Searching for patterns
I'm thinking about a 100x100 grid, where each cell is colored but no color exceeds 104 cells. The goal is to identify the smallest row or column span that contains at least three distinct colors.
Crunching the numbers
I'm pulling together the minimal length t that ensures three distinct colors in consecutive squares, considering constraints and aiming for the largest two-colored consecutive square arrangement.
Identifying minimal colors
I'm working out the minimal number of colors to use, noting that clustering squares of the same color could help avoid segments with three distinct colors until a certain length.
Coloring constraints
I’m mapping out a method to ensure no short segment has three colors by coloring the grid so each 1xt or tx1 rectangle has at most two colors. The aim is to find the smallest t where this fails.
Mapping color patterns
I’m working on a strategy to ensure no segment of length t exceeds two colors. By using repeating patterns and adhering to the 104 squares per color limit, consistency can be maintained across the entire grid.
Assessing color usage
I’m thinking through the maximum number of colors in the grid, each limited to 104 squares, and aiming to use just enough colors to maintain patterns without exceeding constraints.
Strategizing block arrangement
I'm thinking through filling each row with smaller blocks, ensuring no segment of length t contains more than two colors, to avoid three distinct colors in any row or column.
Mapping color solutions
I’m working on a diagonal banding approach, ensuring each band contains t−1 squares with only two colors. This method offsets the need for larger blocks and adheres to constraints.
Organizing colors
I'm working through a striped pattern where each row displays blocks of the same color for t−1 squares, then transitions to the next color. This method simplifies maintaining color constraints.
Ensuring color variability
To avoid a segment with three distinct colors, I’m suggesting two-colored placements in each row, cleverly spaced to keep any row segment from spanning more than 2 colors.
Piecing together options
I’m working on a strategic approach to ensure no row or column segment of less than length t has more than 2 colors, aiming to pinpoint the smallest t that guarantees three distinct colors.
Securing color limits
OK, let me see. By segmenting each row into stripes of t−1 squares with repeating patterns, I ensure no consecutive t squares in any row or column exceed 2 colors, aligning with constraints.
Pairing colors
I'm mulling over alternating color pairs across rows, where each pair spans columns 1-50, 51-100, etc., to ensure no segment of length t has more than two colors if t≤50.
Navigating vertical patterns
Interestingly enough, maintaining a two-color limit in vertical segments overcomes challenges of boundary crossing in columns, thanks to each row's alternating color scheme.
Ensuring color constraints
I'm figuring out how to maintain vertical segments of t with just two colors, adhering to the 104 squares per color limit.
Allocating colors
Essentually, each pair of colors is used for two rows, then shifts to the next pair, maintaining the 104 squares per color constraint while ensuring vertical segments don't exceed 2 colors.
Refining color usage
I’m mapping out how to effectively use 50 color pairs, ensuring each pair spans two rows without surpassing the 104 squares per color limit.
Spreading the colors
I'm figuring out how to use 100 distinct colors, each on 100 squares, to ensure they fit within the 104 square per color limit.
Ensuring consistency
I’m thinking through how alternating color pairs for each row ensure no segment of length t has more than two colors. This approach adheres to the 100 distinct colors constraint.
Ensuring color patterns
I’m piecing together that each column's red-and-blue pattern ensures no segment of length t has more than two colors.
Ensuring color balance
I’m figuring out that each t-segment in a column has a maximum of two distinct colors, supported by alternating color patterns every two rows.
Calculating color boundaries
OK, let me see: to get three distinct colors in t squares, you need to cross at least two boundaries of 2-row blocks, making t at least 5.
Crossing boundaries
To ensure a segment of t squares involves three distinct colors, t must exceed 2 and reach at least 5, based on the boundary crossing of 2-row blocks.
Crossing boundaries
I’m mapping out that a column segment of length 5 can span three distinct colors by intersecting two boundaries of 2-row blocks, following the 104 squares per color constraint.
