请根据附件“ISAC方向2026年工作任务规划_v3_2026.1.22”和“个人绩效承诺书-202...
बनाया गया: 24 फ़रवरी 2026
का उपयोग करके उत्तर दिया गया GPT-5.2 Thinking द्वारा Chat01
बनाया गया: 24 फ़रवरी 2026
का उपयोग करके उत्तर दिया गया GPT-5.2 Thinking द्वारा Chat01
请根据附件“ISAC方向2026年工作任务规划_v3_2026.1.22”和“个人绩效承诺书-2026上半年-张振宇_fyq_zzy”,参考附件“OKR-张振宇-20251203-讨论后”的格式,编写“OKR-张振宇-20260224-初稿”。主要填写OKR中的KRs(关键结果)和To Do List(举措)。要求书写风格尽量和“OKR-张振宇-20251203-讨论后”一致,不要有人工智能的痕迹,要像真人书写。
bash -lc ls -R /home/oai/skills/spreadsheets && sed -n '1,200p' /home/oai/skills/spreadsheets/skill.md
I need to inspect the four uploaded files: planning, performance, OKR template 20251203, and initial draft 20260224. I'll open them to identify the sheets, locate important sections like KRs and To-Dos, and then fill them in. I'll use a tool to analyze the structure, keeping the formatting intact by only editing the necessary values.
import openpyxl, os, pandas as pd, re, math, datetime paths = { "plan":"/mnt/data/ISAC方向2026年工作任务规划_v3_2026.1.22.xlsx", "perf":"/mnt/data/个人绩效承诺书-2026上半年-张振宇_fyq_zzy.xlsx", "okr_ref":"/mnt/data/OKR-张振宇-20251203-讨论后.xlsx", "okr_draft":"/mnt/data/OKR-张振宇-20260224-初稿.xlsx" } {key: os.path.exists(p) for key,p in paths.items()}
def wb_info(path): wb = openpyxl.load_workbook(path, data_only=False) return wb.sheetnames for k,p in paths.items(): print(k, wb_info(p))
Both OKR files seem to share the same sheet names, possibly from the same template. I'll compare them for differences. The draft workbook likely has placeholders, so I’ll focus on inspecting the 'OKR_2025.6.20' sheet. I'll check the relevant rows for KRs and To-Dos by sampling cell values and looking for markers like "KR" or "To Do List".
def find_text(ws, pattern): hits=[] for row in ws.iter_rows(values_only=False): for cell in row: v = cell.value if isinstance(v,str) and pattern in v: hits.append((cell.coordinate,v)) return hits
wb_ref = openpyxl.load_workbook(paths["okr_ref"], data_only=False) ws_ref = wb_ref["OKR_2025.6.20"] hits_kr = find_text(ws_ref,"KR") hits_todo = find_text(ws_ref,"To Do") hits_obj = find_text(ws_ref,"O") len(hits_kr), hits_todo[:10], hits_kr[:20]
The cells show examples with KRs and completion details from the previous period (2025). The user wants to draft new OKRs for 2026-02-24, mainly focusing on KRs and the To-Do list. I’ll inspect the draft workbook, check any filled or blank areas especially near the top, and render the layout.
from artifact_tool import SpreadsheetArtifact
draft_art = SpreadsheetArtifact.load(paths["okr_draft"]) draft_art.recalculate() rendered = draft_art.render(sheet_name="OKR_2025.6.20") rendered[:2], len(rendered)
In the draft sheet, columns A to F are structured with objectives in Column A, KRs in Column B, review in Column C, and To-Do list in Column F. Column D seems reserved for review scoring, possibly for 2026. I'll need to update the KRs for each objective, especially filling in the missing ones, and align the To-Do list in Column F with the objectives in Column A.
The To-Do list for each objective is blank in rows F2-F11. I'll need to ensure the KRs (Column B) and To Do list (Column F) align with the style in the reference OKR file (20251203), which includes more detailed text and metrics. The review column can remain blank for now. I'll check the reference file to see how detailed the KRs should be and match that.
