Reviewing existing draft
I’m examining the current paper.tex file to restructure it according to IISML review comments, focusing on ICML main 8 pages.
Checking file status
Verifying file and noting its size. This snippet likely previews content.
Mapping the structure
I'm digging into the ICML example template, identifying distinct sections.
Restructuring the document
I’m rethinking the document to ensure clarity and flow, focusing on intro, problem setup, error decomposition, core theory, method, experiments, and related work/limitations.
Highlighting key points
I’m emphasizing significant elements in the introduction to gather user, content, and learning ideas.
Investigating truncation causes
I’m thinking through why the text is clipped: Python image preview, file confines, or anonymization for privacy.ündet all together by inspecting the file's context around the "Budget-Aware Gating" section.
Structuring the document
I'm rethinking the organization of the document, considering sections like "Problem Setup and Error Decomposition" and "Core Theory: Error Budget and Propagation," and integrating the algorithm "Budget-aware gating and hierarchical restoration."
Evaluating benefits
I’m listing the positive aspects of hierarchical restoration.
Assessing structure
OK, let me see. The method section is missing. The theory-heavy intro needs restructuring. эксперименты раздел нужно улучшить.
Restructuring experiments
I’m thinking through restructuring the experiments section to align with ICML expectations, including placeholders for future experiments and adjusting theoretical sections.
Verifying template accuracy
I’m checking the abstract content in the template, comparing it to the updated version. Adjustments to default text are being made in lines 137-140.
Refining the focus
Updating the abstract to emphasize method effectiveness and benchmark results, while avoiding fabricated numbers, paves the way for a neutral, optimal approach.
Weighing options
Considering a placeholder anonymized title and possibly condensing the main body into 8 pages while examining the \appendix placement.
Setting the stage
I’m piecing together the main body and appendix sections, focusing on the Table of Notations and experiments. This involves examining the specific sections and their sequence.
Organizing sections
I’m mapping out the sections in the appendix, noting the duplication of "Table of Notations" and its relevance to detailed content.
Investigating section duplicates
I noticed multiple sections repeating. This might be due to repeated appendix entries or sections enclosed in comments. I'll sift through the file in detail to pinpoint the exact cause.
Checking for duplicate content
OK, let me see. The two Table of Notations sections imply that appendix content might be duplicated, likely by accident, around line 1403.
Adjusting my approach
I’m noting a potential issue with the table of notations section starting at line 1403, which might not be commented out as initially thought. I’ll print lines 1396-1410 to clarify this.
Summarizing the realignment of theory sections to emphasize experiments and compress proofs for clarity.
Shifting focus
I’m pulling together insights from the Error Decomposition section to explore the next phase of the analysis.
Taking a closer look
I’m examining the remaining lines within the Error Decomposition section to confirm if it’s completely commented out. This review will clarify my understanding of the current state.
Examining text clarity
I'm pulling together lines devoid of comments in the Error Decomposition section, ensuring no uncommented text disrupts the narrative. This highlights the need for precise documentation without unnecessary omissions.
Locating line numbers
Mapping positions to line index and calculating line number starts around 19746. Progress is steady and seems to align well.
Pulling together insights
Consulting lines 289-340, the Error Decomposition section offers a detailed analysis of the problem’s intricate causes. Progressing through each root cause, I’m staying focused on identifying system conditions.
Identifying active sections
I’m piecing together the sections in the document by ignoring lines that start with %. This reveals which sections are commented out versus active.
Restructuring theory
I'm identifying key sections to compress and reformat, integrating, and focusing on critical elements.
Expanding the scope
Mapping out content lines 178-260 for a detailed analysis.
Clarifying the theorem
I’m piecing together the details of Theorem 1's background and conditions, ensuring it aligns with block invariance from lines 240 onward.
Analyzing theorem concepts
I'm examining theorem principles such as prefix and block invariance, shown in ellipses and placeholders, and planning to assess Propositions further.
Mapping out content
OK, let me see. I’m planning to analyze the length and content of the section, focusing on key equations and specific terms for a detailed review.
Focusing on single-layer insights
I'm analyzing the geometric/dynamic decomposition in the Single-Layer Error Analysis section to refine the key decomposition and bounds.
Examining chunk extension
Breaking down the process and addressing attention error propagation through lines 480-600.
Investigating Multi-Layer section
OK, let me see. I’m noting the ellipses around line 486 and focusing on the intriguing Multi-Layer section between lines 619 and 680.
