Deep-EIoU DeepSORT MOT

Below is a detailed, text-based explanation of how Deep-EIoU (a multi-object tracking approach based on an enhanced IoU measure) and DeepSORT (a popular Re-ID-based tracker) can handle multiple object tracking in sports videos. The content covers:

1. Why these two algorithms are suitable,
2. How detection interacts with tracking,
3. The data association mechanisms (including Hungarian Algorithm usage),
4. Challenges such as Illumination Change, Occlusion, and ID Switch.

1. Choice of Two MOT Algorithms & Why They’re Suitable

1.1 Deep-EIoU (Expansion IoU + Deep Features)

Deep-EIoU is a multi-object tracking framework that can incorporate enhanced bounding box overlap metrics (like EIoU) combined with a deep feature extractor for object association. Traditional IoU looks only at the overlapping area between boxes, but EIoU (Expansion IoU) or other enhanced overlap metrics (e.g., CIoU, SIoU) factor in more nuanced geometric constraints (distance between box centers, aspect ratios, etc.). By adding a deep component (either for re-ID or refined association), Deep-EIoU aims to:

1. Improve bounding-box matching: The advanced IoU variant reduces mismatch when objects have slight scale/shape variations.
2. Handle sports scenarios: Rapid player or ball movement can cause bounding boxes to shift drastically. An enhanced IoU-based cost function can be more robust to partial misalignment.
3. Reduce ID switches: If combined with deep appearance embeddings, it can distinguish visually similar players (e.g., same team uniforms).

Hence, Deep-EIoU is suitable where:

• You want a more flexible bounding-box matching approach than plain IoU.
• The environment sees quick changes in object scale or shape (e.g., arms/legs posture changes for players, the ball spinning/changing shape slightly in the bounding box).
• You can incorporate a deep feature to handle appearance or motion cues, further boosting ID continuity.

1.2 DeepSORT

DeepSORT builds on the classic SORT but integrates a deep appearance (Re-ID) module. This means each detection’s crop is passed through a small neural network to produce an embedding. The tracker uses a combined cost of bounding-box IoU + appearance distance to match tracks and detections:

1. Low ID switch rate: Because it looks at each object’s visual features, players wearing the same jersey are less likely to get confused, as the network learns finer details (like subtle color differences, body shape, or other distinctive features).
2. Good for crowded sports: In soccer, basketball, or volleyball, players frequently overlap. Deep appearance cues help maintain identity.
3. Robust to partial occlusions: Even if a bounding box is temporarily small or not a perfect overlap, the deep feature can help confirm it’s the same object.

DeepSORT is suitable when:

• Player identity is crucial (who is who over time).
• Frequent occlusions or uniform similarity cause a standard IoU-based approach to fail.
• You can afford the computational overhead of computing embeddings (a minor cost if you have a GPU or strong CPU).

2. Relationship Between Detection & Tracking

In both Deep-EIoU and DeepSORT, the pipeline starts with object detection on each frame:

1. Detector Outputs: A bounding box set $\{(x, y, w, h)\}$, confidence scores, and potentially class IDs (e.g., “player,” “ball”).
2. Tracker Input: These detections form the “input” for the tracker’s data association step. The tracker tries to match them to existing track states (each track has an ID and expected bounding-box location).

Hence:

• Detection is about finding objects in each frame.
• Tracking is about maintaining consistent IDs over time, so each bounding box from frame $t$ is correctly associated with the bounding box from frame $t-1$ for the same physical object.

In sports contexts, that means the bounding boxes for the same player or ball get linked from frame to frame to produce a trajectory.

3. Assignment Process in Deep-EIoU & DeepSORT

3.1 Deep-EIoU

While Deep-EIoU can differ in implementation, a typical approach is:

1. Predict Track Boxes: Each active track from the previous frame has a predicted bounding box (possibly via a Kalman filter or a simpler constant velocity model).
2. Compute Cost Matrix: For each track-detection pair, compute an EIoU-based distance or cost (1 – EIoU), optionally combined with a deep feature similarity. EIoU typically considers:
   • Overlapping area,
   • Distance between bounding-box centers,
   • Aspect ratio differences, and
   • Possibly rotation or other geometric factors.
3. Hungarian Algorithm: With this cost matrix, the Hungarian Algorithm is applied to find the optimal assignment. Minimizing total cost pairs up tracks and detections so that bounding boxes with high EIoU get matched.
4. Appearance Re-ID (Optional): If a deep embedding is also used, the cost might be an average or weighted sum of the EIoU distance and the embedding distance. This helps differentiate objects if bounding boxes are close in EIoU but belong to different players.

Unmatched tracks might be lost or carried forward for a few frames (if the algorithm allows track re-acquisition). Unmatched detections may initialize new tracks.

