Updating user's script with kernel/32k calibration adjustments

The user wants updates to their script, including applying kernel/32k calibration to thresholds and ensuring everything aligns with their new logic. They also need to ensure the script doesn't use any old helpers. I'll focus on adapting the UNDER penalty to kernel/32k-style and adjusting rescue thresholds based on the provided calibration info. I’ll find the relevant clustering logic in the file to implement these changes.

Locating relevant functions in user's file

I’ll search the user’s uploaded file for relevant functions like “totals cluster governor,” “UNDER rescue,” and others that might help with the requested updates. Using these specific terms should allow me to narrow down the exact functions that need adjustments. I'll check within the uploaded file to ensure I find the right sections.

{"queries":["Update my script to make the UNDER penalty and UNDER rescue thresholds based on the kernel/32k calibration and remove any usage of old helpers.","totalsTourPolicy underP3Penalty escapeP3Under","Totals cluster governor UNDER rescue thresholds","bandSided overSupport underSupport","underSupport penaltyK p3EdgeUnder"],"source_filter":["files_uploaded_in_conversation"]}

Updating to kernel/32k-based logic

I found that the underSupport snippet still uses a flat penalty multiplier (5.0) and needs to be updated to a kernel/32k tour-aware penalty. I'll implement a function to calculate the penaltyK based on the tour, avgHold, and line. The thresholds for rescue will also be updated to reflect kernel/32k calibration, not fixed values.

Clarifying kernel/32k calibration for rescue thresholds

It seems the user wants both the penalty values and the rescue thresholds to be tour-aware and derived from the kernel/32k calibration. The penalty mapping for tours is already provided, but I missed adjusting the rescue thresholds based on kernel/32k. I might adjust rescue thresholds by integrating the tour-specific penalty constant (totalsTourPolicy).

Inspecting totalsTourPolicy function and related thresholds

The user wants the thresholds to be based on kernel/32k calibration. It sounds like they expect the penalty constants and gates to be part of the tour policy object and derived from calibrated offsets. I’ll take a look at the totalsTourPolicy function and its current contents to understand where these adjustments are needed.

{"queries":["function totalsTourPolicy","underP3Penalty","escapeP3Under","evDecUnderThr","p2ClearStrong","p2ClearSoft"],"source_filter":["files_uploaded_in_conversation"]}

Re-searching for totalsTourPolicy function context

I haven't found the definition of totalsTourPolicy yet, so I’ll try searching for "confHigh:" to see if it's related. This might lead me to the correct place in the code where the thresholds and tour policy logic are defined. I’ll keep looking until I can locate it.

{"queries":["totalsTourPolicy(tourKey) confHigh confMid p2Gate p3Gate","confHigh:","p2Gate","p3High","function totalsTourPolicy"],"source_filter":["files_uploaded_in_conversation"]}

Adding values to totalsTourPolicy and updating calculations

I’ve found totalsTourPolicy, but it doesn’t yet include the under-specific values like underP3Penalty and escapeP3Under, which the user mentioned. It looks like the current setup uses fallback values. I’ll need to extend the policy object to include these values, then adjust the cluster governor calculations accordingly. I'll also update the penalty formula to use kernel/32k-style, derived from tour and possible factors like avgHold.

Scaling penalty using kernelScale and avgHold

I think they might want to scale the penalty based on kernelScale, probably something like penaltyK = base + (some function of avgHold). The numbers they provided seem close to a base penalty around 4.0. I'll implement those numbers but make the penalty adjustable based on avgHold, recalculating if necessary. I'll search for ctx.avgHold to see if it exists.

{"queries":["ctx.avgHold","avgHold totals ctx","centralMass avgHold","p3Under avgHold"],"source_filter":["files_uploaded_in_conversation"]}

Implementing underP3PenaltyK function using avgHold

There's no avgHold in context, but we do have holdA and holdB in _totCtxBet, so I can compute avgHold from those values. I'll create the underP3PenaltyK function that takes into account base penalties and adjusts them with kernelScale or avgHold. Higher avgHold should increase the penalty, reflecting decider match dynamics.

Defining penalty adjustment logic based on tour data

I can map the penalty adjustment using this formula: penaltyK = basePenalty * (0.85 + 0.60 * clamp01((avgHold - holdLo)/(holdHi - holdLo))). I'll use the holdLo and holdHi values from the tour config, as they represent typical values. I'll also make sure to avoid relying on old helper functions as requested.

