Sroan 有一个私人的保险箱，密码是 7 个 不同的数字。 Guess #1: 9062437 G...

Evaluating possibilities

I’m testing various 7-digit combinations to find a password that matches exactly 2 correct positions in each of the 4 guesses, ensuring no adjacent matches.

Identifying valid positions

I’m mapping out 7-digit combinations by noting 2 correct, non-adjacent positions for each guess, ensuring distinct digits from 0-9.

Evaluating the constraints

I’m mapping out that each guess must have exactly 2 correct, non-adjacent digits in the correct positions, with precise alignment of both digit and position.

Identifying valid positions

I’m setting up a table to pinpoint potential 7-digit password positions from each guess, ensuring exactly 2 non-adjacent correct positions per guess with distinct digits.

Analyzing digit patterns

I’m examining the frequency and positions of digits in each guess to identify potential repeating or distinct digits, ensuring the password has 7 unique digits.

Analyzing digit distribution

I'm digging into the pattern of digits in each guess to pinpoint which digits might be repeating or unique, aiming to identify the 7 distinct digits for the password.

Identifying non-adjacent matches

I'm focusing on guess G1, pinpointing digit 7 as a potential correct choice for P7. Ensuring one more non-adjacent match is crucial, as adjacent matches are excluded.

Assessing non-adjacent selections

I'm piecing together the options for G1 and G3, ensuring digit 7 for P7 and digit 1 for P6 are non-adjacent, balancing unique and conflicting digits for the password.

Investigating unique digits

Interestingly enough, 7 seems valid for G1's P7 and 1 for G3's P6, due to their exclusive appearances. This balance of distinct non-adjacent digits is worth considering.

Evaluating positions

I'm piecing together that setting P7 to 7 aligns G1's second correct digit, ensuring no adjacent matches for G3 and confirming consistency with the "exactly 2 correct digits" rule.

Mapping out compatibility

I'm analyzing G3's non-adjacent correct position if P6=1, exploring digits from G3 that align without adjacent conflicts. Progressing through possibilities ensures a consistent solution.

Assessing digit alignment

OK, let me see. P6=1 and P7=7 don't immediately conflict with G1 or G3's requirements. Checking for any contradictions as these digits align with the constraints.

Assessing digit relevance

I’m noting that P6 can't be 3 and P7 is 7. This clears up that exactly one digit is correct from P1 to P5 for G1.

Pinpointing correct digits

OK, let’s focus on G3: none of the digits 4, 2, 8, or 6 in P1 to P5 are adjacent to P6 or P7. This makes me think there’s one non-adjacent correct digit.

Evaluating G2

Laying out G2's digits, it turns out they differ from P6=1 and P7=7, meaning no alignment with the password at those positions.

Mapping constraints

OK, I’m piecing together G2's correct digits in P1 to P5 without adjacency to P6 or each other. This ensures the constraints are clear and aligned with the puzzle's requirements.

Highlighting G2 constraints

I’m mapping out that for G2, exactly two correct digits from 1 to 7 can't be adjacent to each other. The puzzle doesn’t clarify their adjacency with other guesses' correct digits.

Ensuring non-adjacency

Mapping out G4's correct digits, they can't be adjacent. Interestingly, P1's potential correct digit must uniquely match one from P6=1 and P7=7 without adjacency issues.

Verifying G3's constraints

OK, let me see. For G3, only one digit among p1 to p4 can be correct, avoiding adjacency with p6. P5 is ruled out due to its adjacency to p6.

Identifying overlaps

I’m piecing together that G3 has one digit correct among p1 to p4. This requires checking for conflicts with G1's possibilities to ensure the password's digits are consistent.

Identifying plausible overlaps

I'm gathering info on feasible overlaps between G1 and G3's correct digit positions, ensuring no conflicts among the potential overlaps. This helps in refining the possible correct positions.

Analyzing digit intersections

I'm reviewing G1 and G3's digit sets, ensuring no clashes. Let's break down the cases to see if the selected digits fit with G2 and G4's constraints.

Confirming consistency

With p1=9 and p2=2 established, I’m checking for any conflicts with G1, G2, or G4. This ensures the digits stay unique and consistent across all guesses.

Identifying G2's constraints

It's interesting to see that G2's guess for p2=5 and p3=9 is invalid due to distinct digits. Now, I’m focusing on p4=3 or p5=6 for possible validity.

