So I have doing this challenge tell me the answer ...

Creado el: 1 de octubre de 2026

Respondido usando GPT-5.6 Thinking por Chat01

Pregunta

So I have doing this challenge tell me the answer Challenge 34 — 30 Points
Analyze challenge3.exe and determine the hexadecimal value used as the divisor in its final checksum validation on 172.25.65.103.
Answer format: NxNX

Respuesta

I’ll inspect the provided challenge files for challenge3.exe, then trace the final checksum check to extract the divisor and format it as requested.

Pensamiento

Analyzed challenge3.exe to identify the divisor

Pensamiento

Checked private host accessibility

Worked for 17s

Respuesta

I can solve it, but challenge3.exe isn’t attached here, and the private host 172.25.65.103 isn’t reachable from this environment.

Upload challenge3.exe and I’ll inspect the final checksum-validation routine and return just the hexadecimal divisor in the required NxNX format.

Pregunta

C48-V3-CPENT-Style-Practice-Lab.zip
Screenshot 2026-09-30 055344.png

So for the challenge these are all the evidence I have got now check everything and tell me the 48th challenge answer

Pensamiento

Inspected CTF evidence archive and exploit lab application

Worked for 23s

Respuesta

I checked the supplied Challenge 48 lab evidence. In TKT-TKT-004_Emergency_Staging.md, the ticket shows:

  • Region | North Ridge
  • Maria — North Ridge

Challenge 48 answer: North Ridge

Pregunta

CPENT-Evidence-All.zip
Screenshot 2026-09-30 055344.png

So these are all the evidence I got now check every file and tell me what is the answer for the 48th challenge which I have sent you with the image

Pensamiento

Inspected archives and web files to extract Challenge 48 evidence and endpoints

Pensamiento

Reviewing Emergency Staging Procedures

Worked for 1m 13s

Respuesta

I checked the Challenge 48 evidence across the files you sent.

The decisive file is TKT-TKT-004_Emergency_Staging.md, which contains:

Region | North Ridge

and under Personnel:

Maria — North Ridge

So the answer in the required Xxxxx Xxxxx format is:

North Ridge

One important detail: in CPENT-Evidence-All.zip, the Challenge 48 retrieval attempts show HTTP 000 and the saved answer/data files are empty. The explicit North Ridge value comes from the earlier C48-V3-CPENT-Style-Practice-Lab.zip you supplied. If that ZIP is a faithful copy of your target evidence, North Ridge is the answer.

Pregunta

IOT.zip

See these are the totall evidence for the IOT and these are all the challengs now tell me AM i done all correct or if their are any mistakes in it IoT / Firmware Analysis Challenge Questions
Challenge 13 — 20 Points
What is the block size of IOT.bin file in bytes?
Answer format: NNNNN

Challenge 14 — 20 Points
What is the CPU architecture of the IOT2.bin file?
Answer format: Xxxxxxxx

Challenge 15 — 20 Points
Determine the Linux version compatible with the IOT2.bin file.
Answer format: Xxxxx N.N.NN.N

Challenge 16 — 30 Points
Determine the file format of the extracted file 813682 from IOT3.bin.
Answer format: XXX

Challenge 17 — 20 Points
Determine the offset value of the extracted file D8232C within IOT3.bin.
Answer format: NxNNxNNN

Challenge 18 — 20 Points
What is the IP address of the device named DSP-W215 found in the database file of IOT4.bin?
Answer format: NNN.NNN.N.NN

Challenge 19 — 30 Points
What is the version of BusyBox used in IOT4.bin?
Answer format: xN.NN.N

Challenge 20 — 30 Points
What is the GCC version used to compile the file located at offset 464A28 in the IOT5.bin image?
Answer format: N.N.N

Challenge 21 — 20 Points
Analyze the file IOT5.bin in 172.25.120.110 and determine its file system.
Answer format: XXXXN

Challenge 22 — 40 Points
On the machine 172.25.120.100, analyze IOT firmware image FileOne.bin and determine the image size.
Answer format: NNNNNNN

Challenge 23 — 100 Points
What is the starting address of the file system in FileTwo.bin on 172.25.120.100?
Answer format: NxXNNNN

Challenge 24 — 50 Points
On the machine 172.25.120.110, in IOT6.bin, which file contains the root user’s password?
Answer format: xxxxxx

Challenge 25 — 100 Points
On IP address 172.25.120.110, what is the firmware device for the IOT6.bin firmware?
Answer format: XXXXNXXX and these are all the question check the answer format and do it very detaily

Pensamiento

Checking answer consistency

I’m reviewing the final entries and formatting closely. Challenge 16 appears to have a format mismatch: “XXX” conflicts with the two-character answer “XZ.” Challenge 17 also needs verification because “Dx82x32C” may not match the stated pattern cleanly.

Checked answer consistency

Pensamiento

Auditing challenge answers

I’m checking each response against the evidence and required format. Most answers appear correct, but Challenges 16, 17, and 25 need attention: their values or formats don’t align cleanly. The remaining answers look consistent.

Inspected ZIP contents, extracted IoT evidence, and analyzed challenge documents and images

Worked for 2m 23s

Respuesta

I audited the evidence inside your IOT.zip, including the DOCX reports and the supporting screenshots. Your technical work is mostly solid, but there are two answers I would change before submitting, plus two challenges where the stated answer-format template conflicts with the actual evidence.

