直线斜率乘积变化

作成日: 2025年1月20日

使用モデル O1 by Chat01

質問

曲线 EE 的标准方程是:

\boxed{\dfrac{x^2}{9} + \dfrac{y^2}{8} = 1} $$已知点 $C(-3, 0)$ , $D(2, 0)$ ,过点 $D$ 的动直线与曲线 $E$ 相交于 $M$ 、 $N$ ,设 $\triangle CMN$ 的外心为 $Q$ , $O$ 为坐标原点,问:直线 $OQ$ 与直线 $MN$ 的斜率之积是否为定值,如果为定值,求出该定值;如果不是定值,则说明理由。

思考

Assessing the ellipse

I’m analyzing an ellipse with center at (0,0) and endpoints C(-3,0) and D(2,0). A line through D intersects the ellipse at M and N, forming triangle CMN with circumcenter Q. I’m determining if the product of the slopes of OQ and MN remains constant.

Analyzing triangle slopes

I’m looking at the slopes of lines OQ and MN, considering if their product is constant. This involves exploring perpendicular slopes or other geometric properties, potentially through coordinate geometry or reflections.

Intersecting lines

I’m working through the intersection of the line through D with the ellipse to locate M and N. Then, I’ll determine Q’s coordinates and verify if the product of the slopes of OQ and MN remains constant.

Reflective properties

I’m exploring geometric reflections and chord properties in the ellipse. The focus of MN passing through D doesn’t align with the ellipse, so I’m examining intersection methods and slopes.

Guiding the process

I'm examining the circumcenter of triangle CMN, formed by a chord of the ellipse and a fixed point, to determine if the product of the slopes of OQ and MN is constant.

Tracing intersections and slopes

Mapping out intersections of MN with the ellipse and applying the circumcenter formula. Seeking to determine if the product of the slopes of OQ and MN remains constant.

Identifying geometric properties

I'm exploring the dynamics of MN as a chord of the ellipse intersecting through D, focusing on properties like the polar line or circumcircle of triangle CMN.

Tracing ellipses and reflections

Mapping out the midpoint of chord MN and reflecting the ellipse center suggests Q as the midpoint of the chord's perpendicular bisector, leading to Q being the midpoint of MN.

Tracing intersections

I’m working through intersecting lines and symmetry. Using parametric equations, I find that M and N are symmetric with respect to the midpoint of segment MN, which both lie on the line through D.

Tracing intersections

I’m analyzing the line through D and M, using parametric equations to find the intersection with the ellipse and locate N. Then, I’ll determine the slopes of OQ and MN.

Tracing intersections

I’m determining the intersection of the line through D and M with the ellipse. This helps locate N, so I can find the circumcenter Q of triangle CMN and check if the product of the slopes of OQ and MN is constant.

Reflecting on methods

Considering iterative intersections of the ellipse with lines through D and M to find N. Simplifying these intersections could reveal if the product of the slopes of OQ and MN remains constant.

Understanding circumcenter properties

I’m figuring out that Q, the circumcenter of triangle CMN, is equal distance from C, M, and N. Considering if the product of the slopes of OQ and MN remains constant, showing it might not be fixed.

Analysing parallel chords

Thinking about the director circle and midpoints of parallel chords. Reflecting C across MN's midpoint might reveal properties of the second intersection with the ellipse.

Analyzing perpendiculars

Mapping out the perpendicular bisectors of MN and CM, and considering the intersection with coordinate line properties to determine if Q is equidistant from all three vertices.

Analyzing intersections

I'm examining the x-axis intersecting the ellipse at points M and N. This shift in perspective maintains C's position and aligns D with the x-axis intersection at (2,0).

Analyzing a near x-axis chord

By examining a chord with a slight slope near (2,0), I aim to determine if this configuration provides any clarity on the product of the slopes of OQ and MN.

Piecing together slopes

I’m mapping out the intersection of the line y=x-2 with the ellipse to identify points M and N, then I’ll calculate and compare slopes to see if the product of slopes OQ and MN remains constant.

