统摄/总结/承接类的短语

बनाया गया: 13 सितंबर 2025

का उपयोग करके उत्तर दिया गया GPT-5 Pro द्वारा Chat01

प्रश्न

“Discussion0909

Using the MIMIC-IV database, we evaluated associations between ICU-measured HGI and 30-, 90-, 180-, and 365-day all-cause mortality in patients with AF.

HGI showed a reverse J shaped association with all-cause mortality, and this pattern persisted after adjustment for demographics, vital signs, laboratory values, comorbidities, clinical scores, and medications.

Patients with low HGI had higher in-hospital mortality and longer ICU stays.

Below the inflection point, risk increased sharply as HGI decreased;above it, the curve plateaued, and further increases in HGI were associated with minimal additional risk.

These findings underscore the potential clinical relevance of HGI for risk evaluation and stratification and for informing management in ICU patients with atrial fibrillation.

Evidence from large cohorts and meta-analyses indicates that, even after accounting for conventional risk factors, diabetes confers an approximately 30–40% higher risk of incident atrial fibrillation.

Critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation often have complex clinical profiles and face elevated risks of adverse outcomes due to multiple interacting insults .

Admission blood glucose alone cannot capture chronic glycemic exposure because it does not reflect long-term fluctuations.

HbA1c is strongly correlated with mean glucose; however, mean glucose accounts for approximately 60–80% of the variance in HbA1c, leaving roughly 20–40% unexplained by glycemia—a residual that may have prognostic relevance for adverse outcomes .

HGI quantifies this residual component and is calculated as observed HbA1c minus glucose-predicted HbA1c.HGI provides a phenotypic index of glycation propensity and glycemic variability, especially relevant among ICU patients with AF.

The variation captured by HGI likely reflects factors beyond ambient glucose—including erythrocyte redox status, intrinsic glycation activity, genetic susceptibility of red cells, and hemoglobin oxygenation—which may underlie interindividual differences in the HbA1c–fasting glucose relationship.

Accumulating evidence indicates that higher HGI is associated with greater prevalence and incidence of microvascular complications—such as diabetic retinopathy and chronic kidney disease—independent of conventional glycemic measures.

In cardiovascular cohorts, elevated HGI is associated with increased risk of atherosclerotic events and may delineate subgroups that experience differential benefit or harm from intensive glucose-lowering strategies.

Beyond diabetes, higher HGI is associated with insulin resistance, carotid atherosclerosis, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in general-population and nondiabetic cohorts, suggesting that HGI captures broader metabolic risk.
Across acute-care settings—including stroke, heart failure, and critical illness—both high and low HGI have been associated with mortality or poor functional recovery, supporting a nonlinear relationship between glycation phenotype and prognosis.

In AF, HGI can be viewed as a composite phenotypic index that integrates glycation propensity and glycemic variability and is influenced by red cell turnover .

A coherent mechanistic framework implicates the advanced glycation end products (AGE)–receptor for AGE (RAGE) axis, together with RAAS activation and autonomic–metabolic stress, in driving oxidative injury and profibrotic TGF-β/Smad signaling.Epigenetically mediated metabolic memory sustains hyperglycemia induced signaling beyond episodes of transient hyperglycemia.

AGE-mediated collagen cross-linking stiffens the extracellular matrix and confers resistance to proteolysis, thereby limiting reverse remodeling.

In parallel, endothelial dysfunction and microvascular injury—exacerbated by recurrent stress hyperglycemia—promote nitric oxide depletion, a prothrombotic shift, and conduction heterogeneity [31,32].

Insulin resistance and inflamed epicardial adipose tissue add lipotoxic and mitochondrial stress, modulating CaMKII activity, ion-channel expression, and connexins.

Together, structural fibrosis (conduction slowing and spatial dispersion) and ionic remodeling (effective refractory period shortening and afterdepolarizations) supply both substrate and triggers for AF [33].

These processes converge into positive feedback loops linking glycemic dynamics, oxidative–fibrotic remodeling, and electrophysiologic instability, with the strength of evidence varying across steps.