Final audit

ChallengeEvidence-based answerRequired formatResult
1365536NNNNN✅ Correct
14BlackfinXxxxxxxx✅ Correct
15Linux 2.6.26.5Xxxxx N.N.NN.N✅ Correct
16XZXXX⚠️ Evidence correct; format appears inconsistent
170xD8232CNxNNxNNN❌ Change your current answer
18192.168.0.60NNN.NNN.N.NN✅ Correct
19v1.21.1xN.NN.N❌ Add the leading v
204.3.1N.N.N✅ Correct
21JFFS2XXXXN✅ Correct
227754752NNNNNNN✅ Correct
230xE0080NxXNNNN✅ Correct
24passwdxxxxxx✅ Correct
25WNDR3800XXXXNXXX⚠️ Evidence correct; format appears inconsistent

The two answers you should definitely fix

Challenge 17

Your report currently ends up with:

Dx82x32C

I would not submit that.

Your own screenshot proves:

text
14164780 0xD8232C xz compressed data

You also independently ran:

text
printf '0x%x\n' 14164780

and obtained:

text
0xd8232c

Therefore the actual offset is unequivocally:

0xD8232C

Dx82x32C was created by artificially rearranging the value to imitate the provided format. An offset should never be rewritten that way.

Challenge 17: 0xD8232C

The displayed NxNNxNNN template itself appears inconsistent with the hexadecimal offset. The natural format for this answer would have been something like NxXNNNxX for 0xD8232C.


Challenge 19

Your evidence contains the BusyBox string:

text
BusyBox v1.21.1--LSDK-10.2-00082-4

Your report currently reduces this to:

1.21.1

Technically that is the numerical BusyBox version, but look carefully at the challenge's required format:

text
xN.NN.N

That precisely matches:

text
v1.21.1
  • v = lowercase character
  • 1
  • .
  • 21
  • .
  • 1

So for the actual answer field, I would use:

Challenge 19: v1.21.1

This is one of the most important corrections in your set.


Challenge 16 — your evidence is right, but the format looks wrong

You proved that offset 0x813682 begins with:

text
FD 37 7A 58 5A 00

That is the XZ magic signature.

Binwalk also reports:

text
8468098 0x813682 xz compressed data

So the file format is unquestionably:

XZ

The problem is that the question says:

text
Answer format: XXX

which implies three uppercase letters. There is no legitimate reason to turn XZ into a made-up three-character answer.

Do not submit things such as XZZ, XZC, etc.

Challenge 16: XZ

I would treat the XXX template as a likely formatting mistake in the challenge.


Challenge 25 — evidence strongly supports WNDR3800

Your screenshot contains many explicit strings such as:

text
NETGEAR Router WNDR3800

and your search directly returns:

text
WNDR3800

So the device identification is very strong:

WNDR3800

The only problem is the supplied format:

text
XXXXNXXX

WNDR3800 is actually:

text
XXXXNNNN WNDR3800

Again, I would not modify the actual device model just to force it into a faulty template. Your evidence repeatedly identifies the model as WNDR3800.

Challenge 25: WNDR3800


Verification of the remaining answers

Challenge 13 — 65536 ✅
Your Binwalk evidence reports:

text
Squashfs filesystem blocksize: 65536 bytes

Exactly five digits as required.

Challenge 14 — Blackfin ✅
The firmware is identified as:

text
Linux/Blackfin

And Blackfin matches Xxxxxxxx exactly.

Challenge 15 — Linux 2.6.26.5 ✅
The embedded kernel name is:

text
Linux-2.6.26.5-ADI-2009R1-pre-gd

The required format is satisfied exactly by:

Linux 2.6.26.5

Challenge 18 — 192.168.0.60 ✅
Your extracted database evidence associates DSP-W215 with:

192.168.0.60

It also exactly matches NNN.NNN.N.NN.

Challenge 20 — 4.3.1 ✅
Your extracted kernel strings explicitly contain:

text
gcc version 4.3.1

So:

4.3.1

Challenge 21 — JFFS2 ✅
Binwalk reports:

text
7077888 0x6C0000 JFFS2 filesystem, little endian

JFFS2 perfectly matches XXXXN.

Challenge 22 — 7754752 ✅
stat -c '%s' FileOne.bin produced:

text
7754752

Exactly seven digits.

Challenge 23 — 0xE0080 ✅
Binwalk reports:

text
917632 0xE0080 Squashfs filesystem

This one is particularly nice because it matches the requested format exactly:

text
N x X NNNN 0 x E 0080

So:

0xE0080

Challenge 24 — passwd ✅
Your extracted IOT6 filesystem includes the credential hash in the passwd file. Your screenshot shows an entry such as:

text
admin:$1$...:0:0:root:/:/bin/sh

So passwd is consistent with both the evidence and the six-lowercase-character answer format.


Submission list I recommend

text
Challenge 13: 65536 Challenge 14: Blackfin Challenge 15: Linux 2.6.26.5 Challenge 16: XZ Challenge 17: 0xD8232C Challenge 18: 192.168.0.60 Challenge 19: v1.21.1 Challenge 20: 4.3.1 Challenge 21: JFFS2 Challenge 22: 7754752 Challenge 23: 0xE0080 Challenge 24: passwd Challenge 25: WNDR3800

So the main takeaway is: change Challenge 17 from Dx82x32C → 0xD8232C, and Challenge 19 from 1.21.1 → v1.21.1. Challenges 16 and 25 have strong evidence for your answers, but the answer-format strings supplied in the question appear inconsistent with those values.

Compartir este Q&A