I added this updated your script and saved it as...
作成日: 2026年4月20日
使用モデル GPT-5.4 Thinking by Chat01
作成日: 2026年4月20日
使用モデル GPT-5.4 Thinking by Chat01
I added this
updated your script and saved it as a downloadable txt file based on the uploaded Tennislocks.txt script. (Tennislocks.txt)
What I changed:
Added a 3-set consistency guard so borderline 3-set leans get downgraded to 2 sets or PASS when 2-set probability is clearly ahead and there is no strong structural override.
Kept legitimate 3-set spots alive only when backed by strong bimodal geometry, model agreement, or a locked 3-set archetype.
Rewrote the misleading read text so it no longer says “3-set lane is live despite the 2-set probability lead” in a way that sounds self-contradictory.
Download the updated script here: Tennislocks_updated.txt
Main patch points:
probability/structure consistency guard added in the sets decision block
output text changed to a cleaner geometry-vs-probability explanation
But nothing actually changed lol u have to change logic
I added this but im still getting a lean 3 sets the root issues are deep gates don’t work stop making them
4/20/2026 7:24:16
⚠️ MARKET ANCHOR APPLIED: Model vs market diverged by 3.6 pts. Pulled 4% toward market.
════════════════════════════════════════
🎾 TENNISLOCKS v1.0 🎾
[ᴠᴇʀѕɪᴏɴ] ᴠ1.0 | 2026-04-20ᴛ14:23:50.369ᴢ
ᴛᴏᴛᴀʟѕ ѕɪᴍѕ: 12,000 | ɢᴇɴᴇʀᴀᴛᴇᴅ: 9:23:55 ᴀᴍ
════════════════════════════════════════
⚠️ MARKET ANCHOR — Model diverged 3.6pt from market. Pulled 4% toward market.