Addressing old helpers and possible duplicates

I need to ensure I'm only using current helpers and avoid conflicts with old ones. The function totalsTourPolicy appears to be defined twice, so I’ll check for duplicates and remove the older version. I'll focus on incorporating kernel/32k calibration to set _evDecUnderThr and similar variables instead.

{"queries":["_evDecUnderThr","escapeP3Under","underP3Penalty","p2Clear","decider cap for SOFT","bandUnder promote"],"source_filter":["files_uploaded_in_conversation"]}

Exploring under rescue logic and _evDecUnderThr

I couldn't find _evDecUnderThr defined. It’s probably earlier in getTotalsPick. I’ll check around the section where under rescue is applied to update the logic, and I might need to open the full function. Using the file search tool, I can pinpoint the exact area and expand it for better clarity.

{"pointers":["1:1","1:0","3:0"]}

Updating script and implementing user changes

The user wants a script update with their patch instructions and a downloadable file link. We need to modify it by finding the totals cluster governor code and adjusting the logic as described: Over judged by weighted EV, Under using specific penalties. I'll also include tour-specific logic for the thresholds. Let’s ensure we stay away from old helpers and adjust the policy object as requested.

Updating script and patching according to user instructions

Since the user provided patch notes, I'll read the file directly, looking for the relevant functions like "getTotalsPick," "bandSided," and others. After that, I'll apply the necessary updates and avoid using old helpers. Once done, I’ll provide a downloadable link for the updated script without any instructions.

Considering tour-aware penalty calculation based on kernel/32k calibration

I need to interpret how to implement the penaltyK using kernel/32k calibration. It sounds like instead of using fixed multipliers (WTA 3.8, ATP 4.0, etc.), the penaltyK should derive from kernel scale, potentially considering factors like tour noise and decider risk. I'll need to figure out how to link this to the kernel scale or dataset.

Interpreting kernel/32k-based penalty changes

The user updated penalty values to be more tour-aware, changing UNDER from a flat 5.0 penalty to kernel/32k-based values. They want the constants (WTA 3.8, ATP 4.0, etc.) to be derived from the kernel calibration. It seems I should use the kernel-scale object, possibly through a policy object, to implement this.

Clarifying tour policy and kernel adjustments

The user wants the penalties to be based on the kernel/32k calibration, likely inside the tour policy object, not computed directly. I'll search for related terms like "underP3Penalty" and "escapeP3Under" to address this. Penalty values should respect the kernel style, with mild location dependence using a kernel scale or hold average.

import re, textwrap, os, json, math, pathlib, pandas as pd path="/mnt/data/Tennislocks_V17.7.3_TOTALS_CLUSTER_GOV_ASYM_UNDERFIX_2026-03-03.txt" len(open(path,'r',encoding='utf-8',errors='ignore').read())

Locating relevant parts in large file

The file is quite large (957k characters), so I'll use regex to locate the relevant sections. I'll search for terms like "underP3Penalty" to identify the necessary portions and make the required updates efficiently.

import re, itertools, pathlib, os, math text=open(path,'r',encoding='utf-8',errors='ignore').read() for pat in ["underP3Penalty","escapeP3Under","totalsTourPolicy","bandSided","underSupport","p3EdgeUnder","p3Under","UNDER rescue","Totals cluster governor","CLUSTER_GOV","TOTALS_CLUSTER"]: m=re.search(pat,text) print(pat, "->", m.start() if m else None)

Extracting key sections for inspection

I’ve pinpointed key areas in the file: totalsTourPolicy around 596k, bandSided around 617k, and underSupport around 619k. I’ll extract content from these regions to inspect and make the necessary adjustments.

def snippet(start, length=2000): return text[start:start+length] print(snippet(595800, 2500))

Adding missing keys and inspecting related functions

It looks like totalsTourPolicy is missing under-specific keys, so I’ll add underP3Penalty and under rescue thresholds like escapeP3UnderSoft. I'll also inspect the escapeP3 gates since they seem related to over rescue. I’ll look around the underSupport/cluster governor function for relevant location details like p3EdgeUnder.

print(snippet(613800, 8000))

Continuing with under rescue adjustments

I need to continue the code further to implement adjustments for under rescue. This will involve adding specific handling for the rescue thresholds, especially for the underP3Penalty and other related keys. I'll focus on ensuring these fit within the broader tour policy structure.

print(snippet(621000, 9000))

Updating under rescue logic with tour-aware values

Under rescue uses fixed thresholds, which aren't tour-aware. To fix that, we need to:

• Replace the 5.0 penalty with a tour-aware penaltyK, based on the tour config and possibly kernel scale.
• Incorporate tour-aware rescue thresholds and decider caps, adding them to the tour policy (including escapeP3Under and underP3Penalty).