The user specified to focus on KRs and the To-Do list. This suggests we should write full KR descriptions in Column B, similar to the style in the reference OKR-20251203 file, rather than just titles. I'll also ensure the To-Do list has task-oriented bullet points. I'll check the reference file to view how KRs were detailed, especially for 2025.
ref_art = SpreadsheetArtifact.load(paths["okr_ref"]) ref_art.recalculate() ref_render = ref_art.render(sheet_name="OKR_2025.6.20") ref_render
The reference sheet has detailed, multi-line KRs with metrics and deliverables, and the To-Do list is numbered ("1) ..."). Since the draft is simplified, it seems the user wants to update the KRs and To-Do list for 2026 tasks. I'll open the 2026 ISAC plan workbook and review the relevant sheet for data.
plan_wb = openpyxl.load_workbook(paths["plan"], data_only=True) plan_ws = plan_wb["2026年ISAC工作任务"] plan_ws.max_row, plan_ws.max_column
data=[] for r in range(1, plan_ws.max_row+1): row=[] for c in range(1, plan_ws.max_column+1): v=plan_ws.cell(r,c).value row.append(v) data.append(row) df_plan=pd.DataFrame(data) df_plan.head(20)
The task plan includes Zhenyu in various tasks across categories, like Task 1, 2.1, 3.2, and platform tasks 4.2 and 4.4. The performance commitment mentions "2026上半年," suggesting this is for the first half of 2026. The draft OKR might not need to update the review date, but we will focus on tasks from the first half of 2026.
For Zhenyu's OKRs, I’ll include tasks like the 5G-A R20 base station evaluation (2025.8-2026.3), platform tasks due by February and March 2026, and potential ITU self-evaluation contributions by August 2026. The first-half performance commitment may focus on 6G document contributions and platform improvements. I'll check the workbook for specifics on objectives.
perf_wb = openpyxl.load_workbook(paths["perf"], data_only=True) for s in perf_wb.sheetnames: ws = perf_wb[s] print(s, ws.max_row, ws.max_column)
ws = perf_wb["非矩阵式项目考核用表"]
data=[] for r in range(1, ws.max_row+1): row=[] for c in range(1, ws.max_column+1): row.append(ws.cell(r,c).value) data.append(row) df_perf = pd.DataFrame(data) df_perf.head(30)
The sheet may have merged cells which aren't showing text in the dataframe. I’ll check for project entries, possibly in rows 4-8, but they might be hidden due to merged cells. I’ll use openpyxl to examine the cells with values, skipping the headers, to find the relevant data.
def list_nonempty(ws): items=[] for row in ws.iter_rows(): for cell in row: v=cell.value if v is None: continue if isinstance(v,str) and v.strip()=="": continue items.append((cell.coordinate,v)) return items
non = list_nonempty(perf_wb["非矩阵式项目考核用表"]) len(non), non[:50]
It seems like the first sheet doesn't have specific project objectives filled in—perhaps it's just a blank template. I'll check the second sheet, "矩阵式项目考核用表", to see if it contains the content I need. I'll list out the non-empty values to locate potential project objectives.
non2 = list_nonempty(perf_wb["矩阵式项目考核用表"]) len(non2), non2[:100]
The performance commitment lists clear objectives for the first half of 2026, such as ISAC platform development, ST consistency research, and standard contributions. This fits with the OKR template, with key results tailored for these objectives. I'll draft the OKR file considering both the plan and performance goals, focusing on tasks like 5G-A R20 evaluation and 6G sensing. I'll update the KRs to align with specific platform features and contributions.
The performance commitment mentions technical research, such as 6G sensing measurements and physical layer procedures, contributing to documents and patents. For O1 ("提升标准影响力"), KR1 will focus on proposals, like at least X proposals for 3GPP R20 ISAC evaluation. We’ll specify contributions, such as “2 papers” for RAN1 R20 ISAC. I’ll base these numbers on the previous year’s standards work.
For KR1, we need realistic numbers for contributions: “3 papers” seems a bit high for the first half-year, so I'll adjust it to “3 3GPP R20 proposals,” plus support for domestic IMT-2030 and ITU. KR2 will focus on effective presentations. KR3 involves pre-and post-meetings analysis. For KR4, the focus is on proposal quality, ensuring "2 proposals" are accepted. Regarding patents, KR1 expects 2 filed patents by the first author.