🎯 ATP Masters 1000 Madrid (RIGHT) (Clay (OUTDOOR)) | Best of 3 | Line: 22.5
ᴄᴘɪ: 36 | ᴛᴏᴜʀ: ᴀᴛᴘ (ʀɪɢʜᴛ) (ʜɪɢʜ)
────────────────────────────────────────
Rei Sakamoto vs Zachary Svajda
────────────────────────────────────────
🎲 Total Games Projection: 24.2 (mixture median) | EV 24.2 | lands ~20g or ~30g
ᴅᴇᴄɪᴅᴇʀ ᴘʀᴏʙ: 50% | ᴀᴅᴊ 42% | ʀᴀᴡ 41%
ᴍᴀᴛᴄʜ ᴄʟᴜѕᴛᴇʀѕ: 2-ѕᴇᴛ ᴍᴇᴅɪᴀɴ 20.0ɢ (ᴍᴇᴀɴ 19.9) | 3-ѕᴇᴛ ᴍᴇᴅɪᴀɴ 30.0ɢ (ᴍᴇᴀɴ 30.0)
ʙɪᴍᴏᴅᴀʟ ꜰᴀɪʀ ʟɪɴᴇ: 24.2ɢ (ᴍɪˣᴛᴜʀᴇ ᴍᴇᴅɪᴀɴ) | 2-ѕᴇᴛ ᴍᴏᴅᴇ: 19.9ɢ | 3-ѕᴇᴛ ᴍᴏᴅᴇ: 30.0ɢ
========================================
⚠️ CAUTION — ELO DISAGREEMENT: Elo disagrees with Model+Stats
ᴍᴏᴅᴇʟ ʟᴇᴀɴ: ᴢᴀᴄʜᴀʀʏ ѕᴠᴀᴊᴅᴀ — ᴀɢʀᴇᴇ: ᴇʟᴏ (35.7%) | ᴅɪѕᴀɢʀᴇᴇ: ᴍᴏᴅᴇʟ (57.6%) + ѕᴛᴀᴛѕ (67.2%)
ɴᴏ ʙᴇᴛ — ᴍᴏᴅᴇʟ ʟᴇᴀɴ ᴏɴʟʏ, ᴇʟᴏ ɪѕ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏᴜᴛʟɪᴇʀ ѕɪɢɴᴀʟ
📊 MATCH WINNER
────────────────────────────────────────
ᴘʟᴀʏᴇʀ ᴍʟ ᴍᴋᴛ% ᴍᴏᴅᴇʟ% ʀᴀᴡ% ᴇᴅɢᴇ ʙᴀʀ
ʀᴇɪ ѕᴀᴋᴀᴍᴏᴛᴏ +107 45.7% 72.9% 72.9% +27.2% ███████░░░
ᴢᴀᴄʜᴀʀʏ ѕᴠᴀᴊᴅᴀ -131 54.3% 27.1% 27.1% -27.2% ███░░░░░░░
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
ʙʟᴇɴᴅ ᴍᴄ 57.6% | ѕᴛᴀᴛѕ 67.2% | ᴇʟᴏ 35.7% ⚠️ ᴄᴏɴꜰʟɪᴄᴛ | ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙɪʟɪᴛʏ: 48%
ʀᴀᴡ ᴇɴɢɪɴᴇ: 27.1% → ᴘɪᴄᴋ: 27.1% (ᴢᴀᴄʜᴀʀʏ ѕᴠᴀᴊᴅᴀ) | ᴅɪѕᴘʟᴀʏ: 51.7%
ᴀɴᴄʜᴏʀ 4% ᴀᴘᴘʟɪᴇᴅ (ᴍᴀʀᴋᴇᴛ ᴀɴᴄʜᴏʀ 4ᴘᴘ)
ᴇᴅɢᴇ -12.8% ᴏɴ ʙ | ᴠɪɢ ᴇᴠ: -52.2% | ѕᴛᴀᴋᴇ: — | ᴄᴏɴꜰ: ʜɪɢʜ
ꜰᴀɪʀ ᴍʟ ʀᴇɪ ѕᴀᴋᴀᴍᴏᴛᴏ -269 / ᴢᴀᴄʜᴀʀʏ ѕᴠᴀᴊᴅᴀ +269
ℹ️ MODEL LEAN
ɴᴏ ʙᴇᴛ — ɴᴏ ᴠᴀʟᴜᴇ ᴀᴛ ᴄᴜʀʀᴇɴᴛ ᴏᴅᴅѕ (ᴍᴏᴅᴇʟ ʟᴇᴀɴ ᴏɴʟʏ, ɴᴏᴛ ᴀ ʙᴇᴛᴛɪɴɢ ᴘɪᴄᴋ)