Solving intersections

I’m determining the x-coordinates where the line y=x-2 intersects the ellipse by applying the quadratic formula to solve the resulting equation for x.

Calculating intersection points

I’m working through the intersections of the line with the ellipse, identifying x and y coordinates for points M and N. This ensures the product of slopes of OQ and MN remains unchanged as the line shifts.

Determining the circumcenter

Calculating the coordinates of points M and N, I’m finding the slope of OQ to confirm if the product of the slopes of OQ and MN remains constant by determining Q's coordinates.

Mapping the coordinates

I’m calculating the coordinates of the circumcenter Q using determinants with points C, M, and N to determine if the product of the slopes of OQ and MN remains constant.

Validating slope consistency

I’m evaluating the slopes of OQ and MN for different slopes of MN to determine if the product of the slopes remains constant, considering the denominator as the midpoint formula.

Calculating determinants

I’m piecing together the determinants for the circumcenter Q using the coordinates of points C, M, and N. This helps in determining if the product of slopes OQ and MN remains constant.

Piecing together

I’m simplifying the determinant for the circumcenter Q, ensuring consistent simplification of expressions. This helps in determining if the slopes of OQ and MN consistently produce a constant product.

Working through consistency

I’m calculating the determinant of the circumcenter Q with expressions (18, 12√26) and (-16, -12√26), ensuring all expressions are consistently simplified to determine if the product of slopes OQ and MN is constant.

Ensuring precision

I’m simplifying the determinant of the circumcenter Q by verifying each expression's signs and combining terms to maintain consistency, confirming the product of slopes OQ and MN is constant.

Mapping coordinates

I’m setting up the numerator for xq using determinants and maintaining the denominator for Xq and Yq, ensuring all expressions are precisely simplified. The constant product of slopes OQ and MN is retained.

Piecing together

I’m evaluating NXN_X using determinants with x12+y12x_1^2 + y_1^2 and x22+y22x_2^2 + y_2^2 minors, which simplifies the expression for the circumcenter coordinates.

Reassessing calculations

I’m re-evaluating the simplification of NXN_X with x12+y12x_1^2 + y_1^2 and x22+y22x_2^2 + y_2^2 minors, ensuring accurate determinants for circumcenter coordinates, while considering potential simplification for points on the ellipse.

Confirming calculations

I’m piecing together x12+y12x_1^2 + y_1^2 and x22+y22x_2^2 + y_2^2 minors to verify NXN_X. It’s interesting to see that accuracy is key when ensuring the product of slopes OQ and MN remains constant.

Revisiting linearity

OK, let's confirm that grouping terms for NXN_X is consistent. Ensuring x12+y12x_1^2 + y_1^2 and x22+y22x_2^2 + y_2^2 minors are tenderly simplified helps keep the product of slopes OQ and MN constant.

Breaking down the equation

Factoring details in NXN_X with minor terms simplifies to y1y28(y2y1)\frac{y_1 y_2}{8} (y_2 - y_1), showing that the product of slopes OQ and MN is constant.

Recomputing and evaluating

I’m recalculating y1y2y_1 y_2 and y2y1y_2 - y_1 to simplify NXN_X, ensuring the product of slopes remains constant and thoroughly simplifying the expressions for accuracy.

Mapping out the product

OK, let me see. I’m calculating y1y2×(y2y1)y_1 y_2 \times (y_2 - y_1) by correcting signs and dividing by the denominator, simplifying to ensure the slopes OQ and MN product stays constant.

Breaking down the problem

I’m simplifying the expression for XqX_q by canceling terms and carefully calculating the numerator and denominator, ensuring the product of slopes OQ and MN remains constant.

Breaking down the numbers

I’m simplifying XqX_q by reducing the fraction step-by-step, ensuring the product of slopes OQ and MN remains constant while determining the greatest common divisor.

Redefining Xq

Piecing together the simplification of XqX_q with a divisor of 3, I eventually approximate the value for the slope of OQ, ensuring the product of slopes OQ and MN remains constant.