For KR2, I’ll focus on the patent quality, ensuring that at least 1 patent translates into a standard proposal and passing two rounds of review. The "passing rate" for new patents should be at least 50%.
For KR3, platform development will cover consistency and testing with specific deadlines, and an additional KR for stability and joint debugging.
Also, it seems there's overlap with performance-related tasks for technical research; I’ll clarify these as separate where needed.
For O3, I’ll focus on platform development and metrics, like completing consistency and tracking functions. I’ll ensure involving scenario expansions and supporting R20 performance evaluations.
For O4, I'll add professional growth including deepening platform knowledge and enhancing English skills, making all KRs measurable. Tasks across these will be updated in the draft workbook for clarity.
draft_wb = openpyxl.load_workbook(paths["okr_draft"]) ws = draft_wb["OKR_2025.6.20"] ws.merged_cells.ranges
I need to edit the merged cells for KRs and To Do list, with specific entries for each objective, ensuring consistent style. I'll format each KR with a "KR1: ..." label and line breaks for clarity. The To Do list will follow a numbered format, with proper description and metrics.
I’ll keep the "Review (2025.12)" header as it wasn't specifically changed. The "考核页" might need an update, and I’ll consider focusing only on KRs and the To-Do list for the OKR sheet. I’ll gather more info from the plan file to reflect relevant tasks for Zhenyu, ensuring accuracy.
hits=[] for row in plan_ws.iter_rows(): for cell in row: v=cell.value if isinstance(v,str) and ('振宇' in v or '张振宇' in v): hits.append((cell.coordinate,v)) hits[:20], len(hits)
The plan sheet mentions Zhenyu in tasks 1, 2.1, 2.2, 3.3, 3.2, and platform tasks 4.2, 4.3, 4.4. I’ll need more context on these tasks, so I’ll check the corresponding rows to gather the task descriptions and their timelines from the plan sheet. I'll focus on rows like D3 etc. for clarity.
def row_values(ws, r, maxc=20): return [ws.cell(r,c).value for c in range(1,maxc+1)] for r in [3,4,5,8,11,12,13]: print("row",r,row_values(plan_ws,r,20))
The tasks have specific due dates, and there's also a 4.1 tracking task, though it's assigned to 荣一 in row 10. But since Zhenyu is responsible for implementing the tracking system in the performance commitment, he likely supports it. We should consider adding it to his KR. I'll open rows 9-14 to clarify details.
for r in range(9,15): print(r, row_values(plan_ws,r,5))
Zhenyu owns tasks 4.2 and 4.4, supports 4.3, and may contribute to the tracking task. To match the style, we’ll format KRs like the reference document: starting with "KR1:", followed by tasks, metrics, and timeliness (e.g., "2026上半年"). I'll check the draft file 'OKR-20260224-初稿' to see if the KR details are already partially filled.
cells = ["B2","B3","B4","B5","B6","B7","B8","B9","B10","F2","F3","F4","F5","F6","F7","F8","F9","F10"] {c: ws[c].value for c in cells}
The KRs are placeholders, with only O1 having titles. Most of the To-Do list is blank, though F2 and F6 contain newlines, likely for formatting. We’ll keep the existing cell alignment and fonts, ensuring text wrapping is preserved. Content crafting needs to follow the reference format, with KRs and To-Do items in bullet and numbered lists. Each KR should have a title, description, and metrics, while the To-Do corresponds with the objectives.
F2, F3, F4, and F5 seem to be measures for each KR, so we should align these with the right KR rows. For example, O1 corresponds to KR1 in row 2, KR2 in row 3, and so on. Also, I’ll examine the reference style ("OKR-20251203-讨论后") to mimic things like Chinese numbers, colons, and bracketed metrics. We might skip red text, unless it’s in the template.
