根据我的科研计划书设计技术路线图如何设计?

Erstellt am: 25. Dezember 2025

Beantwortet mit GPT-5.2 Pro von Chat01

Frage

模板8-科研计划书.docx

根据我的科研计划书设计技术路线图如何设计?

Gedanke

Designing the roadmap

I’m thinking through a technical route map for JAK2V617F project. It’ll have phases like hypothesis, phenotype, mechanism, intervention, and translation. Modeling, assays, and interventions will be included.

Laying out the plan

I’m gathering key steps: creating bone marrow chimera, inducing atherosclerosis, focusing on phenotypic, mechanistic, and translation aims, integrating data, assessing risks, and preparing output figures and diagrams.

Weighing editable slide

Considering creating an editable PPT slide with a flowchart for the route map. This approach aligns well with showing detailed steps clearly.

OK, let me see. The document has 24 paragraphs, and the "file_search" output is extensive, likely containing additional lines, possibly from tables. Accessing paragraph-by-paragraph could streamline the process.

Evaluating table strategy

I'm thinking through parsing tables with many cells, curious about their utility and structure.

Extracting main content
I'm mapping out the text extraction from two tables for the full plan. This involves pinpointing key data points and ensuring clarity for the next steps.

Breaking down the table
I’m digging into extracting the text from each cell of Table 1, considering it's the most comprehensive one.

Examining table details

Three large rows are present in table 1, each containing a focus area. Progressing through each section for a comprehensive review.

Mapping technical tasks

I’m breaking down a technical route map to outline research objectives, experimental steps, and anticipated outcomes. Planning includes drafting a flowchart or creating a vector PDF.

Mapping the technical route

I’m crafting a mermaid flowchart to outline research tasks and outcomes, focusing on model construction, phenotype analysis, mechanism exploration, intervention verification, and key output synthesis.

Charting the course

OK, let me see. The route map will highlight key models, mechanisms, interventions, and sample specifics. Design elements will be crafted for visual clarity, focusing on important discoveries.

Weighing options
I’m examining using helpers or pptxgenjs, considering a skill.md for slides, and consulting code.js to understand usage.

Assembling the image.js

Implementing in Node

I’m thinking through the slide layout, using Node.js and pptxgenjs for shapes, titles, and boxes with arrows for a structured design.

Verifying file integrity

Opened the file to confirm if the patch was indeed truncated. Progress is steady and intriguing to see.

Tracing file origins

OK, I’m thinking about the "make_tech_roadmap_ppt.js" file location. It seems to be created in the root of the current repository, given the absence of a specified path. Hm, that’s interesting.

Assessing the file structure
I’m checking the JavaScript file's location in the root directory to understand its contents effectively.

Piecing together the process

I’m mapping out the steps to generate the PowerPoint file, ensuring the path and file are accurately referenced.

Confirming file location
I'm checking to ensure the PPT file is where it should be.

Rendering slides

I'm thinking through the best way to transform slide content into images, considering visual clarity and aesthetics. Using render_slides.py to achieve this.

Verifying image content

OK, let me see. Checking the rendered PNG file for accuracy.

Verifying directory content

OK, let me see. Listing files to confirm valid paths and check for non-ASCII characters.

Examining the image

Adjusting layout and aligning elements

I'm adjusting slide layout to prevent breaks, tweaking bullet points for clear communication, and ensuring accessibility of the PNG file for quick setup.

Possibility presentation

I’m thinking about swim lanes to differentiate animal, cell, and human studies, with two versions for clarity. Also, including a disclaimer to avoid medical advice and providing a download link for the PPT.

Reasoned for 13m 24s

Antwort

你这份计划书的“技术路线图”,核心不是把方法罗列一遍,而是把因果链条和**三段式研究目标(表型→机制→干预/转化)**用一张图讲清楚:
JAK2V617F(克隆造血/CHIP) → 中性粒细胞mTOR–HIF‑1α异常激活 → 脂质代谢重编程 → NETosis/内皮互作增强 → 斑块炎症放大与不稳定/血栓风险↑;mTOR/HIF干预可逆转。 (模板8-科研计划书.docx)

下面给你一套“怎么画”的方法 + 一张已经按你内容做好的可编辑路线图模板(PPT,可直接复制进Word/PDF)。


1)技术路线图建议长什么样(最推荐的结构)

从左到右的流水线(或从上到下的逻辑链)最清晰,建议固定 5 个模块:

  1. 模型构建(输入/平台)
  2. 目标1:表型解析(现象与关键结局)
  3. 目标2:机制解析(通路→代谢→功能的因果证据)
  4. 目标3:干预与转化(体内+体外/Ex vivo验证“可逆性/靶点命中”)
  5. 预期输出(机制闭环 + 生物标志物 + 转化策略)

你计划书里已经天然是这个结构:研究内容1/2/3分别对应目标1/2/3,并且方法学非常丰富,画图时只需“收敛到关键读出”。


2)把你的内容“压缩成图”的做法(从长文到一张图)

A. 先写“主线一句话”(放在图最上方)

JAK2V617F 激活中性粒细胞 mTOR–HIF‑1α → 脂代谢重编程 → NETosis/内皮互作 → 动脉粥样硬化斑块进展与不稳定;雷帕霉素等可逆转。

B. 每个目标只留“3类信息”

每一栏(一个大框)建议只保留三行信息:

  • 样本/模型:用什么(Ldlr-/-+WTD、骨髓嵌合、20%模拟CHIP、人样本等)
  • 关键技术:用哪些平台(流式、IF/IHC、组学、活体显微镜、NETosis等)
  • 关键读出/结局:看什么(pS6/HIF‑1α、脂滴、NETs、斑块面积/坏死核/胶原帽)