Focusing on determinants

I’m examining the minors of NYN_Y to determine YqY_q for the circumcenter, ensuring slopes OQ and MN product remains constant. Calculations include determinants with coordinates of points C, M, and N.

Recomputing NYN_Y

I’m revisiting the minors of NYN_Y to accurately determine YqY_q for the circumcenter, ensuring the product of slopes OQ and MN consistently stays constant.

Simplifying terms

I’m grouping like terms in NYN_Y to identify factors, ensuring the product of slopes OQ and MN stays constant. This helps streamline calculations moving forward.

Calculating decimal approximations

I’m working through numerical approximations for x1x_1 and y1y_1 to simplify NYN_Y, ensuring the product of slopes OQ and MN remains constant by focusing on careful decimal approximations.

Breaking down calculations

I’m approximating y12y_1^2 and y22y_2^2 for NYN_Y, calculating individual products, and summing them to ensure the product of slopes OQ and MN remains constant.

Breaking down the calculation

I’m refining the approximation for XqX_q by estimating NxNx and 2Δ2 \Delta to ensure the product of slopes OQ and MN remains constant as I evaluate these values carefully.

Mapped out

I’ve approximated XqX_q and YqY_q for slopes of 1 and 2, ensuring the product of slopes OQ and MN stays constant with Q=(0.151,0.2685)Q = (-0.151, 0.2685).

Solving intersections

I’m working through the intersection of the line y=2x4y = 2x - 4 with the ellipse, finding x1x_1 and x2x_2, then calculating y1y_1 and y2y_2 to determine points M and N.

Mapping circumcenter

I’m mapping out the circumcenter Q by calculating the midpoint of MN and using the perpendicular bisector of MN to pinpoint Q. Then, I’ll determine the slope of OQ.

Pinpointing perpendicular bisectors

I'm calculating the midpoints of MN and MC with specific slope relationships, then deriving perpendicular bisectors to identify where they intersect, a systematic approach to locate Q.

Piecing together

I’m identifying midpoints and calculating slopes for perpendicular bisectors of MN and MC to pinpoint their intersection, marking the circumcenter Q of the triangle.

Locating intersection

I’m solving for the intersection of two perpendicular bisectors to find the circumcenter Q, considering slopes for MN's intersection. The product of slopes varies with different conditions.

Thought about ellipse and geometry,持续 4m 52s

回答

分析思路概述:

题目要求考察的是:当过定点 D(2,0)D(2,0) 的动直线与椭圆

E:  x29+y28=1E:\;\frac{x^2}{9}+\frac{y^2}{8}=1

相交于 M,NM,N 时,三角形 CMNCMN(其中 C(3,0)C(-3,0) 也在椭圆上)的外心为 QQ。问直线 OQOQ 与弦 MNMN 的斜率乘积是否为常数。

若要证明“是否为常数”,常见有两种途径:

  1. 几何/对称性质法: 如果题目所给点是焦点、或某些特殊点(极与极线、焦半径性质等),有时会出现“斜率乘积恒为常数”或“相互垂直”等结论。但这里给出的点 D(2,0)D(2,0) 既不是椭圆中心也不是焦点(本椭圆焦点在 ±(1,0)\pm(1,0)),因此很可能不会产生简单的“恒定斜率积”这类经典结论。

  2. 直接坐标计算/数值检验:

    • 用“参数 + 直线交椭圆”方法求出 M,NM,N 的坐标;
    • 再由三点 C,M,NC,M,N 的外心公式(或两条垂直平分线求交)得到外心 QQ
    • 继而计算 slope(MN)slope(OQ)\text{slope}(MN)\cdot \text{slope}(OQ)
      若此乘积随所选弦不同而变化,即可断定“不恒定”。

由于本题并非经典“焦点”情形,且直接做了若干“具体斜率”的数值检验,结果显示乘积随斜率不同而改变,因此可以断定它不是定值


下面给出一个直接数值检验示例(也是最可靠的“反例”思路);只要在椭圆上取两条不同的过 D(2,0)D(2,0) 的弦,算出对应的外心 QQ,即可比较其斜率乘积是否相同。


数值检验示例

例1:令过 D(2,0)D(2,0) 的弦斜率为 k=1k=1

  • 直线方程:y=(x2)y = (x-2).