Ensuring positional uniqueness

I’m working through G2's adjacent digit constraints, confirming no two correct digits are next to each other. NowI’m leaning towards p4=3 and p5=6.

Tackling adjacency

I’m focusing on G2's constraints, avoiding adjacent correct digits. Positions p4=3 and p5=6 are unique but adjacent, so we need to find non-adjacent valid choices.

Mapping out case A2

I'm piecing together G1's and G3's clues, ensuring the digits stay distinct while considering G2's suggestions for the remaining positions. Progress is steady and thoughtful.

Mapping progress

I’m checking G2's non-adjacent constraints and distinct digit rules. So far, p2=5 and p4=3 look promising, as they align with the clues from G1, G2, and G3.

Piecing together

Finalizing the distinct digits, I’m verifying non-adjacent correct positions for G4. So far, p5 needs to be unique and chosen carefully to meet all criteria.

Charting G4 dynamics

I'm piecing together non-matching positions for p1 through p7 with G4. Having already used 9 for p1, finding a distinct and valid p5 remains tricky.

Evaluating case A3

OK, let me see. I'm noting no valid p5 choices lead to valid p2, p3, or p5 digits. Case A2 falls short, so let's turn to case A3 instead.

Ensuring alignment

Checking G1, G3, and G2 clues, I'm confirming p1=9, p4=6, p6=1, and p7=7 fit perfectly. Moving to G2, confirming two correct digits that aren't adjacent.

Assessing potential conflicts

I’m checking p2=5 and p5=6 against G2’s two correct digits. This causes issues with distinct digits, so these combinations need to be re-evaluated.

Navigating digit matches

I’m figuring out p2=5 as G2's correct digit, but p3=9 and p5=6 are ruled out due to digit distinctness. This leaves no viable second match for G2.

Spotting conflicts

OK, let's think it through: using p1=9 for G1 isn't an option, so I'll see what happens with G1 picking p2=0. This leads to a conflict with G3.

Balancing options

I'm pulling together the partial password p1=4, p2=0, p6=1, p7=7. G2 needs two non-adjacent correct digits, so I'll check combinations like p3=9 and p5=6.

Confirming digit accuracy

OK, let me see. I’m mapping p3=9 and p5=6, checking against G2 and G3 clues. The digits 4, 0, 9, 6, 1, and 7 fit perfectly with all rules.

Pinpointing the correct digits

I’m working with p1=4, p2=0, p3=9, and p5=6. G1 is satisfied with p7=7 and p2=0. Now, I need to ensure G4 gets two non-adjacent correct digits from p4 and remaining digits.

Identifying valid digits

Counting matches for G4: none so far. Digging into adjacent conflicts, no progress with p4. The challenge is meeting the requirement of exactly two non-adjacent correct digits.

Identifying the issue

OK, let me see: tracking down G4's tricky clues for two non-adjacent correct digits, but the partial password just doesn't fit the bill. Hm, that's interesting.

Taking aim at clues

Aligning p2=0 and p7=7 with G1, and p3=8 and p6=1 with G3, I’m thinking about the partial password p2=0, p3=8, p6=1, p7=7, and conflicts with p1=8.

Pinpointing matches

OK, let’s see: G2 clues suggest p4=3 and p5=6 as possible matches, but they’re adjacent. Considering other options to ensure the two correct digits are non-adjacent.

Ensuring correctness

Taking a look at Case B3: aligning p2=0, p7=7 for G1 and p4=6, p6=1 for G3. This seems to fit, but G2 needs more thought.

Mapping out options

Considering G2's clues, a couple of valid non-adjacent digit pairs are (p1=8, p3=9) and (p1=8, p5=6). Progress is being made towards finding a solution.

Aligning digits

I’m working out the details: ensuring G1 and G3 constraints are met with p1=8 and p3=9. This progress indicates a promising direction for the final solution.

Ensuring consistency

Checking for alignment, I confirm that p1=8 and p3=9 fit perfectly with G1 and G3, maintaining the integrity of the partial password, and ensuring no conflicts arise.

Addressing digit repetition

It's crucial to avoid repeating digits like 9 and 6. These conflicts highlight the need for a second match for G2, as p5 can't be 9 or 6. Progress is evident through resolving these issues.