Isolating key insights
I’m outlining the process of extracting the main equation and any theorems from the Multi-Layer section to understand the primary results better.
Tweaking visual details
OK, let me see. I'm adjusting the red text and boxing EQ:energy-safe. Next, I'll move on to sports equipment and scout the Multi-Layer section.
Evaluating the shift
Considering placing the unifying section next to the related work table.
Enhancing the system
I’m focusing on a system that reuses KV cache across contexts, ensuring error management and dynamic gating for efficiency.
Integrating hierarchical restoration
I’m refining the algorithm to include hierarchical restoration for dynamic drift, ensuring lower layers are recomputed while higher layers reuse cached values, optimizing accuracy and efficiency.
Including algorithmic packages
Pondering adding algorithmic packages. Review lines 15-40 for potential integration.
Search initiated
I’m starting with "usepackage{algorithm}"—this helps locate relevant algorithm and algorithmic packages.
Investigating algorithm package
Hm, that's interesting. The template has \newcommand{\theHalgorithm}, but the algorithm package might need re-evaluation. I'll search for updates.
Ensuring algorithm compatibility
I’m gathering info on adding algorithm packages for ICML style, mindful of conflicts with \theHalgorithm and considering tabularx for table formatting.
Retaining xcolor
I’m making sure xcolor is loaded for \textcolor.
Restructuring the document
I'm updating the title, abstract, and adding a new section on "Problem Setup and Notation." Also, "Core Theory" is being consolidated. Progressing to integrate "Method" and experiments.
Strategizing document refinement
I'm focusing on clarity and relevance by restructuring the main body to include minimal background and theory, while intricate sections are condensed and moved to the appendix for thorough inclusion.
Refining theorem statements
I'm moving proofs to the appendix and refining theorem statements in the main body to maintain clarity. Progress is steady, with the focus on highlight key concepts.
Examining definitions
OK, let me break this down: the Propositions section stretches from line 360 to 480, including key definitions and some commented elements.
Identifying Propositions
The Propositions section includes active lines and commented-out lemmas. Goals: identify active lines from 202 to 483, focusing on definitions and theorem statements beyond line 216.
Taking a closer look
I’m examining the effects and potential of active lines around curtains. It’s fascinating to see their aesthetic influence.
Examining definitions
I'm mapping out definitions and theorems, noting truncated lines around 208 to 240, and planning further inspection.
Pinpointing Proposition 1
I’m identifying lines 231 onwards as part of Proposition 1, focusing on prefix invariance, and preparing to search for its definition.
Assessing Proposition 1
I'm analyzing the various propositions to form conclusions.
Streamlining documents
I’m compressing proofs to appendices and adding highlights for zero-error baseline results. Exploring single-layer analysis reduction.
Adjusting the approach
I'm working through refining the single-layer and multi-layer sections by focusing on method orientation and precision, aiming to streamline and clarify the core concepts.
Enhancing clarity and structure
Focusing on streamlining the paper by adding a methods section, integrating experiments, and likely adding essential theoretical results.
Assessing LaTeX document
I'm gathering info on the new LaTeX doc, checking for bibliography and structuring possibilities.
Locating \icmltitle
I’m piecing together where \icmltitle might be in the bibliography. Let me see.
Reviewing latex content
I’m thinking through the request for a complete latex document, considering manual edits, and ensuring consistency with suggestions. Adjustments include updating the title, adding packages, and restructuring sections.
Updating sections
I’m working through the ICML template, focusing on sections like Introduction, Problem Setup, Core Theory, Method, and Experiments. Each part is carefully crafted to incorporate suggestions and maintain clarity.
Piecing together experiments
I’m detailing sections on experiments, including setup, throughput/latency, speed-quality tradeoff curves, ablations, and theory verification. Placeholder figures or tables are also addressed.
Balancing content
I’m considering keeping Proposition 1 proof brief in the main text while adding a detailed theoretical framework in the appendix. This ensures focused experiments and avoids content dilution.
Streamlining content
Clearing up content by cutting down on assumptions and definitions, which can hint at the importance of clarity.
Examining local storage
I'm piecing together the potential presence of a .bib file in the current working directory. Checking the directory structure to confirm.
Weighing options
I'm mapping out if a bib file is needed to ensure compilation success. Existing citations will be kept; no new citations to avoid errors.