Assessing growth
Taking a closer look at columns reveals that a segment of length 4 can involve three distinct colors, suggesting that no segment of length more than 4 should have three colors.
Modifying the approach
OK, let me see. Coloring each column in 4-block segments might reduce the chance of encountering three distinct colors in a segment of length 4, while adhering to the 104 squares per color constraint.
Working through segments
By coloring each column in 4-block segments, it seems only two distinct colors appear in any 4-length vertical segment, preserving the 104 squares per color rule.
Posing a modification
OK, let me see. By using 4-block columns, a 5-length segment might avoid three distinct colors, ensuring each color adheres to the 104 squares per color rule.
Assessing boundary crossings
By analyzing that each 5-square segment can traverse at most one boundary, it limits the segment to two distinct colors, and each color adheres to the 104 squares per color rule.
Charting a plan
Considering 4-block segments for rows and columns to prevent three distinct colors in a 5-square span. This helps manage each color's usage within the 104 squares per color constraint.
Coloring grids
I'm working through ensuring each color stays under 104 squares. A simpler approach with 4-block color segments is out due to constraints.
Mapping the approach
I'm piecing together a 1x4 block strategy per row, ensuring each color block spans 4 squares and maintains at most 25 blocks per row, adhering to the 104 squares per color limit.
Balancing color swaps
I'm piecing together a plan to evenly distribute colors across 4-square blocks, reusing each color up to 26 times, ensuring variations without surpassing the 104 squares per color limit.
Allocating color blocks
I’m figuring out if 97 distinct colors can sufficiently cover 2,500 4-square blocks, ensuring each color's usage stays within the 104 squares per color constraint.
Assessing color dynamics
I’m comparing the color pattern to a 2D checkerboard and noting that each row segment of length t needs to cross at least 2 color boundaries to ensure three distinct colors.
Mapping color shifts
I’m thinking through whether a 7-square segment consistently crosses two color boundaries. This approach ensures three distinct colors, pivotal for avoiding a segment with three distinct colors.
Assessing the layout
For t=7, a row segment crosses two color boundaries, achieving three distinct colors. The same is true for t=6, but not for t=5.
Evaluating boundary crossings
I'm thinking 5 squares span two color boundaries, achieving 3 distinct colors. Interestingly, both t=6 and t=7 also yield 3 distinct colors in this setup.
Map out possibilities
I'm digging into a 5-square segment that intersects only one boundary, yielding two colors. This ensures no three distinct colors in any five-square segment.
Examining the problem
I'm thinking through avoiding three distinct colors in a segment of length 5. Each row gets 25 color blocks, ensuring no segment of row or col length 5 hits three colors.
Analyzing color shifts
Interestingly enough, each color block spans 4 squares in columns and rows. This pattern avoids three distinct colors in segments up to 5 squares long.
Tracking color shifts
Interestingly enough, each column's color pattern shifts every row, leading to two distinct colors in any 5-row segment. This ensures no three distinct colors in any 3-row segment.
Tracking color shifts
Hmm, I’m thinking about how each column's color scheme changes each row, leading to at least 3 distinct colors in any 5-square segment, making it unavoidable for t=5.
Mapping color patterns
Hmm, I’m thinking about a 4x4 coloring grid with striped patterns to avoid three distinct colors in any 5-square segment horizontally and vertically. This approach might work well.
Mapping color patterns
I'm considering 97 distinct colors to ensure each color is used within the 104 squares per color limit, avoiding three distinct colors in any 5-square segment horizontally and vertically.
Color strategy insights
Mapping out that using 2x2 blocks in a row might cross two boundaries and lead to three distinct colors in a 5-square segment, making it a less effective approach.
Determining spacing
I'm mapping out a method to prevent three distinct colors in a t-length segment by spacing color changes at least t squares apart, avoiding crossings of two boundaries within the segment.
Strategizing color shifts
I'm considering spacing color changes by at least t squares to avoid crossing two boundaries within a t-square segment, ensuring three distinct colors.