3.2 DeepSORT

1. Kalman Filter Prediction: Similar to above, each existing track has a predicted bounding box.
2. Cost Matrix: Each track is compared to each detection, using:
   • IoU distance: If bounding boxes do not overlap, it’s likely not the same object.
   • Appearance distance: The detection crop is fed into a re-ID model, generating a feature vector. The distance between track’s stored embedding and the new detection’s embedding is computed (e.g., cosine distance).
3. Gate & Fuse: Typically, there’s an IoU gating step to discard improbable matches (if IoU is too low) and then a combined cost function for feasible pairs.
4. Hungarian Algorithm: Minimizes the total cost, ensuring each detection is assigned to at most one track and vice versa.
5. Track Update: Matched detections update the track’s bounding box and appearance history. Unmatched detections create new tracks, and unmatched tracks may become inactive if they are not matched for a certain number of frames.

In both cases, the Hungarian Algorithm is a central piece—it is the method that finds the 1-to-1 assignments that minimize total cost across all track-detection pairs.

4. Common Challenges in Sports: Illumination Change, Occlusion, ID Switch

4.1 Illumination Change

• Definition: Shifts in brightness or color distribution—daytime to nighttime, stadium lights turning on/off, overhead shadows, etc.
• Impact:
  1. The detector may produce lower-confidence boxes if the object’s color/contrast changes drastically.
  2. Re-ID models or deep feature extractors might mismatch objects if the color-based features shift.
• Deep-EIoU: If reliant on appearance embeddings, severe lighting changes degrade the embedding’s reliability. However, the EIoU part can still measure bounding-box overlap well if the object’s geometry remains consistent.
• DeepSORT: The deep re-ID embeddings might partially handle color changes (if trained on diverse data), but extreme shifts can still cause confusion or missed matches.

4.2 Occlusion

• Definition: The target is partially or fully blocked (by other players, camera cuts, etc.).
• Impact:
  1. Detections might vanish or produce incomplete bounding boxes.
  2. If the bounding box reappears after occlusion, the tracker can lose continuity and cause ID switches.
• Deep-EIoU: If no bounding box is detected during heavy occlusion, the track might be lost. But a robust approach might keep the track in a “lost” state for a few frames, hoping for re-acquisition with a high EIoU match.
• DeepSORT: The re-ID embedding helps re-link an object post-occlusion, if the bounding box reappears with a similar appearance. However, long occlusions or drastically changed poses can break it.

4.3 ID Switch

• Definition: Two objects swap identities mid-sequence; the same real-world object ends up with a new track ID.
• Why:
  1. Two bounding boxes converge or overlap (e.g., two players crossing paths, or a ball switching from one foot to another).
  2. The tracker’s cost function or gating picks the wrong match, especially if the objects look similar or if detection is inconsistent.
• Deep-EIoU: If EIoU is high for the wrong object (e.g., two players standing close with similarly sized bounding boxes) or if the deep feature is not sufficiently discriminative, an ID switch can occur.
• DeepSORT: Fewer ID switches than purely IoU-based methods, but in a scene with many similar uniforms or large occlusions, the re-ID network can still confuse them.
• Mitigation:
  • Use well-trained re-ID models that can handle subtle differences.
  • Allow short “lost track” states so the tracker doesn’t reassign IDs the instant a detection is missing.
  • Domain-specific constraints (knowing exactly how many players should appear) or additional sensors might help.

Conclusion

1. Deep-EIoU & DeepSORT each offer robust solutions for multiple object tracking in fast-paced sports:

   • Deep-EIoU uses advanced IoU metrics + deep appearance or shape cues, potentially better for bounding-box geometry changes.
   • DeepSORT uses standard IoU + deep re-ID embeddings, strong at distinguishing visually similar players.

2. Detection → Tracking:

   • The bounding boxes from each video frame (with confidence scores) become the tracker’s input for data association.
   • The tracker outputs consistent ID assignments across frames.

3. Data Association:

   • Both rely on a cost matrix (EIoU-based or IoU-based plus embedding distance).
   • The Hungarian Algorithm finds the optimal assignment that minimizes total cost.
   • Tracks get updated or initialized based on these matchings.

4. Challenges:

   • Illumination changes degrade detection confidence and hamper appearance embeddings.
   • Occlusion can interrupt bounding boxes, leading to missed frames and potential ID switches.
   • ID Switch is especially problematic if multiple targets look alike or if occlusion is prolonged.

By combining advanced IoU-based matching (Deep-EIoU) or deep re-ID features (DeepSORT) with a solid detection system, you can track multiple objects (players, balls) more accurately in dynamic, high-occlusion sports environments. The final choice depends on your hardware (GPU vs. CPU), required speed, and how similar or crowded your objects typically are. این جواب را به طور کامل و دقیق به فارسی ترجمه کنید بدون اینکه حتی یک کلمه کم شود و در یک فایل ورد تحویل دهید

Part One - Research
.
Provide at least one improvement method for your tracking algorithm. To do this, you can choose one of the common challenges in object tracking and propose an improvement method to solve this challenge. Explain the details and steps of the algorithm in full. In these two articles, the second article is an improvement of the first. Explain the improvement method in full.

2 Research in general about model optimization methods for delivering models and presenting them as a product. Explain why optimizing models for delivery as a product is necessary. Explain the different categories of methods and the advantages and disadvantages of each category in full.

این پاسخ رو کامل به فارسی ترجمه کن