这样评审一眼能看到:你不是“做很多实验”,而是“每一步都为因果链服务”。


3)按你课题定制的“一页总览技术路线图”(文字版,可直接照着画)

① 模型构建(输入/平台)

  • 供体:Mx1‑Cre;Jak2V617F + poly(I:C)诱导
  • 受体:WT 或 Ldlr‑/‑;建立全量嵌合20%嵌合(CHIP模拟)
  • 质控:嵌合率(CD45/GFP)、血常规(中性粒/血小板等协变量)
  • 诱导:WTD 7周形成粥样硬化(分组并行)

② 目标1:表型解析(“有没有、强不强、发生在什么时候”)

  • 斑块负担:全主动脉ORO + 主动脉根部切片(H&E/Masson/PSR)
  • 中性粒细胞浸润/炎症:Ly6G、MPO(IF/IHC);血浆炎症因子(ELISA)
  • 血小板‑白细胞互作:NPA/MPA(流式)
  • 内皮互作:活体显微镜(滚动/黏附)+ 剪切流黏附实验

③ 目标2:机制解析(“为什么——通路→代谢→功能”)

  • 通路:p‑S6/p‑4EBP1(Phosflow/IF)+ HIF‑1α核定位/表达
  • 代谢表型:脂滴(BODIPY)、脂肪酸摄取(BODIPY‑C16)、胆固醇(filipin)
  • 组学证据:中性粒细胞RNA‑seq + 脂质组/代谢组(必要时±¹³C示踪)
  • 功能输出:NETosis(SYTOX、CitH3、MPO‑DNA)、ROS、趋化/黏附

④ 目标3:干预与转化(“能不能逆转——靶点命中与结局改善”)

  • 体内干预:雷帕霉素抑制mTOR(±HIF通路调控对照)
  • 体外/Ex vivo:中性粒细胞短期药物处理,验证表型可逆与因果一致
  • 终点:斑块面积、坏死核心、胶原/纤维帽等稳定性指标 + 循环NETs/炎症因子
  • 安全性:体重、CBC、肝肾功能、感染事件监测

⑤ 输出(图最右边写“deliverables”)

  • 机制闭环:通路→代谢→功能→斑块结局
  • 生物标志物:pS6、HIF‑1α、脂滴/NETs指标(动物↔人群可对照)
  • 转化路径:雷帕霉素 target engagement(机制响应)→探索性临床研究依据

4)画图时评审最在意的 6 个“加分点”(你图里最好显式画出来)

  1. 对照组清晰:WT→Ldlr‑/‑ vs Jak2V617F→Ldlr‑/‑;干预组并行
  2. CHIP模拟突出:20%嵌合是你的亮点之一,建议在模型框里加粗/标色
  3. “因果验证”而不止“相关”:体外短期药物处理 + 体内干预形成“可逆性证据”
  4. 关键读出对齐假说:mTOR读出(pS6)+ HIF‑1α + 脂滴/脂质组 + NETs
  5. 多组学不是堆砌:把组学放在“机制”框里作为“证据层”,并在箭头上写“通路富集/GSEA/FDR”
  6. 质控贯穿全流程:随机化/盲法、同批检测、功效分析/多重校正(放在图底部横条最好)

5)我已经按你的计划书做了一张“可编辑技术路线图模板”

你可以直接下载,用PPT改字、删减、再导出PDF插入申请书。


6)如果你想自己用代码生成图(可选:Mermaid流程图)

把下面代码粘到支持Mermaid的编辑器里即可出图(再截图/导出SVG):

mermaid
flowchart LR H[科研假说:JAK2V617F→中性粒细胞mTOR–HIF‑1α→脂代谢重编程→NETosis→斑块不稳定/血栓] --> M subgraph M[① 模型构建] M1[供体:Mx1‑Cre;Jak2V617F + poly(I:C)] --> M2[骨髓移植→Ldlr‑/‑] M2 --> M3[全量嵌合 & 20%嵌合(CHIP模拟)] M3 --> M4[QC:CD45/GFP嵌合率 + CBC] M4 --> M5[WTD诱导粥样硬化] end M --> A1[② 目标1:表型解析] A1 --> P1[斑块:ORO铺片 + 根部切片(H&E/Masson/PSR)] A1 --> P2[浸润/炎症:Ly6G、MPO、Mac‑3;ELISA] A1 --> P3[NPA/MPA:流式] A1 --> P4[内皮互作:活体显微镜 + 剪切流黏附] A1 --> A2[③ 目标2:机制解析] A2 --> K1[通路:p‑S6/p‑4EBP1 + HIF‑1α核定位] A2 --> K2[代谢:脂滴/FA摄取/胆固醇;脂质组/代谢组±13C示踪] A2 --> K3[功能:NETosis、ROS、趋化/黏附] A2 --> A3[④ 目标3:干预与转化] A3 --> I1[体内:雷帕霉素抑制mTOR(±HIF调控)] A3 --> I2[体外/Ex vivo:短期处理验证可逆性] A3 --> I3[结局:斑块负担/坏死核心/胶原帽 + 炎症/NETs + 安全性] A3 --> O[⑤ 输出:机制闭环 + 生物标志物 + 转化策略]

如果你后续还想把“人群验证/探索性临床试验”单独画成第二张路线图(更像转化路径图:筛查→分层→生物标志物→target engagement),我也可以按你计划书的写法给你再配一张“临床转化路线图”版本(同样可编辑)。 (模板8-科研计划书.docx)

Diesen Q&A teilen