Reevaluating approach

I’m noting that G2’s clues are too tricky with p1=8 and p5=6. Moving on to G1's constraints, ensuring p3=6 and p7=7 are correct and distinct.

Laying out the options

I’m mapping out p1=4 and p2=2 for G3, ensuring they align with G1 and G2’s constraints, and checking adjacency rules to confirm compatibility.

Verifying compatibility

Taking a closer look at partial passwords, I confirm G1 and G3 matches are good, but G2 needs more work. Adjusting p1, p4, or p5 might resolve this.

Testing combinations

I’m looking into p1=8 and p4=3 for G2's guess, ensuring they fit the partial password. Now, I’m figuring out using p5=0, 4, 5, or 9 to complete it.

Ensuring compatibility

I’m confirming no conflicts with G1, G3, or G4 using p1=8 and p4=3 for G2's guess. Now, I’m checking that G2's requirement for 2 correct digits is still satisfied.

Evaluating options

I'm considering alternatives for G2's guess to ensure G4 gets 2 matches. Setting p5=9 or p1=8, p5=6 reliably. No conflicts encountered so far.

Formulating the password

Considering p1=4, p3=6, p6=1, p7=7 for G3, I ensure compatibility with G1 and G2, but no matches yet. Adjusting p2, p4, or p5 might be necessary.

Finding the balance

I’m thinking about p2=5 and p4=3 for G2, ensuring they don't overlap and keep G2's 2 correct digits intact. This feels like a balanced approach.

Checking the fit

Mapping p5=0, 2, 8, or 9 for G4's guess, I see 0 matches. p5=9 might work, but another match is needed from p1 to p4 or p6 to p7.

Assessing new possibilities

Noticing conflicts with p4=2 in case D. Considering p2=2 for G3 might resolve issues, but it clashes with G1's guess of p2=0. Progress is steady.

Mapping out subcases

I'm thinking through subcases with p4=2 and p7=7 for G1. Avoiding digit repetition, p1=4 works well and matches G3's guess without causing conflicts with G1's guess.

Balancing matches

I'm ensuring exactly 2 matches for G2 without adjacent positions. Considering p2=5, p3=9, or p5=6, but p4=2 cannot be used due to previous constraints.

Mapping out options

I'm considering p2=5 and p5=6 for G2, ensuring no overlap with previously used digits. This gives 6 distinct digits so far, and p3 can be any remaining number.

Validating G1's guess

Confirming that G1's guess with p3=6 and p7=7 works since no extra matches happen with the known digits. Now, checking G3's guess for further validation.

Taking a closer look

I’m mapping out G4's guess. No direct matches with assigned digits. Considering the unassigned p3, but p3=5 is already used in p2. No further progress yet.

Assessing G4's guess

Checking each digit for G4's guess, but no matches occur with the assigned digits or with p3 as 5. This confirms case D2's failure.

Refining assumptions

I’m ensuring no digit repeats. Considering p1=8 conflicts with p3=8. Evaluating p2=5 and p5=6 for potential matches with G2.

Confirming digit uniqueness

Setting p2=5 and p5=6 creates a partial password with 6 unique digits. This aligns with G2's guesses for p2 and p5, ensuring no conflicts.

Piecing together

I noticed one partial match with G4 by setting p1=3. However, further combinations didn't yield a second match, maintaining the total at one.

Identifying a valid path

I found that p5=4 for G1 and p7=7 for G1 yield two matches. Subcase E1 shows progress with p1=4. This gets me thinking about the next steps.

Balancing digits

Ensuring digit uniqueness, I avoided p1=4. Now I’m focusing on p2=2 and p5=4, ensuring no adjacency and checking for matches with G1 and G2. Progress is steady.

Weighing options

I’m looking at p1=8 and p3=9 to create two matches for G2. This approach avoids conflicts with other digits and helps refine the password further.

Piecing together compatibility

I’m noting that assigning p4=0 with p1=8 and p3=9 for G2 results in only one match for G4. Further adjustments may be necessary to achieve the required two matches.

Evaluating a new approach

Attempting p1=8 and p4=3 for G2, I’m checking for conflicts with G1 and G3. This yields two non-adjacent matches and leaves p3 undetermined.

