWiki: A self-contained personal wiki stored in a single HTML file. It's highly customizable, works offline, and is suited for non-linear note-taking, but requires technical knowledge.

• Notion: A cloud-based all-in-one workspace. It supports a wide range of functions, including project management and collaboration, but has smaller privacy and offline capabilities.

Reasoned for 19 seconds

Warning: Maybe intelligence degradation, would not consume credits.