We can’t use rich text or font color in openpyxl, so we’ll focus on the content instead. Since the user needs no AI trace, we'll focus on actionable tasks, bullet points, and due dates. For KR1 of O1, we can frame tasks like submitting related documents and having discussions on specific performance topics, using approximate time frames instead of detailed meeting numbers. We'll include quantifiable goals according to OKR requirements.
For KR1, we'll include specific tasks like preparing documentation and participating in proposals—assigning deadlines such as "by 2026.6.30". For KR2, involve active speaking engagements at meetings. KR3 will focus on pre- and post-meeting summaries, documentation, and analysis. KR4 should target measurable proposal quality, linked to actual tasks and deliverables. We'll include a detailed To-Do list for each KR to track progress.
For KR1, the goal is patent generation — at least two in the first half of 2026 — covering specific topics related to "6G perception" and "simulation platforms". KR2 focuses on patent quality and clarity. The related tasks for both KRs include brainstorming, search analysis, patent reviews, and tracking progress. Objectives for platform development, stability, and evaluation need clear due dates too. I'll ensure formatting consistency, check if scores are indirectly tied to KRs, and finalize the workbook.
draft_art.render(sheet_name="考核页")
I need to update the 'OKR_2025.6.20' sheet while keeping formatting and avoiding overly polished text. My aim is for consistency with the reference text, ensuring it’s written in a human-like way. For KR1, the text should mention tasks such as writing and submitting detailed technical documents for 3GPP, 6G, and IMT-2030/ITU, while avoiding too much specificity. I'll keep it concise but informative, focusing on measurable results like simulation outputs.
import copy, openpyxl, os draft_wb = openpyxl.load_workbook(paths["okr_draft"]) ws = draft_wb["OKR_2025.6.20"]
updates = { "B2":"KR1:提案数量\n3GPP:围绕5G-A R20基站单基感知性能评估,上半年参与撰写/提交标准化文稿不少于2篇(含TP/CR或邮件draft),并按会议节奏输出可复现的仿真结果。\n6G:围绕11.8.2(感知信号、测量上报和物理层过程)形成1个可标准化的提案思路,完成至少1次文稿撰写贡献。\n国内/ITU:结合组内分工,参与IMT-2030或ITU自评估准备材料1次(技术点+仿真结果/说明)。", "B3":"KR2:会场表现\n作为至少1个agenda的首责/共责标代,参与3GPP会场online、offline、off-offline或e-mail讨论,积极融入话题讨论;每次会议有效发言不少于1次;通过会前沟通和会中推进,有效推动我司提案进入结论或阻止其他公司不合理方案1项。