Their request to update thresholds to be tour-aware makes sense, so I'll implement that.

Implementing kernel/32k calibration with user specifications

The user asked for thresholds based on kernel/32k calibration, so I’ll use the values they provided. I considered tweaking them using kernelScale and avgHold calculations, but the user gave exact values, so I’ll stick to those. I'll incorporate a small kernel-based tweak and ensure the parameters are stored correctly in the policy.

Implementing kernel/32k calibration and script update

The user gave clear values for the kernel/32k calibration, so I'll implement those exactly. They also want the script updated, not just instructions, with no use of old codehelpers. I'll handle the update directly, making sure to adjust the penalty values for "UNDER" and remove any outdated functions like bandSided.

Adjusting UNDER penalty and rescue logic

The user wants to ensure the penalty and rescue logic aligns with the updated inputs. I'll adjust the UNDER support to replace the flat 5.0 multiplier and ensure the correct use of escape valves based on policy values. The code should now reflect their new expectations and use the correct decider thresholds.

Updating under rescue logic and cluster adjustments

To better align with the user's instructions, I'll use _cAvg2 as the 2-set center for under rescue and update the decider caps. The policy values will be modified to include penalty multipliers and rescue thresholds for both soft and strong values. I’ll also apply the kernel/32k calibration logic as discussed, ensuring ...

Adjusting clearance thresholds and handling helpers

I'll implement the clearance thresholds from policy—p2ClearStrong and p2ClearSoft—keeping in mind the whole line assumption. If it's a half-line, I might subtract 0.25 as a possible adjustment. Regarding old helpers, it seems my approach should avoid using "diff2" from older logic, unless necessary for fallback when data is missing.

Implementing changes and adjusting functions

The user’s request to eliminate old helper functions means any remnants should be removed, especially those calling the outdated logic. There’s no global duplication of _bandSided_, just a local one in the governor. I'll make replacements, adding new fields to the _totalsTourPolicy_ return object and revising the underSupport formula with the appropriate penalty variable.

Locating the function totalsClusterGovernor

I’m trying to find where the _tourCfg is initialized. It looks like the function starts around line 612k in _applyTotalsClusterGovernor_. I’ll search around that area for the function's beginning and check the snippet to locate where exactly _tourCfg is referenced.

find function name near this code

start = text.rfind("function", 0, 613800) print(start, text[start:start+120])

Locating _tourCfg definition in getTotalsPick

The cluster governor is inside getTotalsPick, so I'll start by inspecting the beginning of that function. I'll focus on the snippet from around line 601847 to 613800 to pinpoint where _tourCfg is defined. Once found, I'll be able to proceed with the necessary adjustments.

extract early part of getTotalsPick near its start until where _tourCfg appears

sub=text[601847:603500] print(sub[:1600]) print("... _tourCfg occurrences", [m.start() for m in re.finditer(r"_tourCfg", sub)][:10])

Searching for _tourCfg assignment in getTotalsPick

It looks like _tourCfg isn't in the early snippet, but I’ve seen it used later, for example with the escape P3 gates and tail gate. I’ll search within the getTotalsPick function for the specific assignment of "_tourCfg =". That should point me to where it’s being declared.

m = re.search(r"var\s+_tourCfg\s*=", text[601847:660000]) m.start() if m else None, (text[601847+m.start():601847+m.start()+120] if m else None)

Checking _tourCfg and related variables

I found that _tourCfg is defined at offset 2866 in the getTotalsPick segment, so it’s available for use. Now, I’ll check the surrounding area to make sure variables like _gtpTourK are correctly set up too. That way, I can verify everything needed for the next steps.

print(text[601847+2700:601847+3200])

Implementing tour configuration for underSupport

I’ll update the underSupport code to make use of _tourCfg. After the _p3EdgeUnder variable, I’ll insert a new _uPenK variable calculation based on _tourCfg. Possibly, I’ll also try a mild adjustment using _kernelScale, but I prefer to avoid drastic changes to the penalty. We can make a minor tweak for better calibration.

Adjusting for constants and thresholds

I'll keep the penalty adjustment simple and deterministic since the user likely expects constants rather than dynamic kernel scaling. For escape thresholds, I'll update the _evDecUnderThr definition to use values from _tourCfg when available, and add a fallback for strong thresholds. For clearance, I'll handle the thresholds similarly with _tourCfg values or defaults.