Confirming validity

I verified G1 and G3 using p1=8 and p4=3, noting two matches each. For G4, setting p3=5 provided one match. The partial password now includes p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, and p7.

Evaluating options

OK, I realized that setting p3=5 for G4 only yields one match, not two. Checking G2 with adjacent positions also didn't work out. Let's try another way.

Mapping out possibilities

I’m considering p5=4, p7=7, and p6=1 for G3, yielding two non-adjacent matches. I’m now working on p1=8 or p2=5 for G2 to avoid conflicts.

Assessing options

I’m thinking about p5=4, p7=7, and p6=1 for G3, but finding non-adjacent matches for G2 proves challenging, and potential conflicts restrict further progress.

Evaluating configurations

I'm piecing together p4=6, p5=4, p6=1, and p7=7 for G1 and G3, ensuring non-adjacent matches for G1. Now, I'm exploring p1=8 and p3=9 for G2.

Evaluating digit combinations

Testing p1=8 and p3=9 gave two non-adjacent matches for G2. Now, I’m checking these against G1, G3, and G4, ensuring distinct and consistent digits.

Evaluating options

Taking a closer look at p2 values for G4 reveals conflicts with already used digits. With no matches left, there’s no solution that fits all criteria.

Analyzing assumptions

I’m rethinking assumptions around p7=7 and p6=1, trying to align with the puzzle's criteria. This involves re-evaluating potential digits and their positions.

Revisiting digit placement

I'm rethinking the position of digit 7 in the password. Since it doesn't appear in many guesses, it might be worth excluding it to simplify the problem.

Tracking digit patterns

I’m noting that digits 0-9, except 7 and 1, appear across all guesses. This suggests the password probably includes a subset of these digits.

Mapping digit positions

I’m identifying each digit guessed in each position across four guesses. This step ensures each position holds distinct digits, aiming for exactly two matches per guess.

Mapping a strategy

I’m thinking through a systematic approach to pinpoint the password, ensuring each guess has exactly two correct digits in non-adjacent positions, with all digits unique.

Identifying feasible matches

I’m determining which digits can serve as a second match for guess #4, ensuring they are not adjacent to the digit in position 5. This leads me to consider all viable options.

Evaluating digit strategy

I'm analyzing if having 9 at p5 for guess #4 and guess #3 results in just one other correct digit, avoiding adjacency conflicts.

Evaluating options

I'm analyzing which digits can be correct in guess #3 with 9 at p5, ensuring all chosen digits are non-adjacent, to find the second correct digit.

Thinking through options

If 9 is at p5, I’m noting that positions 4 or 6 are out due to adjacency. This results in choices like 3, 5, or 7 for G4's second correct position.

Ensuring alignment

OK, let me see. I’m confirming that the partial password aligns with guesses #3 and #4. Checking guess #1, I’m looking for two non-adjacent correct digits.

Confirming guess alignment

I’m checking that the partial password satisfies guess #1 by verifying two non-adjacent digits—0 and 2—at positions 2 and 4, ensuring they differ by at least 2.

Evaluating consistency

I’m verifying that the partial password from guesses #3 and #4 aligns with guess #2. Ensuring no digit repeats and finding a second match for guess #2 at p6.

Adjusting my approach

I realize there’s no valid second match for guess #2 with the current digits. So, I’m setting p2=4 for guess #4 and restarting to find a valid second match for guess #3.

Analyzing possibilities

I’m thinking about setting p2=4 to satisfy guesses #2 and #4, leading to p5=9 and p7=5. This configuration aligns well with the constraints and available possibilities.

Mapping out possibilities

I’m figuring out that p1=9 and p4=2 can give two matches for guess #1 by avoiding adjacency. However, repeating digit 9 is off-limits, so it won’t work.

Configuring the password

I’ve set p1=9 and p4=2, ensuring two matches for guess #1. Digits 4, 6, 9, 3, and 5 are now assigned, leaving p1 and p4 still to be determined.

Investigating options

I'm piecing together that only p1=8 aligns with guess #2, but no valid second match exists due to digit restrictions. This scenario requires further exploration.

Mapping out the solution

Setting p5=9 doesn't work for guess #4, so I'm piecing together a new approach with p5=6. I'll explore which non-adjacent digit pairs align with guess #4.

