Weighing the evidence
I'm thinking about the experiment in which living S type bacteria's DNA transformed living R type bacteria to S type. Now, I'm evaluating the accuracy of the provided statements.
Evaluating the outcome
I'm concluding that statement A is likely correct because the transformation process is not 100%, and some R type bacteria may still be present after the experiment.
Assessing accuracy
I’m considering the correctness of statements B, C, and D. Statement B aligns with Avery's conclusion, statement C aligns with bacterial colony characteristics, and statement D emphasizes DNA destruction's effect on transformation.
Assessing non-transformation
Noting that not all R type bacteria are transformed into S type bacteria. This reveals an incomplete transformation, leaving the remaining R type bacteria in the culture.
Evaluating statement A
It's becoming evident that statement A might be correct, as there's no reason for R type bacteria to disappear naturally. Both R type and S type bacteria are likely to coexist in the culture.
Evaluating transformation
Transformation isn't 100% effective, so R type bacteria likely remain post-culture. Statement A's assertion pairs well with this, and statement D's control method strengthens the argument.
Assessing the scenario
Given that transformation rarely reaches 100%, it seems reasonable to assume that some R type bacteria likely remain in the culture, potentially in reduced numbers.
Weighing the evidence
Typically, the correct "wrong" answer is A or D. However, D is likely correct.
Weighing evidence
I'm considering if statement A might omit mentioning the co-existence of R and S type bacteria, which could lead to uncertainty. This seems like an area for further investigation.
Evaluating transformations
Interestingly enough, transformations are rare, suggesting the presence of some R type bacteria post-culture. This points to statement A likely being correct.
Pinpointing transformations
OK, let me see. Given the rare transformation frequency, some R type bacteria likely survive post-culture. This suggests statement A is probably true.
Clarifying statement A
Evaluating grammar and meaning, it seems statement A could imply that all R type bacteria were transformed, which isn't feasible given the transformation rate isn't 100%.
Focusing on transformation
OK, let me see. Given the transformation rate isn't 100%, there's likely some R type bacteria left. This implies statement A could be the incorrect one.
Reassessing group dynamics
OK, instead of the S type DNA group, let's think about the "S type capsule" or "S type protein" group, which likely still contains R type bacteria.
Assessing bacterial dynamics
S type colonies appear within R type colonies due to incomplete transformation. This makes me think statement A is likely correct.
Pinpointing the error
It's interesting to see that the standard textbook viewpoint might overlook the fact that the group with S type DNA likely lacks R type bacteria, possibly labeling statement A as incorrect.
Thought about S型菌转化实验,持续 1m 28s