Refining thresholds and conditions

For the clearance logic, I’ll keep the soft clearance as-is for the standard cases. I’m considering adjusting for half-lines by reducing clearance, but I’ll leave it as is since it wasn’t explicitly mentioned. I’ll then update the rescue block’s conditions, replacing the existing thresholds with those from _tourCfg, while keeping med2 for diagnostics. Finally, I’ll ensure everything is in line with the “no old helpers” request.

Updating underSupport and patching policy objects

I noticed that we still compute _wcUnder but don't use it, which is fine for now. I'll also update how the underSupport function uses _cAvg2 and _p3EdgeUnder. Then, for totalsTourPolicy, we'll patch objects carefully while keeping syntax intact. Using regex, I'll replace the 'flatEdgeGate' line in each tour object, adding necessary fields like 'underP3Penalty'. Each replacement will be tailored based on the specific tour key.

Patching return objects and adjusting variables

To update function returns, I'll replace each return string by finding specific substrings for WTA, CH, ITF, and default tours. Each replacement will add properties, like underP3Penalty, escapeP3Under, and others, with appropriate values for each tour. Additionally, I'll modify getTotalsPick by adjusting the underSupport line and inserting the definition of _uPenK right after the _p3EdgeUnder variable to finalize these updates.

Updating formulas and escape thresholds

I’ll replace the underSupport formula with the new variable _uPenK. If needed, I’ll store it in the diagnostic context for easier troubleshooting. For the under rescue threshold, I plan to update the _evDecUnderThr line based on tour type, adding several new precision variables, including _evDecUnderThrStrong and _evUnderClearStrong. Lastly, I'll ensure the Under rescue block references _cAvg2, which is already defined above.

Updating under rescue block and handling fallback values

I’ll replace the old under rescue condition with new checks that incorporate _evUnderClearStrong and _evUnderClearSoft. To avoid any issues with _cAvg2 being NaN, I’ll add checks for it and, if needed, fall back to med2. I’ll also make sure nothing uses the old helpers and update any relevant sections where 5.0 was used.

find occurrences of '* 5.0' near underSupport

for m in re.finditer(r"* 5.0", text): if 618000 < m.start() < 620000: print("found near", m.start())

Searching for additional occurrences of old helpers

I’ll need to do a broader search for "_p3EdgeUnder * 5.0" and similar expressions. There might be more instances I'm missing. I want to replace all of them with the new approach to avoid any leftover references to old code and ensure everything aligns properly.

matches=[m.start() for m in re.finditer(r"_p3EdgeUnder\s**\s*5.0", text)] len(matches), matches[:10]

Implementing patches

Looks like I've found the singular instance I was looking for. Now it’s time to implement the necessary patch modifications. I'll move forward with the Python code to apply the adjustments as planned, ensuring the changes align perfectly with the updated approach. Time to dive in!

import re, copy, hashlib, datetime, os, textwrap orig=text

def patch_totals_policy(t): # tour configs mapping tour_vals = { 'WTA': dict(underP3Penalty=3.8, escapeP3Under=0.28, escapeP3UnderStrong=0.23, underRescueClearStrong=1.75, underRescueClearSoft=1.25), 'ATP': dict(underP3Penalty=4.0, escapeP3Under=0.30, escapeP3UnderStrong=0.25, underRescueClearStrong=2.0, underRescueClearSoft=1.5), 'CH': dict(underP3Penalty=4.2, escapeP3Under=0.29, escapeP3UnderStrong=0.24, underRescueClearStrong=1.9, underRescueClearSoft=1.4), 'ITF': dict(underP3Penalty=4.6, escapeP3Under=0.31, escapeP3UnderStrong=0.26, underRescueClearStrong=2.1, underRescueClearSoft=1.6), } def add_fields(obj_body, vals): # don't add if already present if 'underP3Penalty' in obj_body or 'escapeP3Under' in obj_body: return obj_body # insert before last property? We'll append at end with preceding comma if needed body=obj_body.rstrip() # ensure body ends with property line; if last non-space ends with ',' it's okay if body.endswith(','): suffix='' else: suffix=',' addition = f"""{suffix} // UNDER policy (kernel/32k calibration) underP3Penalty: {vals['underP3Penalty']}, escapeP3Under: {vals['escapeP3Under']}, escapeP3UnderStrong: {vals['escapeP3UnderStrong']}, underRescueClearStrong: {vals['underRescueClearStrong']}, underRescueClearSoft: {vals['underRescueClearSoft']}""" return body + addition