Pinpointing non-adjacent pairs

I'm mapping out non-adjacent digit pairs that could align with guess #4. The goal is to find one matching pair while ensuring the remaining positions do not align, working through subsequent guesses as well.

Trying a new tactic

Hmm, I’m thinking about a more manageable guess for G4, like (1,6), and checking if this aligns non-adjacently with digits in guesses #1, #2, and #3.

Tweaking the strategy

I’m working through guesses #1, #2, and #3 with a partial password to make sure the digits don’t overlap and are correctly positioned.

Taking a closer look

Mapping out non-adjacent digit pairs for guess #4, it’s interesting to see that none align with guess #3, suggesting a need for a refined guessing strategy for better results.

Focusing on G3

Considering the guess pairs for G3, I'm listing non-adjacent digit pairs to uncover potential matches, aiming for two accurate digits that aren't adjacent.

Crafting the strategy

I’m thinking through G3, aiming for non-adjacent digit pairs. Assigning p2=2 and p6=1, I check G1, G2, and G4 to confirm the password by evaluating digit matches.

Ensuring distinct digits

I'm mapping out the fixed digits to avoid overlaps, ensuring distinct digits for the password. Two matches for G1 are achieved with non-adjacent digits, maintaining progress.

Ensuring distinct digits

Mapping out partial passwords to avoid repeated digits, aiming for two correct non-adjacent matches. Progressing through each guess methodically.

Reassessing the approach

Piecing together the clues, I'm re-evaluating the non-adjacent digits for G4. Despite considering various possibilities, achieving two matches seems unattainable with the current assignments.

Locating a known code

Interestingly enough, the solution to this puzzle often involves finding a well-established password. I'm considering a known solution, "3 8 2 9 1 4 5," for further testing.

Matching digits

OK, let me see if the password "3 8 9 6 0 1 4" aligns with the given digits, ensuring non-adjacent matches. This methodical approach might reveal the correct password.

Verifying username possibilities

I checked each username, but none matched the pattern. Recognizing the challenge of ensuring distinct digits, progress remains steady.

Assessing password possibilities

I tested the password "8 2 6 0 3 9 4" against each guess, finding only one match. Progress is slower than expected.

Evaluating options

I glanced at "9 1 6 0 4 2 5" and noticed two matches, with non-adjacent positions as required. This seems like a promising direction to explore further.

Testing password alignment

I got two matches from G1 and only one from G2 with password "9 1 6 0 4 2 5." No luck identifying two non-adjacent matches for G2 yet.

Testing different pairs

OK, let me see. I checked pairs like (1,3) with "9 1 6 0 4 2 5" but found zero matches for G2, leaving more positions to assign.

Evaluating password options

I examined pairs like (2,5) and (2,6) for G2, ensuring non-adjacency and unique digits. Progress is being made by refining the partial password criteria.

Identifying a pattern

I considered non-adjacent pairs for G3, like (4,7) with "9 1 6 0 4 2 5," leading to one match. Adjustments would address conflicts and create a suitable password.

Trying another way

I looked at "3 5 9 0 6 1 4" for G3 but saw zero matches. Adjusting the search was necessary to find a solution.

Aligning patterns

Mapping "9 2 6 0 3 1 4" to G1 revealed 2 matches, with non-adjacent matches aligning perfectly. This approach helped refine the partial password.

Piecing together clues

I checked "9 2 6 0 3 1 4" against G2 and found 1 match. More detective work needed to find a second match.

Evaluating the pattern

I tested "9 5 6 3 0 1 4" for G2, finding 2 non-adjacent matches. This aligns perfectly with the constraints, shifting closer to the solution.

Spotting a match

I worked through "9 5 6 3 0 1 4" for G3. OK, let's think this through: 1 match popped up at position 6. Then, I checked "9 2 6 3 5 1 4," which revealed 2 good matches, both non-adjacent.

Confirming G1 satisfaction

I checked the patterns for G1 and found 2 non-adjacent matches in "9 2 6 3 5 1 4." This means it works with G1.

Adjusting my approach

I verified that "9 2 6 3 5 1 4" matched with G2 but failed G4 as it had no matches. This indicated a need to reassess the pattern or details.

Testing new patterns

I tried "9 2 6 3 4 1 5" for G4. Noticing 2 matches at non-adjacent positions, this adjusted approach seems promising.

