联网查询，Claude 4.6 opus和sonnet版本，哪个更好

User inquiry

User is curious about the Claude 4.6 opus and sonnet versions, comparing them for a specific use case, and needs recent web-run search results.

Consulting specialized sources

I'm piecing together details from official sources to compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.6, examining context window, pricing, and performance for a thorough comparison.

Creating the comparison

I’m working through a comparison of Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6, focusing on positioning, context, output tokens, and pricing to aid the user's decision.

Navigating model details

I’m heading to the models overview page from the API docs, considering linking or clicking ID 7 for the latest updates.

Weighing model benefits

Interestingly enough, Opus stands out with its reliability and prominent knowledge cutoff. Sonnet, though formidable, shows a slight edge with fresher training data.

Analyzing pricing

I’m comparing Opus and Sonnet 4.6’s pricing, Sonnet's key improvements, and their features to determine the best choice for the user.

Weighing knowledge reliability

I’m examining Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.6's knowledge cutoffs, considering recent updates and potential variations. This helps make an informed decision on their reliability.

Weighing positioning

I'm thinking through Opus' edge in context retrieval and comparing it with Sonnet 4.5, pondering over third-party benchmarks and official scores to validate claims.

Evaluating options

Weighing performance against Opus and Sonnet costs. Considering speed, accuracy, and scalability, especially for extensive reports and code generation tasks.

Mapping the choices

Piecing together a comparison table with citations on pricing, output, and training cutoffs to showcase Opus and Sonnet's distinct advantages and applications.

Evaluating safety protocols

OK, let me see. I’m gathering baseline safety data for Sonnet and Opus using various PDFs and avoiding excessive citations. Considering Opus 4.6's edge in this area.

Mapping the models

The Claude API features Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.6, focusing on cognitive capacities, adaptive and long-context reasoning, safety, and cutting-edge performance benchmarks.

Evaluating options

I’m considering Opus 4.6 for complex reasoning and coding, while Sonnet 4.6 suits cost-efficiency and speed. Safety and new features are also crucial criteria.

Comparison strategies

Listing key differences: pricing, latency, context, output, knowledge cutoffs. Highlighting Opus 4.6's complex task abilities and Sonnet 4.6's efficiency.

Evaluating cost difference

OK, let me see. Opus 4.6 is roughly 1.67 times pricier than Sonnet 4.6. Sonnet offers 40% cheaper input and output tokens, suggesting a more budget-friendly choice.

Breaking down options

Presenting final guidance on Claude Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6, including quick tables, key metrics, and a navigation list for further exploration.

Crafting the message

I’m prioritizing accuracy, emphasizing Sonnet 4.6 as the go-to for most tasks, and highlighting Opus 4.6's capabilities for complex or high-stakes requirements.

Gathering sources

I'm curating citations for pricing, context, latency, and preferences, focusing on authoritative sources and aligning with guidelines for a balanced and credible completion.

Reasoned for 11m 49s