Mapping out the slope
I'm analyzing the function y=∣x∣+1x+1 and focusing on three distinct points that lie on a line with a slope l, where the sum of their x-coordinates is zero.
Breaking down the function
OK, let me see: For x≥0, the function is y=1. For x<0, it simplifies to y=1−xx+1.
Breaking down the function
I’m analyzing y=1−xx+1 using polynomial division, leading to y=−1−x−12 for x<0. This is becoming clearer as I go.
Examining point configurations
I’m thinking through scenarios for three distinct points on a line with slope l, where the sum of their x-coordinates is zero. Points can lie in x>0 or x<0.
Revisiting point constraints
OK, let me think: for points with x>0, the sum of their x-coordinates can't be zero. This forces me to consider points with non-positive x-coordinates.
Mapping out distinct points
I'm curious about two points in x≥0 and one in x<0. The third point is (−(a+b),1+a+b1−(a+b)), ensuring distinctness.
Noticing a contradiction
OK, let's think it through: Because (a,1) and (b,1) have a slope of 0, having the third point also with a y-value of 1 just isn't feasible.
Evaluating collinearity
I’m examining the scenario with two points in x≥0 and one in x<0. It’s interesting to see that maintaining slope consistency requires the third point to have a y-value of 1.
Analyzing slopes
I'm thinking through one point in x≥0 and two in x<0, ensuring distinctness and maintaining distinct slope angles. This involves confirming the slope distance from each to the others.
Piecing together collinear slopes
I'm calculating slopes from (a,1) to (x1,y1) and (x2,y2), aiming for identical slopes to achieve collinearity. This involves algebraic simplification and slope equality.
Mapping out solutions
I’m working through parametric symmetry or setting a=0. I find that a=0 doesn't fit, so I’m focusing on a>0 to pinpoint potential points.
Taking a closer look
When both x1 and x2 are negative, the sum is negative, which can't be zero. Thus, we must have one or two points in x>0.
Establishing the equation
I’m working through slopes to establish relationships among a, x1, and l, then using x1+x2=−a to find x2.
Ensuring slopes align
I’m confirming slopes for (x1,y1) and (x2,y2) match. With x1 between −a and 0, x2=−a−x1 also falls in this range.
Aligning slopes
I’m comparing slopes from (x1,y1) to (x2,y2) with (a,1) using Python. Adjusting a>0 and x1 within (−a,0), I’ll identify overlapping slopes for consistency.
Examining slope trends
I'm thinking through how slopes change with a from 0 to infinity, using a Python numeric approach to find a range of slopes consistent with collinearity.
Ensuring point uniqueness
I'm checking that x1=a and x2=a, since both are negative and a>0. Maintaining x1=x2 only causes an issue when a=0.
Confirming collinearity
I’m focusing on a numeric approach to verify collinearity by comparing slopes with Python, ensuring all points align consistently within the given range.
推理关于斜率取值范围 for 48 seconds