  • 与椭圆

    x29+y28=1 \frac{x^2}{9}+\frac{y^2}{8}=1

    联立:

    x29  +  (x2)28  =  1. \frac{x^2}{9} \;+\;\frac{(x-2)^2}{8}\;=\;1.

    解得两交点即为 MMNN。计算可得(略去中间展开):

    x=18±122617,y=x2  =  16±122617. x = \frac{18 \pm 12\sqrt{26}}{17}, \quad y = x - 2 \;=\;\frac{-16 \pm 12\sqrt{26}}{17}.

    由“++”号与“-”号分别得到

    M=(x1,y1),N=(x2,y2). M=\bigl(x_1,y_1\bigr),\quad N=\bigl(x_2,y_2\bigr).
  • 此时再加上 C(3,0)C(-3,0),用外心坐标公式(或垂直平分线交点)可求得外心 QQ
    数值近似(略去繁琐的代数简化,直接用小数逼近)可得到

    M(4.658,  2.658),N(2.541,  4.540),C=(3,0). M\approx(4.658,\;2.658),\quad N\approx(-2.541,\;-4.540),\quad C=(-3,0).

    计算出外心 Q(0.151,  0.2685).Q\approx(-0.151,\;0.2685).

  • 由此:

    • MNMN 的斜率就是 k=1k=1
    • 直线 OQOQ 的斜率为 0.26850.1511.78.\displaystyle \frac{0.2685}{\,-0.151\,}\approx -1.78.
    • 二者乘积 1.78.\approx -1.78.

例2:令过 D(2,0)D(2,0) 的弦斜率为 k=2k=2

  • 直线方程:y=2(x2)=2x4.y=2(x-2)=2x-4.

  • 与椭圆

    x29+(2x4)28=1 \frac{x^2}{9}+\frac{(2x-4)^2}{8}=1

    联立,解得

    x  =  18±31411,y=2x4. x \;=\;\frac{18 \pm 3\sqrt{14}}{11},\quad y=2x-4.

    相应两点为 M,NM,N

  • 同样再与 C(3,0)C(-3,0) 求外心 QQ,做数值近似:

    M(2.657,  1.314),N(0.617,  2.767),C=(3,0). M\approx (2.657,\;1.314), \quad N\approx (0.617,\;-2.767), \quad C=(-3,0).

    计算可得外心   Q(0.0455,  0.115)\;Q\approx(-0.0455,\;0.115).

  • 由此:

    • MNMN 的斜率为 k=2k=2
    • 直线 OQOQ 的斜率 0.115/(0.0455)2.53.\approx 0.115/(-0.0455)\approx -2.53.
    • 二者乘积 5.06.\approx -5.06.

可以看出,这一次的斜率乘积跟前一个例子(1.78\approx-1.78)明显不同。

因此可断定:

当过点 D(2,0)D(2,0) 的弦在椭圆上滑动时,所生成的三角形 CMNCMN 的外心 QQ 不会使得 slope(OQ)×slope(MN)\text{slope}(OQ)\times \text{slope}(MN) 固定不变,它随所选弦而改变。


最终结论

  • 该乘积不是常数
  • 一旦选取不同斜率的过 D(2,0)D(2,0) 的弦,就会得到不同的外心 QQ,从而 slope(OQ)×slope(MN)\text{slope}(OQ)\times \text{slope}(MN) 会发生变化,并不保持恒定值。

这也与我们对“椭圆+非焦点(或中心)特殊性质通常不产生固定斜率积”这一经验判断相符。

**答:不为定值。**理由如上数值(或坐标)检验所示,随着所过弦的不同,乘积确会变化。

このQ&Aを共有