text
# regex for each return object
def patch_branch(tour_key, pattern):
    vals=tour_vals[tour_key]
    def repl(m):
        body=m.group(1)
        new_body=add_fields(body, vals)
        return m.group(0).replace(body, new_body)
    return re.sub(pattern, repl, t, flags=re.S)
# WTA
t = patch_branch('WTA', r"if\s*$\s*k\s*===\s*'WTA'\s*$\s*\{\s*return\s*\{\s*(.*?)\s*\};\s*\}")
# CH
t = patch_branch('CH', r"if\s*$\s*k\s*===\s*'CH'\s*$\s*\{\s*return\s*\{\s*(.*?)\s*\};\s*\}")
# ITF
t = patch_branch('ITF', r"if\s*$\s*k\s*===\s*'ITF'\s*$\s*\{\s*return\s*\{\s*(.*?)\s*\};\s*\}")
# default: find "return { ... };" at end of function
# We'll patch last return object within _totalsTourPolicy_ only
# We'll locate function and patch within its range
func_start = t.find("function _totalsTourPolicy_")
if func_start==-1: 
    return t
func_end = t.find("}\n\nfunction _totalsStructuralSideConfirms_", func_start)
if func_end==-1:
    func_end = func_start + 5000
func_text = t[func_start:func_end]
# patch default return within func_text
vals=tour_vals['ATP']
def repl_default(m):
    body=m.group(1)
    new_body=add_fields(body, vals)
    return "return {\n" + new_body + "\n  };"
# use regex that matches "return { ... };" with indentation 2 spaces maybe
func_text2 = re.sub(r"return\s*\{\s*(.*?)\s*\};", repl_default, func_text, count=1, flags=re.S)
t = t[:func_start] + func_text2 + t[func_end:]
return t

patched=patch_totals_policy(text)

check if fields added

print('underP3Penalty' in patched[595800:603000], patched.count('underP3Penalty'))

Analyzing patch counts and checking for duplication

It looks like the count is showing 6, but it might actually be 4 due to duplication. The default patch is likely matching the first "return" in a specific branch (like the WTA branch), rather than the default one at the end of the function. I'll carefully inspect to ensure that no branch has been patched multiple times and locate the correct "return" to patch.

Extract totalsTourPolicy snippet from patched

start=patched.find("function totalsTourPolicy") end=patched.find("function totalsStructuralSideConfirms", start) print(patched[start:end][:1800])

Reevaluating patch approach to preserve formatting

It seems like the patch broke the formatting for the WTA object, losing its indentation and causing mismatched braces. The regex solution caused issues, so I’m thinking it's better to manually edit each tour return object inside the function. I’ll locate the original function and rewrite it, preserving the indentation and properly placing the closing braces.

Plan for patching the totalsTourPolicy function

To avoid syntax issues, I’ll replace the entire totalsTourPolicy function with a new version containing the original values and the new fields. I'll start by finding the function’s boundaries, using the start index at "function totalsTourPolicy(" and the end at the next function marker, ensuring proper indentation and incorporating the new properties.

Reconstructing the totalsTourPolicy function

To implement the update, I’ll reconstruct the function, ensuring I keep all original properties and simply add the new ones based on 'WTA', 'CH', 'ITF', and the default. I'll also apply the changes to ensure consistency, especially with comments about "33k calibration." It's important the function handles the tour values correctly with taperTourKey. Let’s proceed!

orig=text # reset

replace totalsTourPolicy function entirely

start=orig.find("function totalsTourPolicy") end=orig.find("function totalsStructuralSideConfirms", start) start, end

Ensuring proper function replacement

The function is 1640 characters long. I'll grab the original function code to make sure I can replace it correctly. This way, I can guarantee all changes we make are accurate and nothing gets missed in the process. Let’s take the next step with the source code!

orig_policy=orig[start:end] print(orig_policy)

Building the new function string

Perfect, now I’ll start building the new function string. This will allow us to make the required changes while keeping everything intact and accurate. I'll ensure the new properties are added correctly without affecting the rest of the function’s structure. Time to put the plan into action!