Against this backdrop, between-study inconsistencies in the HGI likely arise from three domains: (1) non-glycemic determinants of HbA1c; (2) how predicted HbA1c and HGI are derived and modeled; and (3) population characteristics and treatment strategies [18].

Computational choices also matter: predicted HbA1c has been generated from heterogeneous regressions (e.g., fasting plasma glucose vs. mean glucose monitoring; cohort-specific vs. externally calibrated equations), and HGI has been analyzed as a continuous variable, by quantiles, or by dichotomization—decisions that can alter effect sizes, statistical significance, and even the direction of associations .

Notably, HGI derived from a single fasting glucose captures a different facet of glycemia than CGM-based estimates, a distinction has been highlighted in the DEVOTE secondary analysis.

In addition, differences in populations and glycemic strategies also shape HGI–outcome associations: in the ACCORD trial (intensive target HbA1c < 6.0%), intensive pharmacotherapy was associated with higher all-cause mortality and the trial was terminated early; by contrast, the ADVANCE trial (gliclazide modified-release regimen; target ≤ 6.5%) showed mainly microvascular benefits without excess mortality. Together with an ACCORD secondary analysis suggesting that harms clustered in high-HGI subgroups under intensive therapy, these contrasts illustrate how population and treatment strategy can shape observed risk patterns [34–36].

Taken together, heterogeneity in biology, analytics, and population/treatment strategies plausibly explains the divergent findings.

Consistent with this, multiple observational cohorts in critical-care and cardiovascular settings show a reverse-J association between HGI and outcomes, with higher mortality or complications at the low-HGI end (ICU heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, mixed ICU cohorts). Low HGI may index non-glycemic depression of HbA1c or overtreatment-related discordance, both of which can track heightened vulnerability despite apparently favorable HbA1c [37].

Across 30, 90, 180, and 365 days, adjusted spline curves consistently indicated a reverse J shaped association, with a nadir near HGI ≈ 0 and an inflection around −0.6().

Beyond the inflection, slopes were shallow and confidence bands wide, providing limited evidence for a monotonic increase.

Tests for the overall association and for nonlinearity were significant at the 30 and 365 day horizons;results at other time points were directionally consistent. (Report exact P values if available.)

Threshold models were concordant: below the inflection, each 1 unit increase in HGI (toward 0) was associated with a lower hazard, whereas above the inflection marginal effects were near null (95% CIs crossed 1.0).

Taken together, excess mortality clustered at the low HGI tail, with minimal incremental risk beyond the identified inflection.

Exploratory subgroup analyses—interpreted with multiplicity in mind—suggested effect modification consistent with biological heterogeneity [36].

Patients without chronic kidney disease or prior myocardial infarction displayed steeper risk gradients at higher HGI, whereas those with CKD or previous MI showed attenuated or reversed, likely because competing pathways dominate their prognosis[38,39].

The steeper high-HGI gradients in the strata without CKD or MI suggest that modifiable glycemic–vascular mechanisms are unmasked when irreversible structural disease is absent [40].

In established CKD, assay interference and uremic, inflammatory, and arrhythmic risks may attenuate the mortality association of HGI, rendering its prognostic signal less apparent[38].

After prior MI, scar burden, neurohormonal activation, and guideline-directed therapies often dominate outcomes, further attenuating HGI’s relative signal[39].

By contrast, patients without these fixed injuries may display greater endothelial plasticity and thrombo-inflammatory responsiveness to glycation stress[40].

Other prespecified subgroup analyses (BMI, diabetes, gender, and age) did not reveal statistically significant interactions with HGI and are not emphasized further .

At very low HGI, depression of HbA1c that is independent of ambient glycemia can accompany high physiologic stress .

Shortened erythrocyte lifespan during systemic inflammation, iron-restricted erythropoiesis with hepcidin upregulation and reticulocytosis, and uremic carbamylation can create a negative glycation gap, yielding deceptively low HbA1c despite substantial metabolic strain.

This hematologic/immunometabolic milieu—often co occurring with malnutrition–inflammation–catabolism—promotes mitochondrial dysfunction, dysregulated coagulation and vasoplegia, and susceptibility to secondary infection, phenomena poorly captured by glucose indices alone.