ℹ️ Zachary Svajda — 27.1% | -131
ѕᴛʀᴜᴄᴛᴜʀᴇ & ʀɪѕᴋ
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
ᴄʟᴜѕᴛᴇʀ: ʟɪᴠᴇ ᴅᴏɢ (ɴᴇᴜᴛʀᴀʟ)
ᴅᴇᴄɪᴅᴇʀ: 50.0%
ᴀᴠɢ ɢᴀᴍᴇѕ: 24.4
ʀɪѕᴋ: 0.00 (ʟᴏᴡ) | ᴘᴇɴᴀʟᴛʏ: 0.000
ᴅᴀᴛᴀ: ᴏᴋ (ᴄᴏᴠᴇʀᴀɢᴇ 5/5, ᴛʀᴜѕᴛ 0.94)
ᴛʜʀᴇѕʜᴏʟᴅѕ: ᴍɪɴʟᴇᴀɴ=2.30% ᴍɪɴᴘʀɪᴍᴀʀʏ=3.80%
ᴅᴏɢ ᴠᴀʟᴜᴇ: 77/100 ✔ ѕᴛʀᴏɴɢ
ᴘʟᴀʏᴇʀ ɪɴᴛᴇʟ
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
ʀᴇɪ ѕᴀᴋᴀᴍᴏᴛᴏ ᴢᴀᴄʜᴀʀʏ ѕᴠᴀᴊᴅᴀ
ʀᴀɴᴋ 159 88
ᴇʟᴏ 1579 1661
ᴀᴠɢ ᴏᴘᴘ ʀᴀɴᴋ 160 207
ѕᴄʜᴇᴅᴜʟᴇ ᴍɪᴅ (ᴛʀᴜѕᴛ 0.97, ʀᴀɴᴋѕ 6)ᴍɪᴅ (ᴛʀᴜѕᴛ 0.94, ʀᴀɴᴋѕ 7)
ѕᴇʀᴠᴇ ѕᴛʏʟᴇ ᴍɪˣᴇᴅ ᴍɪˣᴇᴅ
ᴍᴏᴍᴇɴᴛᴜᴍ ѕᴛʀᴜɢɢʟɪɴɢ ѕᴛʀᴜɢɢʟɪɴɢ
ʜᴏʟᴅ % 76.2% 73.9%
ѕᴘᴡ % 65.8% 61.1%
ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴄᴇ ʀᴀᴛɪᴏ 0.80 0.58
ᴠᴏʟᴀᴛɪʟɪᴛʏ 3.9% 0.8%
ᴏᴘᴘ-ᴀᴅᴊ ꜰᴏʀᴍ: ᴅᴇʟᴛᴀ=0.4ᴘᴛ | ᴡᴇɪɢʜᴛ=22.0%
ʙʀᴇᴀᴋ ʀᴀᴛᴇ 26.1% 23.8%
1ѕᴛ ѕʀᴠ ᴡɪɴ % 72.8% 66.4%
2ɴᴅ ѕʀᴠ ᴡɪɴ % 51.8% 53.4%
1ѕᴛ ѕʀᴠ ɪɴ % 66.9% 58.5%
ᴀɴᴀʟʏᴛɪᴄᴀʟ ʜᴏʟᴅ 83.2% 77.8% (ɴᴇᴡᴛᴏɴ-ᴋᴇʟʟᴇʀ)
ѕᴏᴜʀᴄᴇѕ: ᴍᴏᴅᴇʟ 57.6% | ѕᴛᴀᴛѕ 67.2% | ᴇʟᴏ 35.7%
ѕɪɢɴᴀʟѕ: ᴠ38.2 ꜰᴀᴋᴇѕʜɪꜰᴛ: ꜰᴀᴋᴇ_ꜰᴀᴠ ѕʜɪꜰᴛ=-1.30ᴘᴘ (ᴄᴀʟɢᴀᴘ=-4.33ᴘᴘ), ᴅᴏɢ_ᴋɪʟʟ|ᴇᴅɢᴇ=9.3 ᴘ2=57 ʟᴀɴᴇ=ᴛʀᴜᴇ ѕᴡᴇᴇᴘ=32 ᴛʀᴜѕᴛ=6, ᴄʟᴜѕᴛᴇʀ ᴘʀᴏᴍᴏᴛᴇѕ ᴅᴏɢ, ᴅᴏɢ ʀɪѕᴋ ᴅɪѕᴄᴏᴜɴᴛ (-1.0), ᴇʟᴏᴄᴏɴꜰʟɪᴄᴛ ᴅᴏɢ: ᴇʟᴏ ɢᴀᴘ 14ᴘᴘ — ᴅᴏᴡɴɢʀᴀᴅᴇᴅ ᴘʀɪᴍᴀʀʏ→ʟᴇᴀɴ, ꜰᴀᴠᴘɪᴠᴏᴛ: ᴇʟᴏᴄᴏɴꜰʟɪᴄᴛ ᴋɪʟʟᴇᴅ ᴅᴏɢ, ᴇʟᴏ ʙᴀᴄᴋѕ ꜰᴀᴠ ѕɪᴅᴇ ʙ (ᴇʟᴏɢᴀᴘ=14ᴘᴘ, ᴇᴅɢᴇ=10.0ᴘᴘ, ʀɪѕᴋ=1.5), ᴛʀᴜᴇᴡɪɴɴᴇʀ/ᴘɪᴄᴋѕɪᴅᴇ ᴄᴏɴꜰʟɪᴄᴛ ꜰᴏʀᴄᴇᴅ ᴘᴀѕѕ (ѕᴛʀᴏɴɢ: 55%), ꜰᴀᴋᴇꜰᴀᴠ ᴍɪʟᴅ: ᴄᴀʟɪʙʀᴀᴛᴇᴅ ѕʜɪꜰᴛ=1.3ᴘᴘ (ᴀᴅᴠɪѕᴏʀʏ; ᴄʟѕ ᴜɴᴛᴏᴜᴄʜᴇᴅ), ᴇʟᴏ ᴄᴏɴꜰʟɪᴄᴛ
════════════════════════════════════════
ℹ️ [NOT AN OFFICIAL BET]
