Assessing supermarket loss
The supermarket loses 50 yuan by exchanging a fake 100 yuan bill for a real 50 yuan purchase. Despite receiving the counterfeit bill, the store incurs a 50 yuan loss.
Evaluating net loss
The store's net loss involves 50 yuan of goods and 50 yuan in actual money, totaling 100 yuan. Despite initially giving 50 yuan in goods and 50 yuan in change, the counterfeit detection confirms this.
Breaking down the cost
The store's net loss includes 50 yuan in goods and 50 yuan in real money, totaling 100 yuan. The counterfeit 100 yuan note is irrelevant to the loss calculation.
Assessing the loss
The store's net loss from the transaction involves parting with 50 yuan in goods and 50 yuan in real money, totaling 100 yuan. Despite receiving a worthless 100 yuan note, the net effect remains -100.
Analyzing the net loss
The store's net loss is calculated as parting with 50 yuan in goods and 50 yuan in real money, totaling 100 yuan. The worthless 100 yuan note is excluded from this calculation.
Calculating the loss
The store's loss is determined by the 50 yuan in goods and 50 yuan in real money given to the buyer, totaling 100 yuan. The counterfeit 100 yuan note is not factored in.
Breaking down the loss
OK, let me see. The store's total loss is 100 yuan: 50 in goods and 50 in real money. The counterfeit 100 yuan note is ruled out for accurate calculation.
Evaluating the net result
The store's net loss is assessed as 100 yuan, combining 50 yuan in goods and 50 yuan in real money. The worthless 100 yuan note is disregarded in this analysis.
Confirming the net loss
OK, let me see. The store's net loss is 100 yuan, due to 50 yuan in goods and 50 yuan in real money. The worthless 100 yuan note is disregarded in this calculation.
Confirming the store's loss
OK, let's break it down: the store's net loss is 100 yuan—50 in goods and 50 in real money—excluding the worthless 100 yuan note.
Assessing the ambiguity
The puzzle typically portrays a net loss of 50 yuan, often undervaluing goods and ignoring the actual sale value. The cost price ambiguity complicates the assessment.
Evaluating the net outcome
The store's net loss is actually 100 yuan. Despite the puzzle's typical value of 50 yuan, the store's loss is 50 yuan in goods plus 50 yuan in real money.
Revisiting logic
The typical puzzle logic suggests a 100 yuan loss, combining 50 yuan in goods and 50 yuan in real money. The worthless 100 yuan note is largely irrelevant here.
Considering the twists
OK, let me see. The puzzle might involve the store recovering 50 yuan from the buyer after noticing the fake 100 yuan note since the buyer paid the remaining 50 yuan with real money.
Revisiting the supermarket puzzle
The store's net loss is intriguing: 100 yuan in real cash versus 50 yuan in goods. The fake 50 yuan note, exchanged for 100 yuan, is a non-issue for the store.
Assessing the store's position
I’m curious about the store's net gain of 50 yuan in real money. Considering the potential for the buyer to realize the 50 yuan note is fake and seek a refund is key to understanding potential future losses.
Assessing the scenario
The supermarket's net gain of 50 yuan in real money is being evaluated. The buyer received 50 yuan in fake money as change. Future actions by the buyer could alter this balance.
Evaluating potential consequences
OK, so the store seems to be in the clear with a net gain of 50 yuan in real money after giving 50 yuan in fake money as change. Let's see if there's more to uncover.
Assessing the aftermath
The store initially gained 100 real money from the buyer but had to return 50 real after giving 50 worth of goods and 50 fake money.
Balancing the books
Considering the cash inflows and outflows, the store's net loss is neutral. The puzzle might be a red herring, as no actual loss occurred.
Evaluating the loss
The puzzle suggests the store didn't lose anything since they gave the fake money to the buyer, who instead lost 50 yuan.
Verifying the transaction
The puzzle likely shows that the store didn't lose any money, since they gave the buyer fake money, leading to the buyer losing 50 yuan.
Reevaluating the scenario
OK, let me break this down: if the buyer gave 100 fake money for 50 goods, the store lost 100 worth of goods plus 50 real, netting a 50 yuan loss.
Noticing the buyer's loss
I’m thinking through how giving 50 fake yuan as change saves the store 50 yuan. Despite parting with 50 yuan worth of goods, the net result is no loss.
Thought about超市亏损金额 持续 49 秒