The net effect is a spuriously low HbA1c amid high stress, consistent with the disproportionate short-term mortality observed at the low-HGI tail.

When renal and myocardial reserve are preserved, chronically higher HGI plausibly reflects sustained glycation burden and glycemic volatility[45].

Activation of the AGE–RAGE axis augments NADPH oxidase–dependent oxidative stress and depletes nitric oxide bioavailability; glycocalyx injury and endothelial dysfunction tilt toward a prothrombotic, hypofibrinolytic state (elevated PAI-1, denser fibrin networks).

Superimposed sympathetic activation and oscillating glucose generate recurrent oxidative bursts that foster thrombo-inflammation and microvascular injury, while ionic remodeling (e.g., CaMKII signaling, ion-channel and connexin changes) may increase conduction heterogeneity relevant to AF.

This framework explains the modest upward slopes at higher HGI overall and the steeper gradients in subgroups where organ reserve is intact.

Collectively, the data suggest a reserve dependent model: low HGI often reflects illness and assay related depression of HbA1c and acute vulnerability, whereas high HGI indexes glycation mediated vascular risk chiefly when renal and myocardial reserves are intact.

We present this reserve-dependent framework as hypothesis-generating rather than definitive, inviting validation through prospective replications, quasi-experimental designs, and mechanistic interrogation.

Clinically, these data support individualized interpretation of HGI: identify and treat reversible causes of spuriously low HGI in the overall population, while considering dysglycemic and vascular pathways in subgroups where higher HGI retains prognostic salience.

Such heterogeneity motivates targeted evaluation rather than uniform intensification of glucose-lowering therapy.

Mechanistically anchored phenotyping—combining HGI with inflammation indices, renal function, and measures of glycemic variability—may help identify patients most likely to benefit from vascular-protective strategies.

Such approaches should be accompanied by vigilance for spuriously low HbA1c, ensuring that low HGI triggers investigation for anemia, hemolysis, and assay interference. Accordingly, our findings should be interpreted as hypothesis generating and require confirmation in independent, multicenter cohorts with standardized assessment of HbA1c modifiers.
”把所有类似于“Taken together”、“ Accordingly,”等统摄短语找出来,你觉得当前统摄短语的频率高吗?你觉得可以怎么改?不需要提供完整的修改后文章,把你觉得需要改的原句和改后的例句方案提供给我。

विचार

Establishing associations

Evaluating link between HGI and cardiovascular cohorts. Tailoring insights to specific patient groups.

Synthesizing evidence

I’m gathering data from critical-care and cardiovascular cohorts, aligning findings with biological heterogeneity. It’s interesting to see how population and treatment strategies shape observed risk patterns.

Categorizing transition phrases

I'm classifying umbrella/relevant phrases into categories like Summative, Causal/Inference, Contrast, Additive, Framing/Context, and Domain-shift, then listing and assessing their frequency in the text.

Refining transitions

I’m targeting repetitive phrases like "Taken together," proposing concise and varied replacements. Emphasizing structural clarity and balanced language for improved coherence.

Identifying umbrella phrases

I’m narrowing down a list of umbrella/meta-discursive phrases to include "Taken together," "Accordingly," "Consistent with this," "Collectively," "Clinically," "By contrast," "In parallel," "In addition," "Notably," "Together," "Against this backdrop," "Beyond the inflection," "Beyond diabetes," and "Across acute-care settings—".

Refining a list

I’m refining a list of umbrella markers, including phrases like "Taken together," "Accordingly," and "Consistent with this," to ensure comprehensive coverage of term variations and accurate counting.

Crafting a task

I'm working through coding a way to pinpoint sentences with markers by splitting text into sentences, iterating through lines, and storing relevant context.

Cross-referencing markers

I’m curious about "Taken together," and how it aligns with the rest of the data. Checking for any extraneous segments or accidental truncations.

Checking line handling

I’m thinking about whether the initial "Taken together" line has empty spaces affecting the iteration. The presence of mid-sentence newlines might also be a factor.