Crafting a citation approach
I'm thinking through placing placeholders like \citep{quest, shadowkv, rocketkv, cam} to keep the document self-contained.
Compiling placeholders
I'm gathering citation keys, streamlining the method and experiments sections, and adjusting the appendix with a more concise "Problem Setup and Notation" and "Core Theory" sections.
Crafting sections
Adding a new method section, enhancing experiments, compressing background, merging propositions and theorems, and optimizing unification. Prioritizing experiments and streamlining the file for clear progress.
Updating sections
I’m enhancing the introduction to highlight contributions and experiments, tweaking the abstract for clarity, and preparing the full document for output with experimental placeholders and updated sections.
Reorganizing introduction
I’m adjusting the introduction to highlight contributions and experimental outcomes, while linking it to the method and experiments. The figure will remain intact.
Thinking it through
I’m piecing together the background section, aiming for clarity and concise assumptions, while preparing the method section and integrating existing content.
Mapping the integration
I’m combining ellipses and text layers into a new Core Theory section. The Unifying section’s expansive table might move to another appendix for clarity.
Restructuring the sections
I'm planning to rename and compress sections, move the big table to the appendix, and integrate key definitions and theorems into the main body for a concise presentation.
Updating references
I’m checking and updating section labels and references, considering new sections like "Method" and "Additional Related Work Unification Table," and ensuring the main body omits appendix content.
Updating sections
I’m revising the document sections, updating titles and removing extensive theorem details to streamline the content.
Refining sections
I’m reshaping the document by moving the "Unifying Existing Methods" section to the appendix and integrating the "Budget-aware gating" method with pseudocode into the "Method" section.
Refining the approach
I'm thinking through hierarchical restoration by recalculating lower layers for recomputed hidden states and reusing cached higher layers' keys/values with linear transport.
Recalculating hidden states
I'm thinking through aligning hidden states and reducing dynamic error by recomputing lower layers while reusing higher layers' cached keys/values. This improves cross-context reuse efficiency.
Refining and integrating
I’m mapping out the integration of hierarchical restoration and budget-aware gating, proposing experiments to evaluate their impact, and ensuring coherence throughout the document.
Investigating truncation
I’m digging into how exactly ellipses appear in Python print outputs due to our environment, trying to determine if they indicate truncation or actual ellipses in the text.
Piecing together the layout
I'm thinking through restructuring the LaTeX document to enhance clarity by refining sections, updating the introduction, and refining the experiments to boost understanding.
Refining the structure
I’m adjusting the LaTeX document by renaming sections and adding subsections. This change will streamline the process of updating content and improving clarity.
Refining and reorganizing
I'm piecing together the alignment of labels and name changes. This involves rearranging sections like 'Methods' and 'Experiments' for clarity, streamlining the overall structure.
Restructuring sections
Transferring the large table and mapping to an appendix, I’m simplifying the main body with a concise related work section and a tiny table.
Piecing together sections
I'm mapping out the order of sections, adding method and related work, aligning experiments with theoretical decomposition, and ensuring references are correctly placed.
Crafting new sections
I’m planning to create a new LaTeX file using the ICML template. This involves restructuring the core theory including single-layer and multi-layer sections, and examining existing equations for reusability.
Confirming equation inclusion
I checked if eq:key_error_bound is commented. It’s not until further lines, ensuring accurate extraction.
Evaluating truncation
Haven’t used printed lines around 470-620 due to truncation. Now considering printing between 540-570 to ensure visibility.
Marking key sections
I'm pinpointing the "Key Reuse Error Bound" subsection and expanding the document to 4000 characters around it.
Locating active content
OK, let me see, I’m figuring out where the active equation is by identifying the label eq:key_error_bound. Found it on line 557.
Assessing the status
I'm working through two positions: 29367, which is commented, and 31987, which is still active.
Updating content
I’m enhancing the document structure, integrating new metrics, shifting assumptions to the appendix, and preserving crucial labels for cross-referencing theorems. This maintains clarity and importance throughout.
Refining proofs and layout
I’m condensing theorems and propositions, transitioning proofs to the appendix, and adjusting sections to maximize page efficiency while keeping the main body concise and maintaining reference formatting.
Revamping document structure
I’m enhancing the document by adding sections, tweaking section headings, and refining the layout to ensure efficiency and adherence to concise and comprehensive communication.