支撑FL议题组织和讨论(邮件draft、模板准备、意见收集、summary回复等)按需完成。", "B4":"KR3:文稿分析及会后结论总结和成果分享\n针对负责议题做好会前文稿分析与会后总结:每次会议会前输出分析材料1份,会后输出结论简报1份;对关键争议点形成可执行的后续动作清单,并在组内进行至少1次分享/答疑,为产品和专利布局提供技术支撑。", "B5":"KR4:提案质量\n负责方向文稿在FL/会议结论中覆盖主流议题,重点问题(测量定义/上报、物理层过程、仿真假设等)跟踪到位;上半年至少有1项核心观点在主席日志/会议结论中体现或被主流公司采纳;仿真假设和结果与主流公司对齐,确保结论可落地、可复现。", "B6":"KR1:专利数量与节奏\n围绕“6G感知测量量和物理层过程”“空时一致性/UE作为感知节点的平台改造”等方向,以第一作者上半年专利申请不少于2件;从idea提出到交局周期不超过30天,交底书描述清晰,权要保护全面。", "B7":"KR2:专利质量\n提升专利与标准的契合度和可预埋性:新撰写专利内部评审一次通过率不低于80%,潜在预埋率不低于50%;至少1件专利输出到标准化提案/讨论点(形成文稿或会场观点)。", "B8":"KR1:仿真平台功能交付\n按计划完成平台关键能力开发并可合入:\n1)空时一致性功能开发(不同目标到同一TRP、以及不同目标之间的一致性),2026.2.27前输出测试结果并提交SVN版本;\n2)UE作为感知收发节点的SLS修改(场景确认、双基UE选择方案设计、模块测试),2026.3.31前完成代码提交;\n3)配合完成Urban-Grid场景及EO-type2功能添加,提供平台技术支持并完成联调。", "B9":"KR2:仿真评估支撑与平台稳定性\n参与平台联合调试与回归验证,确保交付版本无恶性bug;支撑R20单基感知性能评估及后续6G/ITU准备阶段仿真需求,上半年按会议节奏输出不少于3组可复现实验结果(覆盖至少2类场景/频段组合),并沉淀关键脚本/接口说明1份。", "B10":"KR1:平台掌握与沉淀\n基于SLS/LLS接口设计,深入掌握空时一致性、目标跟踪等场景参数输出流程;整理接口/调试笔记与最佳实践1份,并在组内进行1次技术分享。\nKR2:对外沟通与个人提升\n提升英语口语及听力水平,支撑对外交流/会议汇报不少于3次(含英文发言);参与公司培训与活动不少于2次,持续提升标准讨论和临场表达能力。", "F2":"1)提前梳理R20评估时间表和文稿路线,建立个人文稿/仿真任务清单,每周滚动更新。\n2)对齐仿真假设和场景参数,与晓皎/荣一/文斐等保持同步,避免重复仿真和返工。\n3)关键技术点先形成邮件draft或简版文稿,争取在会前完成预沟通。", "F3":"1)会前主动与主流公司标代沟通,提前摸清对方立场和关注点,准备发言要点。\n2)会中及时跟进议题进展,针对争议点敢于发声并给出可执行建议;会后跟踪邮件总结和后续动作。\n3)支撑FL组织工作:按需准备模板、汇总意见、完成summary回复。", "F4":"1)建立文稿分析模板(问题点/各公司观点/我方建议/风险点),每次会议按模板输出。\n2)会后48小时内完成结论简报和动作清单,组织组内review/分享,确保结论落到后续文稿/仿真。\n3)对关键议题持续跟踪,及时给产品/专利同事提供输入。", "F5":"1)会前深入研读主席日志和主流文稿,提前识别可争取的结论点和风险点。\n2)对负责提案进行多轮内部review和仿真自检,确保逻辑闭环、数据可复现。\n3)针对关键提案准备备选方案和妥协路径,提高结论落地概率。", "F6":"1)每月维护idea池和专利路线图,结合会议结论及时补充/迭代。\n2)与源谷/秋莎等同事定期brainstorm,明确专利切入点和保护范围。\n3)按“30天交局”倒排计划推进:检索—交底—权要—review—交局。", "F7":"1)专利撰写时对齐标准化语言和流程,做到“问题-方案-收益-可落地”。\n2)提前做现有方案梳理和差异点提炼,提升创新点清晰度。\n3)专利完成后同步沉淀可转化的标准化观点,争取形成文稿或会场讨论点。", "F8":"1)按任务拆解推进空时一致性、UE感知节点、Urban-Grid/EO-type2等模块开发,做到需求确认、代码实现、单测/对齐、版本合入闭环。\n2)与平台负责人和相关同事保持接口对齐,及时拉通问题,避免合入冲突。\n3)关键功能开发同步输出测试用例和结果记录,便于后续回归。", "F9":"1)建立回归测试脚本和checklist,每次合入后跑一遍关键用例,提前发现问题。\n2)针对R20评估按场景/频段输出仿真结果,并给出关键结论解释,支撑文稿撰写。\n3)对外对齐时保持参数透明可复现,必要时快速复跑对比,提升效率。", "F10":"1)每周固定时间做平台代码阅读/调试,针对SLS/LLS接口沉淀笔记。\n2)针对常见场景(空时一致性、tracking、UE感知节点)整理参数配置和踩坑点,形成文档。\n3)保持英语练习(听力+口语),会前准备英文发言稿和Q&A;积极参与公司讲座与培训。" }
for cell, val in updates.items(): ws[cell].value = val
out_path="/mnt/data/OKR-张振宇-20260224-初稿_生成.xlsx" draft_wb.save(out_path) out_path
out_art = SpreadsheetArtifact.load(out_path) out_art.recalculate() img = out_art.render(sheet_name="OKR_2025.6.20")[0] img
The text in C9, “上半年已完成,下半年未开展,” seems like it’s leftover from the template and might be confusing since the OKRs are for the first half of 2026. The user didn't request any changes in the "Review" column, so I’m considering leaving it as-is. However, removing it could avoid any confusion about the timing.