Gathering statistics

OK, let me see. I’m pulling together counts for specific markers in the data. This involves checking occurrences to better understand their distribution.

Tracking frequency

I’m examining the frequency of summative phrases in the text to determine their occurrence and suggest when they should be used or avoided.

Refining transitions

I’m mapping out suggestions to streamline transitions and rhetorical phrases in the text, aiming for clarity and conciseness. This involves removing redundancy and replacing complex phrases with more direct alternatives.

Reconstructing full sentences
Hmm, I’m thinking about showing full sentences instead of truncated ones to enhance clarity and provide complete information.

Reconstructing data

I’m working on reconstructing the original sentences from raw text markers, ensuring each sentence is fully displayed.

Understanding HGI implications

I'm examining how high glycation index (HGI) is linked to various health risks, including insulin resistance, mortality in acute-care settings, and complications like endothelial dysfunction and microvascular injury.

Crafting patient profiles

I’m mapping out detailed patient profiles based on glycation index, highlighting individual risk factors and treatment needs to guide precision in therapy.

Refining transitions

I'm gathering and assessing transition phrases, like "Taken together" and "By contrast," to streamline the writing while maintaining clarity and relevance across different sections.

Refining transition phrases

I'm mapping out alternatives to transition phrases like "Taken together" and "Consistently." Options include removing signposts, making phrases more specific, and ensuring clarity in each section.

Refining transitions

I'm honing transition phrases to streamline clarity. This involves removing signposts, making phrases more specific, and ensuring each section is clearly presented.

Reasoned for 6m 0s

उत्तर

下面先把你文中统摄/总结/承接类的短语(类似 Taken together, Accordingly 这类起到“收束、总括、转场、对照”作用的元话语)逐一找出来,然后给出频率评估与总体建议,最后提供逐句的可替换改写例句(保留原句+两个改写选项)。


一、文中出现的统摄/总结/承接类短语(按行文先后)

我只列出包含该短语的整句,便于定位。

  1. These findings underscore the potential clinical relevance of HGI for risk evaluation and stratification and for informing management in ICU patients with atrial fibrillation.

  2. In parallel, endothelial dysfunction and microvascular injury—exacerbated by recurrent stress hyperglycemia—promote nitric oxide depletion, a prothrombotic shift, and conduction heterogeneity [31,32].

  3. Together, structural fibrosis (conduction slowing and spatial dispersion) and ionic remodeling (effective refractory period shortening and afterdepolarizations) supply both substrate and triggers for AF [33].

  4. These processes converge into positive feedback loops linking glycemic dynamics, oxidative–fibrotic remodeling, and electrophysiologic instability, with the strength of evidence varying across steps.

  5. Against this backdrop, between-study inconsistencies in the HGI likely arise from three domains: (1) non-glycemic determinants of HbA1c; (2) how predicted HbA1c and HGI are derived and modeled; and (3) population characteristics and treatment strategies [18].

  6. Computational choices also matter: predicted HbA1c has been generated from heterogeneous regressions … and HGI has been analyzed as a continuous variable, by quantiles, or by dichotomization—decisions that can alter effect sizes…

  7. Notably, HGI derived from a single fasting glucose captures a different facet of glycemia than CGM-based estimates…

  8. In addition, differences in populations and glycemic strategies also shape HGI–outcome associations: … Together with an ACCORD secondary analysis…

  9. Taken together, heterogeneity in biology, analytics, and population/treatment strategies plausibly explains the divergent findings.

  10. Consistent with this, multiple observational cohorts in critical-care and cardiovascular settings show a reverse-J association between HGI and outcomes…

  11. Beyond the inflection, slopes were shallow and confidence bands wide, providing limited evidence for a monotonic increase.

  12. Taken together, excess mortality clustered at the low HGI tail, with minimal incremental risk beyond the identified inflection.

  13. By contrast, patients without these fixed injuries may display greater endothelial plasticity and thrombo-inflammatory responsiveness to glycation stress [40].

  14. The net effect is a spuriously low HbA1c amid high stress, consistent with the disproportionate short-term mortality observed at the low-HGI tail.