new_policy = """function totalsTourPolicy(tour) { var k = taperTourKey(tour); if (k === 'WTA') { return { deadPO: 0.480, deadPU: 0.480, minLeanPO: 0.550, minLeanPU: 0.550, confHigh: 0.60, confMid: 0.54, escapeP3: 0.44, escapeP3High: 0.50, p2Gate: 0.55, p2High: 0.60, p3Gate: 0.46, p3High: 0.51, tailGate: 0.14, tailHigh: 0.20, clusterTail30: 0.09, clusterTail31: 0.060, clusterTail35: 0.025, flatEdgeGate: 0.08, // UNDER policy (kernel/32k calibration) underP3Penalty: 3.8, escapeP3Under: 0.28, escapeP3UnderStrong: 0.23, underRescueClearStrong: 1.75, underRescueClearSoft: 1.25 }; } if (k === 'CH') { return { deadPO: 0.482, deadPU: 0.482, minLeanPO: 0.552, minLeanPU: 0.552, confHigh: 0.59, confMid: 0.53, escapeP3: 0.42, escapeP3High: 0.48, p2Gate: 0.54, p2High: 0.59, p3Gate: 0.45, p3High: 0.50, tailGate: 0.15, tailHigh: 0.21, clusterTail30: 0.085, clusterTail31: 0.058, clusterTail35: 0.022, flatEdgeGate: 0.09, // UNDER policy (kernel/32k calibration) underP3Penalty: 4.2, escapeP3Under: 0.29, escapeP3UnderStrong: 0.24, underRescueClearStrong: 1.9, underRescueClearSoft: 1.4 }; } if (k === 'ITF') { return { deadPO: 0.485, deadPU: 0.485, minLeanPO: 0.555, minLeanPU: 0.555, confHigh: 0.58, confMid: 0.52, escapeP3: 0.46, escapeP3High: 0.52, p2Gate: 0.59, p2High: 0.64, p3Gate: 0.48, p3High: 0.54, tailGate: 0.18, tailHigh: 0.24, clusterTail30: 0.10, clusterTail31: 0.070, clusterTail35: 0.030, flatEdgeGate: 0.10, // UNDER policy (kernel/32k calibration) underP3Penalty: 4.6, escapeP3Under: 0.31, escapeP3UnderStrong: 0.26, underRescueClearStrong: 2.1, underRescueClearSoft: 1.6 }; } return { deadPO: 0.475, deadPU: 0.475, minLeanPO: 0.545, minLeanPU: 0.545, confHigh: 0.62, confMid: 0.56, escapeP3: 0.40, escapeP3High: 0.46, p2Gate: 0.56, p2High: 0.61, p3Gate: 0.44, p3High: 0.49, tailGate: 0.16, tailHigh: 0.22, clusterTail30: 0.08, clusterTail31: 0.055, clusterTail35: 0.020, flatEdgeGate: 0.08, // UNDER policy (kernel/32k calibration) underP3Penalty: 4.0, escapeP3Under: 0.30, escapeP3UnderStrong: 0.25, underRescueClearStrong: 2.0, underRescueClearSoft: 1.5 }; } """

Replace in original text

patched = orig[:start] + new_policy + "\n\n" + orig[end:]

sanity check occurrences

print(patched.count("function totalsTourPolicy"), patched.count("underP3Penalty"))

Patching the function's totals section

Alright, I’m focusing on the four occurrences for each branch, including the default. I’ll patch the getTotalsPick cluster governor section next, making sure to insert _uPenK after the _p3EdgeUnder line. I’ll find the exact substring in the original, craft a pattern for insertion, and apply the necessary changes carefully!

locate the segment with _p3EdgeUnder

idx=patched.find("var _p3EdgeUnder") idx, patched[idx:idx+200]

Inserting and replacing lines in the function

I’ll insert at the right index right after the _p3EdgeUnder line. I’ll replace the target string, adding the _uPenK line. Then, I’ll move on to replacing the underSupport formula. I'll search for the exact segment for the formula to make sure the replacement is accurate. Let’s do this!

u_idx=patched.find("? (line - _cAvg2) - (_p3EdgeUnder * 5.0)") u_idx

Replacements and threshold adjustments

I’ll replace (_p3EdgeUnder * 5.0) with (_p3EdgeUnder * _uPenK) as planned. Then, I’ll locate the var _evDecUnderThr = line to apply the same patch there. I’ll search for the relevant substring to make sure everything matches perfectly. Time to make these updates!

thr_idx=patched.find("var _evDecUnderThr =") thr_idx, patched[thr_idx:thr_idx+120]