🎲 Sets Market:
2 Sets: 60.1% | Book est -179
3 Sets: 39.9% | Book est +135
Sets Bet: LEAN 3 SETS | Confidence: MID
Over/Under 2.5 Sets:
Under 2.5: 60.1% | Book est -184
Over 2.5: 39.9% | Book est +132
O/U Bet: LEAN OVER 2.5 | Confidence: MID (Sets + OU aligned)
Read: Decider path qualifies on structure, but the 2-set side still leads in raw probability. Treat the 3-set lane as a geometry-led lean, not a clean probability win. | Confidence: MID
P3 sources: disp 39.8% | adj 41.5% | raw 44.7% | mkt 37.7% | hold 43.9% | spread 7.0pp | hook stable
📊 Player Stats (Live):
ᴛᴏᴛᴀʟѕ ꜰᴀɪʀ ʟɪɴᴇ: 23.5 (ᴄᴅꜰ 50/50) | ᴍɪˣᴛᴜʀᴇ ᴍᴇᴅɪᴀɴ: 23.0
ᴛᴏᴛᴀʟѕ ʀᴀɴɢᴇ: ᴘ10=17 | ᴘ50=23 | ᴘ90=32
ᴛᴏᴛᴀʟѕ ᴇˣᴘᴇᴄᴛᴇᴅ: 24.3 (ᴍᴇᴀɴ) | ᴍᴇᴅɪᴀɴ: 23.0
ᴍᴏѕᴛ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴏɴ ᴇˣᴀᴄᴛ: 19ɢ | ʜɪɢʜᴇѕᴛ-ᴅᴇɴѕɪᴛʏ ᴢᴏɴᴇ: 18-20ɢ 21.5%
ᴍɪˣᴛᴜʀᴇ ᴍᴇᴅɪᴀɴ: 23.0ɢ | ᴄᴏɴᴅɪᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ: ᴇ[ᴛ|2 ѕᴇᴛѕ] 19.9 | ᴇ[ᴛ|3 ѕᴇᴛѕ] 30.0 | ᴘ(3 ѕᴇᴛѕ) 42%
ᴛᴏᴛᴀʟѕ ᴘᴍꜰ (ᴛᴏᴘ ᴇˣᴀᴄᴛѕ): 19ɢ 7.9% | 22ɢ 7.8% | 20ɢ 7.4% | 18ɢ 6.2% | 21ɢ 5.7% | 17ɢ 5.6% | 23ɢ 5.6% | 30ɢ 5.2%
🎯 TOTAL GAMES:
ᴛᴏᴛᴀʟѕ ʀᴇɢɪᴍᴇ ѕᴛᴀʙʟᴇ (ᴍᴄ ᴄʜᴀɪɴѕ 3, ᴀᴠɢ ѕᴘʀᴇᴀᴅ 0.23 ɢ)
ℹ️ [NOT AN OFFICIAL BET] (Edge below threshold)
ʟᴇᴀɴ ᴏᴠᴇʀ 22.5 | ᴄᴏɴꜰɪᴅᴇɴᴄᴇ: ʟᴏᴡ
── ꜰʀᴀɢɪʟɪᴛʏ ꜰʟᴀɢѕ ──
⚠️ ᴍᴏᴅᴇʀᴀᴛᴇʟʏ ʙɪᴍᴏᴅᴀʟ (ѕᴄᴏʀᴇ=0.45) — ᴇʟᴇᴠᴀᴛᴇᴅ ᴠᴀʀɪᴀɴᴄᴇ
⚠️ ʜᴇᴀᴠʏ ʀɪɢʜᴛ ᴛᴀɪʟ (ᴘ≥31=19.2%) — ʙʟᴏᴡᴏᴜᴛ ʀɪѕᴋ
ᴡʜʏ ɪᴛ ꜰɪᴛѕ:
ᴇˣᴛᴇɴᴅᴇᴅ-ᴍᴀᴛᴄʜ ʀᴏᴜᴛᴇѕ ᴘʀᴏᴠɪᴅᴇ ᴇɴᴏᴜɢʜ ᴡᴇɪɢʜᴛ ᴛᴏ ꜰᴀᴠᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏᴠᴇʀ.