  15. This framework explains the modest upward slopes at higher HGI overall and the steeper gradients in subgroups where organ reserve is intact.

  16. Collectively, the data suggest a reserve‑dependent model: low HGI often reflects illness and assay‑related depression of HbA1c and acute vulnerability, whereas high HGI indexes glycation‑mediated vascular risk chiefly when renal and myocardial reserves are intact.

  17. Clinically, these data support individualized interpretation of HGI: identify and treat reversible causes of spuriously low HGI…

  18. Accordingly, our findings should be interpreted as hypothesis‑generating and require confirmation in independent, multicenter cohorts…


二、频率评估

  • 全文这类统摄/承接短语约有 18 处,集中出现在“结果解释—机制框架—异质性—临床含义”几段中,其中 “Taken together” 出现 2 次,“Together/Collectively/Accordingly/Consistent with this/By contrast/Against this backdrop/In addition/Notably/Clinically”等也多次出现。
  • 主观阅读感受:频率偏高,尤其是连续段落中每隔 1–3 句就有一个“收束/转场”提示词,容易形成“口头禅”式的重复,削弱论证的自推进感。
  • 建议做法:将这类短语压缩到每个主题段落的关键位置(段末/大转折处 1 次);其余处用更具体的逻辑连接或直接让主语和动词承担逻辑(比如用因果、让步、对照从句或更强的动词)。

三、总体改写策略(可组合使用)

  1. 能省则省:删除无信息量的“口头开场白”(如 Taken together, Accordingly, In addition),让命题直接起句。
  2. 合并相邻句:把“总括句+解释句”合并为一句,避免“句首副词+逗号”的模板化。
  3. 改成更具体的逻辑:把泛化统摄词换成“因果/条件/让步/对比/并列”的从句或短语。
  4. 多样化而不堆砌:保留少数必要的指示词,但避免 Together / Taken together / Collectively 在短距内重复。
  5. 标题化/图注化:对特别宏观的收束语(如“本框架解释了……”)可移至小节标题或图示说明,正文不再反复提示。

四、逐句改写建议(原句 + 两种改写思路)