Updating the rescue block

Next, we’ll replace the single line var _evDecUnderThr = ... with a block that includes the new variables, keeping the following newline. We’ll match and replace the exact line using regex. After that, I’ll focus on the "If 3-set chance is very low" snippet in the rescue block and patch that. Time to locate and adjust!

block_pat="If 3-set chance is very low and 2-set median is safely under the line" bi=patched.find(block_pat) bi

Adding print statements

I think it’s time to add some print statements around the change. This will help me track the process and ensure everything is working as expected. I’ll place them in critical spots to check readings before and after applying the updates. Let’s get that in place.

print(patched[624250:624700])

Preparing for regex replacement

I need to replace the inner if conditions with new variables and _cAvg2. I'll use regex substitution, but I'll need to be careful because of the truncated "bandUnder" line and others. I’ll inspect the entire block up until the closing braces to ensure everything gets updated correctly.

print(patched[624250:624950])

Modifying the block

I'm going to update the block to check Number.isFinite(p3Under) and Number.isFinite(line) first. Then, I'll use _cAvg2 with med2 as a fallback, but we'll relax the requirement for med2. We'll just check if _cAvg2 or med2 is finite. Time to implement this!

patched2=patched

insert _uPenK after _p3EdgeUnder line

needle = "var _p3EdgeUnder = Number.isFinite(p3Adj) ? p3Adj : p3;\n\n var _wcOver" insert = "var _p3EdgeUnder = Number.isFinite(p3Adj) ? p3Adj : p3;\n\n // UNDER decider-risk penalty (tour-aware; kernel/32k calibration)\n var _uPenK = (_tourCfg && Number.isFinite(_tourCfg.underP3Penalty)) ? Number(_tourCfg.underP3Penalty)\n : ((_cbTourK === 'WTA') ? 3.8 : (_cbTourK === 'CH') ? 4.2 : (_cbTourK === 'ITF') ? 4.6 : 4.0);\n\n var _wcOver" if needle not in patched2: raise ValueError("needle not found for uPenK insert") patched2 = patched2.replace(needle, insert, 1)

replace flat 5.0 multiplier

patched2 = patched2.replace("(_p3EdgeUnder * 5.0)", "(_p3EdgeUnder * _uPenK)", 1)

replace _evDecUnderThr line with block

thr_line = "var _evDecUnderThr = (_cbTourK === 'WTA') ? 0.28 : (_cbTourK === 'CH') ? 0.29 : (_cbTourK === 'ITF') ? 0.31 : 0.30;" thr_block = "var _evDecUnderThr = (_tourCfg && Number.isFinite(_tourCfg.escapeP3Under)) ? Number(_tourCfg.escapeP3Under)\n : ((_cbTourK === 'WTA') ? 0.28 : (_cbTourK === 'CH') ? 0.29 : (_cbTourK === 'ITF') ? 0.31 : 0.30);\n var _evDecUnderThrStrong = (_tourCfg && Number.isFinite(_tourCfg.escapeP3UnderStrong)) ? Number(_tourCfg.escapeP3UnderStrong)\n : (Number.isFinite(_evDecUnderThr) ? (_evDecUnderThr - 0.05) : NaN);\n var _evUnderClearStrong = (_tourCfg && Number.isFinite(_tourCfg.underRescueClearStrong)) ? Number(_tourCfg.underRescueClearStrong)\n : ((_cbTourK === 'WTA') ? 1.75 : (_cbTourK === 'CH') ? 1.9 : (_cbTourK === 'ITF') ? 2.1 : 2.0);\n var _evUnderClearSoft = (_tourCfg && Number.isFinite(_tourCfg.underRescueClearSoft)) ? Number(_tourCfg.underRescueClearSoft)\n : ((_cbTourK === 'WTA') ? 1.25 : (_cbTourK === 'CH') ? 1.4 : (_cbTourK === 'ITF') ? 1.6 : 1.5);" if thr_line not in patched2: raise ValueError("thr_line not found") patched2 = patched2.replace(thr_line, thr_block, 1)