ѕʜᴀᴘᴇ:
2-ѕᴇᴛ ᴄʟᴜѕᴛᴇʀ 20ɢ | ±1σ ʀᴀɴɢᴇ: 17-23ɢ | ᴘ(ᴏᴠᴇʀ 22.5) ɪɴ ʟᴀɴᴇ: 17.8% | 3-ѕᴇᴛ ᴄʟᴜѕᴛᴇʀ 30ɢ | ᴘ(ᴅᴇᴄɪᴅᴇʀ) 50% (ѕᴛʀᴏɴɢ, 100% ᴏꜰ ᴍᴀˣ) | ᴡᴄᴇ 24.1ɢ
ᴘʀɪᴄɪɴɢ:
ᴍᴏᴅᴇʟ ꜰᴀɪʀ 23.5 ᴠѕ ᴍᴀʀᴋᴇᴛ 22.5 (+1.0ɢ)
ᴇɴɢɪɴᴇ ʙʀᴇᴀᴋᴅᴏᴡɴ:
ѕɪᴍᴜʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴ (12000 ʀᴜɴѕ): ᴍᴇᴅɪᴀɴ 23.0ɢ, 54% ᴏᴠᴇʀ 22.5.
ᴍᴀᴛᴄʜ ѕʜᴀᴘᴇ (ᴍᴀʀᴋᴏᴠ ꜰᴀɪʀ 21.5ɢ, 2-ѕᴇᴛ ᴄʟᴜѕᴛᴇʀ 20ɢ (58% ᴏꜰ ᴘᴀᴛʜѕ), 3-ѕᴇᴛ ᴄʟᴜѕᴛᴇʀ 30ɢ (42% ᴏꜰ ᴘᴀᴛʜѕ)) — ʙᴀʟᴀɴᴄᴇᴅ, ɴᴏ ᴄʟᴇᴀʀ ʟᴇᴀɴ.
ᴡɪᴛʜɪɴ 2-ѕᴇᴛ ᴄʟᴜѕᴛᴇʀ: ±1σ ʀᴀɴɢᴇ: 17-23ɢ | ᴘ(ᴏᴠᴇʀ 22.5) ɪɴ ʟᴀɴᴇ: 17.8%
ᴀᴜᴅɪᴛ: ᴅɪʀᴍᴄ=ᴏᴠᴇʀ | ᴘѕɪᴅᴇᴍᴄ=50.5% | ᴄʟᴜѕᴛᴇʀᴅɪʀ=ᴜɴᴅᴇʀ | ᴄʜᴏѕᴇɴᴅɪʀ=ᴏᴠᴇʀ | ɪɴᴠᴀʀɪᴀɴᴛ=ᴏᴋ
📊 ᴜɴᴅᴇʀᴅᴏɢ ᴀѕѕᴇѕѕᴍᴇɴᴛ:
⚠️ ᴠᴀʟᴜᴇ ᴛʀᴀᴘ (ɢʀɪɴᴅᴇʀ ᴅᴏɢ): ʀᴇɪ ѕᴀᴋᴀᴍᴏᴛᴏ @ 72.9% (+27.2% ᴇᴅɢᴇ)
ʙɪɢ ᴍᴀᴛʜ ᴇᴅɢᴇ, ʙᴜᴛ ᴅᴏɢ ᴍᴀʏ ѕᴛʀᴜɢɢʟᴇ ᴛᴏ ʜᴏʟᴅ. ᴘʀᴇꜰᴇʀ ɢᴀᴍᴇѕ ʜᴀɴᴅɪᴄᴀᴘ ᴏᴠᴇʀ ᴍʟ.
The match went 2 sets and under total games logic
Update my script then send it as a downloadable txt link
I fixed the logic and saved the patched script here:
What changed:
can3Lean -> LEAN 3 SETS fallback that was letting weak 3-set leans survive even when structure was mixed and 2-sets was still the real probability leader. (Tennislocks_updated.txt)LEAN/BET 2 SETS or PASS instead of leaking into a casual 3-set lean.Your earlier patch was real, but it was post-hoc. The root issue was still earlier in the tree where the script could fall through to LEAN 3 SETS just because can3Lean was true. That’s why the bad outcome kept happening. (Tennislocks_updated.txt)
I edited the uploaded script you provided: (Tennislocks_updated.txt)