A 版:直接去掉统摄短语;B 版:保留更具体逻辑或换用更精炼的承接。

  1. These findings underscore the potential clinical relevance of HGI…
  • A:HGI is clinically relevant for risk evaluation and stratification in ICU patients with atrial fibrillation.
  • B:Given these results, HGI appears clinically useful for risk evaluation and stratification in ICU patients with atrial fibrillation.
  1. In parallel, endothelial dysfunction and microvascular injury…
  • A:Endothelial dysfunction and microvascular injury—exacerbated by recurrent stress hyperglycemia—promote nitric oxide depletion…
  • B:In tandem with collagen cross‑linking, endothelial dysfunction and microvascular injury promote nitric oxide depletion…
  1. Together, structural fibrosis … and ionic remodeling … supply both substrate and triggers for AF.
  • A:Structural fibrosis and ionic remodeling supply both substrate and triggers for AF.
  • B:Acting jointly, structural fibrosis and ionic remodeling supply both substrate and triggers for AF.
  1. These processes converge into positive feedback loops linking…
  • A:These processes form positive feedback loops linking glycemic dynamics, oxidative–fibrotic remodeling, and electrophysiologic instability.
  • B:Consequently, positive feedback loops link glycemic dynamics with oxidative–fibrotic remodeling and electrophysiologic instability.
  1. Against this backdrop, between‑study inconsistencies in the HGI likely arise from three domains…
  • A:Between‑study inconsistencies in HGI likely arise from three domains…
  • B:In this context, three domains likely underlie between‑study inconsistencies in HGI…
  1. Computational choices also matter: predicted HbA1c has been…
  • A:Computational choices shape HGI estimates: predicted HbA1c has been…
  • B:Methodological choices—how predicted HbA1c is modeled and how HGI is analyzed—can alter effect sizes and even the direction of associations.
  1. Notably, HGI derived from a single fasting glucose captures…
  • A:HGI derived from a single fasting glucose captures a different facet of glycemia than CGM‑based estimates.
  • B:Importantly, single‑FPG–derived HGI captures a different facet of glycemia than CGM‑based estimates.
  1. In addition, differences in populations and glycemic strategies also shape… (Together with …)
  • A:Differences in populations and glycemic strategies also shape HGI–outcome associations; along with the ACCORD secondary analysis, these contrasts illustrate how strategy and population influence risk patterns.
  • B:Beyond methodology, population and glycemic strategy differences—together with ACCORD secondary analyses—shape observed risk patterns.
  1. Taken together, heterogeneity in biology, analytics, and population/treatment strategies plausibly explains the divergent findings.
  • A:Heterogeneity in biology, analytics, and population/treatment strategies plausibly explains the divergent findings.
  • B:On balance, divergent findings are plausibly explained by heterogeneity across biology, analytics, and treatment strategies.
  1. Consistent with this, multiple observational cohorts… show a reverse‑J association…
  • A:Multiple observational cohorts in critical‑care and cardiovascular settings show a reverse‑J association…
  • B:Consistent with this pattern, observational cohorts in critical‑care and cardiovascular settings show a reverse‑J association…
  1. Beyond the inflection, slopes were shallow and confidence bands wide…
  • A:Above the inflection, slopes were shallow and confidence bands wide…
  • B:Past the inflection point, slopes remained shallow and confidence bands widened…
  1. Taken together, excess mortality clustered at the low HGI tail…
  • A:Excess mortality clustered at the low‑HGI tail, with minimal incremental risk beyond the identified inflection.
  • B:Overall, mortality concentrated at the low‑HGI tail, and risk increased little beyond the inflection.
  1. By contrast, patients without these fixed injuries may display…
  • A:Patients without these fixed injuries may display greater endothelial plasticity and thrombo‑inflammatory responsiveness to glycation stress [40].
  • B:Conversely, in patients without these fixed injuries, endothelial plasticity and thrombo‑inflammatory responsiveness may be greater [40].
  1. The net effect is a spuriously low HbA1c amid high stress…
  • A:This yields a spuriously low HbA1c amid high stress, consistent with the disproportionate short‑term mortality at the low‑HGI tail.
  • B:The result is a spuriously low HbA1c despite high physiologic stress, aligning with the excess short‑term mortality at the low‑HGI tail.
  1. This framework explains the modest upward slopes at higher HGI overall…
  • A:This framework accounts for the modest upward slopes at higher HGI overall and the steeper gradients in subgroups with preserved organ reserve.
  • B:Within this framework, modest overall slopes at higher HGI and steeper subgroup gradients follow naturally from differences in organ reserve.
  1. Collectively, the data suggest a reserve‑dependent model: …
  • A:The data suggest a reserve‑dependent model: low HGI often reflects illness‑ and assay‑related depression of HbA1c and acute vulnerability, whereas high HGI indexes glycation‑mediated vascular risk chiefly when renal and myocardial reserves are intact.
  • B:Taken as a whole, the data support a reserve‑dependent model: …
  1. Clinically, these data support individualized interpretation of HGI: …
  • A:These data support individualized interpretation of HGI: identify and treat reversible causes of spuriously low HGI…
  • B:From a clinical standpoint, the data support individualized interpretation of HGI: …
  1. Accordingly, our findings should be interpreted as hypothesis‑generating…
  • A:Our findings are hypothesis‑generating and require confirmation in independent, multicenter cohorts with standardized assessment of HbA1c modifiers.
  • B:Therefore, these findings should be regarded as hypothesis‑generating and warrant confirmation in independent, multicenter cohorts…

五、简要结论

  • 目前统摄/承接短语使用偏多,且同类词(Together / Taken together / Collectively)在近距离内重复。
  • 采用上面的**“去虚词、强逻辑、合并句”策略,把这些短语保留在关键转折或段末总结即可,其他位置以更具体的因果/对比/条件**来承接,读感会更凝练、更有推进力。
  • 如需,我可以按你的目标期刊风格(如 Circulation, Intensive Care Medicine 等)再做一次全局统一的过渡语精简细节拗句打磨

इस प्रश्नोत्तर को साझा करें