Determining color balance
OK, let me see. I’m looking to balance each color block's size, ensuring no color exceeds 104 squares. The number of distinct colors needed remains around 96.
Balancing color usage
I’m considering a 10,000-square board with color blocks of size t, aiming to spread distinct colors evenly without exceeding the 104 squares per color limit.
Mapping color patterns
I'm honing a strategy to ensure uniform color distribution, aiming to prevent three distinct colors in any segment of length t on a 10,000-square board.
Reaching conclusions
I'm piecing together that a segment of length t=5 on a 10,000-square board will inevitably feature three distinct colors, making it a plausible maximum limit.
Mapping color patterns
OK, let's break this down: finding the smallest segment length t to ensure three distinct colors on a 100x100 board, each color used at most 104 times.
Mapping color trends
Let's think this through: instead of focusing on the frequency of color usage on a 100x100 board, the challenge lies in pinpointing the smallest segment length t that guarantees three distinct colors, ensuring the constraints are met effectively.
Pinpointing the threshold
I'm piecing together that the smallest segment length t ensuring three distinct colors in any partition on a 100x100 board, with each color appearing less than 104 times, is likely around t=5 or t=6.
Strategizing color blocks
I’m forming a plan to split each row into 2-square color blocks, ensuring each color block is reused up to 50 times, still fitting within the 104 squares per color constraint.
Determining the feasible range
I'm figuring out that to ensure no color exceeds 104 squares, using about 97 distinct colors, each covering 2 squares and appearing up to 52 times, fits within the constraints.
Mapping column segments
I'm examining how column segments cross boundaries, aiming to ensure no segment of length 5 surpasses two boundaries, which leads me to the conclusion that any segment of that length includes three distinct colors.
Evaluating block patterns
I’m analyzing a 3-square wide block pattern horizontally to avoid three distinct colors in a 5-square segment, while staying within the constraints of each color's usage.
Investigating boundary crossings
I'm thinking deeply about how 4-square segments might straddle two boundaries, possibly creating three distinct colors in a 5-square segment. Let's see how this structure develops further.
Evaluating color patterns
I’m noting that 5-square segments crossed two boundaries, potentially involving three distinct colors. Ensuring three distinct colors in a 5-square segment might need a refined approach.
Assessing segment colors
Piecing together that a 5-square segment inevitably has three distinct colors, due to the constraints and known patterns in grid coloring problems.
Assessing segment colors
Taking a closer look at a 5-square segment, it will have three distinct colors, due to constraints and common patterns in grid coloring problems. This insight guides the solution.
Adjusting my approach
I'm thinking through color placement to avoid three distinct colors in a 5-square segment. Let's explore alternating patterns and uniform columns to manage color usage effectively.
Evaluating color schemes
Interestingly enough, I’m working through a uniform row-color pattern, allocating each color to 100 squares per row, ensuring no color exceeds the 104 square limit.
Organizing the color scheme
OK, here’s the plan: use 100 colors, each covering exactly 100 squares in one row, ensuring no color exceeds the 104 square limit.
Mapping the color layout
OK, let me see. I’m charting 100 colors, each covering exactly 100 squares per row. This setup ensures each color remains within the 104 square limit.
Understanding segment patterns
OK, let me see: using 100 colors, each spanning 100 squares per row, shows any segment of length t will inevitably contain three distinct colors.
Managing color boundaries
Mapping out methods to hide color boundaries, I aim to allocate sufficient colors to ensure each segment of length t inevitably contains three distinct colors.
Addressing color boundaries
Considering how to conceal color boundaries to ensure segments of length t inevitably contain three distinct colors. This leads me to think about improving the color boundary strategy.
Mapping the solution
It's clear that any arrangement will inevitably include a 3-color segment with length t, indicating that t should be 5 or more.
Understanding color patterns
Testing different t values, configurations show that avoiding 3 colors in a t-segment is only possible for t=5 or more.
Thought about 最小正整数 t,持续 2m 33s