replace under rescue inner block

old_block = """ if (Number.isFinite(p3Under) && Number.isFinite(med2) && Number.isFinite(line)) { // If 3-set chance is very low and 2-set median is safely under the line, promote to STRONG/SOFT if (p3Under <= (_evDecUnderThr - 0.05) && med2 <= (line - 2.0)) { bandUnder = "STRONG"; } else if (p3Under <= _evDecUnderThr && med2 <= (line - 1.5)) { bandUnder = "SOFT"; } }""" new_block = """ if (Number.isFinite(p3Under) && Number.isFinite(line)) { // If 3-set chance is very low and the 2-set lane sits clearly under the line, promote to STRONG/SOFT. // Use the 2-set center (avg2set when available; otherwise median2set). var _u2c = Number.isFinite(_cAvg2) ? _cAvg2 : med2; if (Number.isFinite(_u2c)) { if (p3Under <= _evDecUnderThrStrong && _u2c <= (line - _evUnderClearStrong)) { bandUnder = "STRONG"; } else if (p3Under <= _evDecUnderThr && _u2c <= (line - _evUnderClearSoft)) { bandUnder = "SOFT"; } } }""" if old_block not in patched2: raise ValueError("old under rescue block not found") patched2 = patched2.replace(old_block, new_block, 1)

sanity: check there is no '* 5.0' left in underSupport area

assert "_p3EdgeUnder * 5.0" not in patched2 print("done patches. underP3Penalty count:", patched2.count("underP3Penalty"), "uPenK present:", "var _uPenK" in patched2)

Verifying underP3Penalty count

The count is now 6 instead of 4, likely due to extra occurrences, like in comments or other sections we touched. Maybe it’s in policy objects or the _uPenK line too. I'll quickly check for its additional mentions, especially if it was added in a comment or somewhere else. Let's confirm.

find all occurrences indices around underP3Penalty in patched2

idxs=[m.start() for m in re.finditer("underP3Penalty", patched2)] idxs[:10], len(idxs)

Checking occurrences of underP3Penalty

The indices likely correspond to four properties, possibly including WTA, CH, ITF, and default. The two occurrences at 619435 and 619470 could be from _uPenK with 'underP3Penalty'. I'll check if there’s another mention in a comment or around the ctx assignment line. Let's pinpoint it for clarity.

print(patched2[619380:619520])

Verifying code correctness and rescue thresholds

The line contains 'underP3Penalty' twice, referencing both _tourCfg.underP3Penalty and Number(_tourCfg.underP3Penalty). Now, I need to check the indentation and ensure no syntax errors. I'll also confirm the totalsTourPolicy function appears once. I'll verify there are no old helpers and review other rescue thresholds as mentioned. Looks like we're good to go!

Reviewing adjustments based on feedback

The updates are mostly done: UNDER rescue thresholds are now tour-aware, and I addressed the kernel/32k calibration for the escape valve. There's also the cluster explanation that’s been implemented. I need to double-check that no old helpers are used. The _wcUnder can stay, since it's stored but not used. A lint check would be ideal, but I’ll start by making sure there are no bracket mismatches in the code changes.

Checking syntax and running a quick compile

I'll check if the modified code section is syntactically valid by ensuring brace balance. Running a JS parser is an option, but it might not be installed, so I'll try using node --check for syntax validation. I’ll use a container to execute it and confirm that everything compiles correctly.

bash -lc node --version

Validating syntax with Node

I’ll write the updated code to a temporary .js file and run node --check to ensure the syntax is valid. Even though the file is meant for Apps Script, which includes custom global variables like SpreadsheetApp, Node should still handle it fine. We’ll go ahead and test by running the check.

out_path="/mnt/data/Tennislocks_V17.7.3_TOTALS_CLUSTER_GOV_ASYM_UNDERFIX_2026-03-03_KERNEL32K.txt" with open(out_path,'w',encoding='utf-8') as f: f.write(patched2) out_path

bash -lc node --check /mnt/data/Tennislocks_V17.7.3_TOTALS_CLUSTER_GOV_ASYM_UNDERFIX_2026-03-03_KERNEL32K.txt

Preparing file for Node check

Node’s --check expects a .js file, but I think I can specify --input-type=commonjs for other formats like .txt. However, to keep things simple, I'll just copy the contents to a .js file and run the check that way. Seems like the easiest approach for now.

bash -lc cp /mnt/data/Tennislocks_V17.7.3_TOTALS_CLUSTER_GOV_ASYM_UNDERFIX_2026-03-03_KERNEL32K.txt /mnt/data/tmp_check.js && node --check /mnt/data/tmp_check.js

Preparing file for user and verifying changes

No syntax errors mean everything’s good! Now, I need to provide the file as a downloadable link. Since the user requested a .txt file, I’ll make sure it’s correctly formatted and accessible. I also need to confirm that we didn’t use any old helpers or break anything with the formula changes—looks like we're in the clear with _uPenK and other related updates.

Thought for 8m 30s