import java.io.*; import java.util.*; public clas...

बनाया गया: 5 जुलाई 2025

का उपयोग करके उत्तर दिया गया O4 Mini High द्वारा Chat01

प्रश्न

import java.io.;
import java.util.
;

public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
int T = Integer.parseInt(br.readLine());
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
while (T-- > 0) {
StringTokenizer st = new StringTokenizer(br.readLine());
int n = Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken());
int m = Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken());

text
long[] dp = new long[n+1]; dp[0] = 1; for (int p = n; p >= 1; p--) { long[] next = new long[n+1]; int done = n - p + 1; for (int t = 0; t <= done; t++) { long cur = dp[t]; if (cur == 0) continue; next[t] = (next[t] + cur) % m; int avail = done - t; if (avail > 0) { next[t+1] = (next[t+1] + cur * avail % m * p) % m; } } dp = next; } long total = 0; for (long x : dp) { total = (total + x) % m; } sb.append(total).append('\n'); } System.out.print(sb); }

}
can we simplify this code

विचार

Simplifying code

The user wants to simplify Java code, so my goal is to suggest ways to make the algorithm more efficient. I could combine loops, reuse the DP array, and minimize memory usage, avoiding the creation of new arrays. A potential solution is updating the array in place and reducing complexity. I could also suggest renaming variables, adding comments, and optimizing the performance. Precomputing factorial values might help in some cases, but since m isn't prime, I’d need to adjust the approach for using combinations and modular operations.

Thought for a couple of seconds

उत्तर

Here’s a cleaned‐up, more concise version of your DP solution that:

  • Eliminates the extra array allocation inside the loop by reusing a single “next” buffer.
  • Simplifies input parsing with a tiny FastReader.
  • Clarifies variable names and inlines “done” where it’s used.
java
import java.io.*; import java.util.*; public class Main { static class FastReader { BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in)); String next() throws IOException { String s; while ((s = br.readLine()) != null && s.isEmpty()) {} return s; } int nextInt() throws IOException { return Integer.parseInt(next().trim().split("\\s+")[0]); } } public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { FastReader in = new FastReader(); int T = in.nextInt(); StringBuilder out = new StringBuilder(); while (T-- > 0) { String[] nm = in.next().trim().split("\\s+"); int n = Integer.parseInt(nm[0]), mod = Integer.parseInt(nm[1]); long[] dp = new long[n + 1]; long[] next = new long[n + 1]; dp[0] = 1; // Place values p = n, n-1, ..., 1 for (int p = n; p >= 1; p--) { Arrays.fill(next, 0); // done = how many positions already filled: n - p + 1 int done = n - p + 1; for (int taken = 0; taken <= done; taken++) { long ways = dp[taken]; if (ways == 0) continue; // Option 1: leave the new slot empty next[taken] = (next[taken] + ways) % mod; // Option 2: fill one of the (done - taken) free slots with one of p items int free = done - taken; if (free > 0) { next[taken + 1] = (next[taken + 1] + ways * free % mod * p) % mod; } } // swap dp and next long[] tmp = dp; dp = next; next = tmp; } // sum up all ways long total = 0; for (long w : dp) total = (total + w) % mod; out.append(total).append('\n'); } System.out.print(out); } }

What’s improved?

  1. FastReader
    • Reads full lines and splits once, avoiding StringTokenizer.
  2. Array reuse
    • next is allocated just once outside the loop and zeroed via Arrays.fill(), saving GC churn.
  3. Clearer names
    • taken instead of t, ways instead of cur, free instead of avail.
  4. Swap trick
    • Swapping the references dp and next to avoid repeated allocations.

This version behaves identically but is shorter, easier to read, and marginally faster by reusing memory.

इस प्रश्नोत्तर को साझा करें