Refining sections
I’m updating section headings, adding new ones, and restructuring to boost clarity. Moving unifying methods to the appendix while adjusting cross-references ensures a concise and comprehensive main body.
Charting options
Considering table reference labels for flexible navigation, I'll explore various possibilities to identify a suitable one.
Refining the structure
I’m enhancing the document by refining the preamble, updating sections, and integrating content through string operations and Python scripting, ensuring a seamless and comprehensive flow.
Navigating the tweaks
Refining the document by installing algorithm packages, modifying titles and sections, relocating unification sections to the appendix, and blending experiments content with existing findings for a cohesive structure.
Optimizing page layout
Striving to avoid forced new pages before references, which might waste vital space in the 8-page limit, by removing \newpage commands and managing the appendix layout effectively.
Adjusting the strategy
I'm noting that using a lambda to return new_abs avoids escape sequence issues in re.sub.
Verifying structure
OK, let me see. I’m thinking through the main sections of the file: method, experiments, related work, limitations, etc., all separated by subheadings, with the appendix at the end.
Noticing gaps
I'm pulling together that the "Working regime assumptions" section is missing. Despite trying to compress the "Problem Setup" section, the pattern didn't match, leaving the bullet list unchanged.
Ensuring clarity
I’m checking appendix labels for sections like appendix_attention_tech and app:unification, verifying their relevance and accuracy. Progressing towards completion.
Refining the chapter
I’m streamlining the working regime block to a brief paragraph and relocating the bullet list to an appendix. Adjusting LaTeX macros for consistency is required.
Investigating macros
I'm thinking through the use of \dir and \iso in the preamble, which might be macros.
Examining existing tools
I’m working through the \dir and \iso macros, ensuring they fit perfectly with our requirements.
Confirming labels
I’m confirming the use of LaTeX labels and references like \widehat{\widetilde{k}}^{(l),\dir} and Appendix~\ref{appendix_attention_tech} for technical accuracy.
Verifying appendices
I’m mapping out the existence of a label in Appendix~\ref{appendix_decomp} and checking its references in the method and single-layer section.
Revising figures and labels
I’m working through refining figure environments and labels, considering placeholders to avoid compile errors, and ensuring consistent referencing across sections.
Adjusting formatting
I’m removing \newpage before bibliography and considering the role of \appendix in the appendix section.
Fixing details
Patching figure environment and updating methods. Progress is steady and methodically addressing issues as they arise.
Finalizing compilation
OK, let me see. Double-checking for syntax errors, handling missing bibliography and images, and considering placeholders for images. Progress is steady and intriguing.
Considering macros
I'm thinking through defining a \maybeincludegraphics macro to conditionally handle missing images in LaTeX, aiming for minimal modifications and ensuring smooth compilation.
Revisiting file paths
I’m noting the shift to intro3.pdf from img_1.pdf. By wrapping the figure line, I ensure the file inclusion is conditional, catering to the need.
Manually adjusting the process
After truncating output lines, I noticed the \includegraphics line at 142 didn't appear. Piecing together the context, I will manually add a conditional to ensure proper inclusion.
Modifying section layout
My plan is to streamline the Working regime assumptions by summarizing key points in the main text, while the detailed bullet list moves to the appendix.
Inspecting robust patterns
I’m thinking through spotting patterns in comment lines. Using \subsection*{Working regime assumptions, I’ll cautiously identify elements hinting at pattern mismatches.
Analyzing patterns
I'm thinking through a pattern match for \section{Error Budget}. It might not align due to extra whitespace or a lookahead issue. Need to verify if it matches even with whitespace or comments.
Piecing together sections
I’m examining the area around the end index to find \section{Error Budget..., aiming to reconstruct the document.
Crafting regex patterns
I’m refining regex patterns to capture specific content. Adjusting \\s* and adding lookahead for % ========================================================= and \\section{Error Budget.
Questioning regex accuracy
I'm thinking through regex's limited matches due to greedy quantifiers and how LaTeX formatting might affect \section pattern detection across line breaks.
Confirming pattern accuracy
OK, let me see. I’m checking wr_block_pat.search(mod) again to ensure the pattern matches the full document.
Finalizing patch
OK, let me see. After tweaking the pattern with \\s* and double backslashes, the patch is ready. Running it next, to make compression and include the appendix.
Adjusting appendix boundaries
Balancing main content, I transitioned full bullet list to appendix with "app:working-regime" label, ensuring sequence integrity.
Reasoned for 19m 57s
