✨ I’m considering the criteria to evaluate the influence of researchers or research institutions in psychological intervention for chronic disease patients, focusing on academic, policy, and clinical application aspects.

🔍 Searched for evaluation criteria in academics and research

✨ I’m organizing key metrics into academic, policy, and clinical influence, ensuring they span empirical research with specific intervention examples. This approach clarifies the measurement of each category effectively.

✨ Using a search engine with Chinese queries is proving difficult. I’m thinking of trying Chinese sites or reformulating search terms in English.

🔍 Searched for h-index and policy metrics

✨ Considering relevant Chinese guidelines and frameworks, such as the Payback model by Buxton and Hanney, to assess academic, policy, and clinical impacts.

🔍 Searched for academic, policy, and clinical influence metrics

✨ OK, let me see. The search results mainly focus on academic metrics. The library guides might include policy citations and altmetrics. The fifth result could potentially cover policy and clinical citations.

🌐 Read balamand.libguides.com

✨ I'm mapping out the five metrics: Citations (various types), Usage (clicks), Bibliographics, Users, and Administrative. This suggests a detailed assessment.

🔍 Searched for five categories of influence metrics

✨ I'm noting the possibility of using "policy citations" and "clinical citations metrics" for alternatives.

🔍 Searched for policy citations and research impact metrics

🌐 Read metrics-toolkit.info

✨ I’m gathering info on policy citations, revealing the extent to which research influences policy documents, and levering citations in authoritative health guidelines to gauge impact.

I’m compiling a comprehensive list of references to validate each key indicator, covering academic, policy, and clinical impacts, and using established models for research impact assessment.

🌐 Read becker.wustl.edu

✨ I'm organizing indicators under the Legislation & Policy category, focusing on Committee Participation, Guidelines, Legislation/Regulation, Policy, Standards, and Testimony. This mainly covers policy influence. Academic likely aligns with "Advancement of Knowledge", including publications and citations.

🌐 Read more from becker.wustl.edu

✨ I’m thinking about the "Advancement of Knowledge" section to note publications and citations.

Locating specific items
Indeed, this section likely details publications and citations, which are worth noting.

🌐 Read more from becker.wustl.edu

✨ I’m mapping out key academic metrics: number of publications, citations, and publication in high-impact journals. This helps evaluate research quality and influence effectively.

🔍 Searched for top journals and researcher influence

✨ I'm mapping out that publishing in top journals, like NEJM, is a clear indicator of influential work. Broadly accepted, but specifics can be looked up if needed.

✨ OK, let me see. Listing SRP scientists publishing in high-impact journals showcases their progressive research, likely evidencing a thorough scientific journey.

🔍 Searched for academic influence and research metrics

✨ I’m assuming "学术影响力" refers to key academic metrics in Chinese, possibly including citations and h-index. If the resource is accessible, metrics like publications and citations might be listed in Chinese.

🌐 Read mindthegraph.com

✨ Examining academic influence, including citation count, h-index, authoritative journal publications, and policy engagement.

I’m gathering info on citation counts, h-index, and top journal publications. Considering policy involvement and clinical impact to draw comprehensive conclusions.

🌐 Read ccf.org.cn

✨ I’m gathering info on how policy citations and academic metrics like h-index and journal impact factor can indicate a researcher's influence and policy impact.

🌐 Read mindthegraph.com

✨ Interestingly enough, research study members are invited to advisory boards or committees for policy development. It's quite fascinating to see how this ties into policy actions, like guidelines or legislation.

🌐 Read becker.wustl.edu

✨ I’m thinking about opening around L490, ready for the next steps.

🌐 Read more from becker.wustl.edu

✨ I’m identifying key aspects of clinical implementation: adoption of research into clinical apps, use of clinical decision aids, integration into guidelines, practice changes based on findings, and creation of continuing education materials.

🌐 Read more from becker.wustl.edu

✨ Interestingly enough, I’m emphasizing the use of tables for clarity and readability, avoiding image clutter, and specifically tailoring descriptions to chronic disease psychological interventions.

I'm working through the importance of headings and short paragraphs, considering Chinese language for output, and minimizing English references, while confirming clarity and specificity in describing metrics.

✨ Piecing together academic and policy references to substantiate indicators. Ensuring clarity and logical flow.

Considering [17†L92-L98] to explain that policy documents are part of altmetrics, showing their comprehensive influence in research. Progressing through this thought to enrich the rationale.

🌐 Read ccf.org.cn

✨ I’m mapping out influence criteria for chronic disease patient psychological interventions. This includes academic, policy, and clinical impacts, with particular attention to empirical intervention research.

I’m focusing on empirical intervention research, emphasizing actual trials or programs with chronic disease patients. It’s crucial to cite references precisely, ensuring logical context throughout the document.

🌐 Read becker.wustl.edu

✨ I’m gathering details to craft the final Chinese markdown. Ready to finalize this step.

Research completed in 5m