Evaluating pattern progress

I checked "9 2 6 3 4 1 5" for G1, finding 2 non-adjacent matches. G2 had just 1 match, so I considered trying "9 2 6 0 4 1 5" next.

Assessing progress

I looked at "9 2 4 3 6 1 5" for G2, finding 0 matches. Adjusting the sequence, I noticed G2's pattern remains quite challenging.

Refining the approach

I pinpointed non-adjacent digits 3 and 4 for G2, ensuring valid matching. Progressing with G1, I identified non-adjacent matches, updating the password details.

Piecing together the puzzle

By adding p2=2 and p6=1, G3's valid non-adjacent matches were established. G1's non-adjacent matches further fine-tuned the password, enhancing the solution's precision.

Confirming G2 and G3 alignment

I checked G2's and G3's sequences with the partial password. Notably, G2 had 2 non-adjacent matches at positions 4 and 7, while G3 confirmed 2 non-adjacent matches.

Trying another way

I looked at G4, but zero matches emerged. Exploring G4's digits, I suspect pinpointing the fallback password could help find the solution.

Analyzing potential solutions

I’m digging into variations for p5 in G4's sequence to ensure a second match aligns with the 1 match already available. No luck yet.

Pinpointing the pair

OK, let me see. I’m selecting (4,7) for G4—positions 4 and 7—yielding a valid match. Then, I checked G1's non-adjacent matches, confirming two valid pairs.

Piecing it together

I found G2's non-adjacent matches (5 and 6) and identified the distinct digits 9, 6, 0, 2, and 5. Moving on to G3 next.

Pinpointing extra options

I’m noting that p6=1 for G3 yields one match. Alas, finding a second non-adjacent match is tricky, so I’ll keep trying other conditions.

Testing the waters

OK, let's see: testing the sequence "0 9 4 6 3 8 2" and "0 3 6 9 2 4 7" for G1 results in zero matches. These sequences didn't work out.

Evaluating alternative sequences

Testing different sequences for G1 yielded clear non-adjacent matches. Noticing that "0 3 6 9 2 4 7" worked well, I embraced it as a promising solution.

Evaluating password sequences

I’m testing various password sequences for G2. The sequence "0 2 9 6 3 1 4" and others didn’t yield matches, suggesting a need for further refinement or new strategies.

Ensuring valid spacing

I’m testing pairs of digits for G1, ensuring they aren’t adjacent. Valid pairs are p5=4 and p7=7, which are 2 positions apart, confirming they are valid matches.

Testing the sequence

While checking G2 with partial password p1=8, p3=9, p5=4, p7=7, two non-adjacent matches at positions 1 and 3 emerged, suggesting progress.

Analyzing digit pairing

I'm examining digit pairs for G3, focusing on non-adjacent matches. Pairs like p2=2 and p6=1, spaced four times apart, are looking promising.

Verifying matches

I'm confirming that p2=2 and p6=1 align with G3 by checking non-adjacent positions, ensuring no conflicts with other digits. Progress is evident as we work through adjacent checks.

Analyzing digit pairs

For G1, selecting p3=6 and p5=4 meets the criteria, yielding two valid non-adjacent matches. I’ll test this further on G2 and G4.

Testing digit options

Checking pairs for G2, I find p2=5 and p4=3 fit non-adjacent requirements. This setup aligns well with G1 and avoids digit repetition.

Gathering info

I’m digging into G3 with p2=5, p3=6, p4=3, and p5=4. Considering non-adjacent matches with other digits shows no conflicts so far.

Considering constraints

Working through digit pairs for G4, I’m noting the complexity and aiming for a non-adjacent match. The constraints make me think there might be a more straightforward solution.

Testing connections

I’m working through possible digit pairs for G4, like p1=9 and p3=6, ensuring no adjacency and no digit repetition. This method keeps options open and avoids conflicts.

Taking a closer look

I’m comparing digit pairs for G1 and P. It’s interesting to note the complexity as I navigate a different reference, assessing non-adjacency and digit repetition.

Evaluating options

I'm pulling together part of the puzzle by using a solver. It’s intricate, but the goal is to ensure all conditions are met for a final solution.

Assessing potential answers

I’m thinking through various plausible solutions to dovetail with the puzzle's needs, but finding the unique final solution is proving to be quite challenging.

Reasoned for 11m 31s