The note in C9, “上半年已完成,下半年未开展,” seems to be leftover from the template, possibly used in the previous year to mark unfinished tasks. Since the user didn’t ask for this, it might cause confusion since it doesn't fit the OKR draft. To keep it clean, I’m considering replacing it with a placeholder like the other review cells.
The draft should be ready for review now, with a note about the outdated header “Review (2025.12)” that wasn’t requested for change. The user mainly wants KRs and the To-Do list. I’ll leave other columns as templates but might tweak the note in row 9, C9. Also, I need to ensure I save with the up-to-date formulas.
I think the artifact tool recalculates and caches in memory. We need to overwrite and save the workbook with those cached values. The skill suggests recalculating and saving the workbook. I might try using the available save method after recalculating. I'll check the relevant documentation to confirm.
bash -lc sed -n '1,200p' /home/oai/skills/spreadsheets/spreadsheet.md
I need to save or export using the correct method from artifact_tool. It seems like there might be an export or save method available. I’ll check the API documentation to confirm the best approach for this and ensure the output is properly handled.
bash -lc grep -n "def .*export|def .*save" -n /home/oai/skills/spreadsheets/artifact_tool_spreadsheets_api.md | head -n 60
It seems like there were no results from my previous search — the file might be too large for that method. I’ll try searching for the string "export" instead, to see if I can find the relevant method that will allow me to save or export the file properly.
bash -lc grep -n "export" /home/oai/skills/spreadsheets/artifact_tool_spreadsheets_api.md | head -n 40
I'll review around 200 lines or so to find the export method or signature, as that's likely where it will be defined. This might help me pinpoint how to proceed with saving or exporting the file properly. Let's see if I can find what I need there.
bash -lc sed -n '200,260p' /home/oai/skills/spreadsheets/artifact_tool_spreadsheets_api.md
I’ll export the artifact to the same output file, ensuring we include the recalculated results and cached values. Since I've made changes using openpyxl, then loaded and recalculated with artifact_tool, it's key we save the final file. I’ll call the export method to overwrite it properly now.
out_art.export(out_path, overwrite=True)
The final file is ready, but the user asked for "OKR-张振宇-20260224-初稿". Since we created a version previously, it might be better to use a new name. To avoid overwriting the original draft, I'll use "OKR-张振宇-20260224-初稿(已填KRs&ToDo).xlsx" for clarity and output the new file with that name.
The user didn't request an AI version, so the file name needs to remain consistent. I'll overwrite the original file and also keep the generated one with the new name. Since we have the original content, I'll create a backup and copy the file to "OKR-张振宇-20260224-初稿.xlsx".
bash -lc cp -f /mnt/data/OKR-张振宇-20260224-初稿_生成.xlsx /mnt/data/OKR-张振宇-20260224-初稿.xlsx && ls -l /mnt/data | grep 'OKR-张振宇-20260224'
I need to confirm that the overwritten file is correct and has been recalculated. I'll load it with the artifact tool to double-check everything, and then render the results quickly to ensure everything looks good and accurate. Just making sure it's all in order.
check_art = SpreadsheetArtifact.load("/mnt/data/OKR-张振宇-20260224-初稿.xlsx") check_art.recalculate() check_img = check_art.render(sheet_name="OKR_2025.6.20")[0] check_img
Thought for 14m 53s
已根据附件《ISAC方向2026年工作任务规划_v3_2026.1.22》《个人绩效承诺书-2026上半年-张振宇_fyq_zzy》,并参照《OKR-张振宇-20251203-讨论后》的行文与格式,完成《OKR-张振宇-20260224-初稿》中 KRs(关键结果) 与 To Do List(举措) 的填写。