问题 1: （填空）根据规则，聊天框输入/+什么所执行的命令可以返回帖子顶楼？（仅回答准确的2个汉字...

Frage

问题 1: （填空）根据规则，聊天框输入/+什么所执行的命令可以返回帖子顶楼？（仅回答准确的2个汉字，不带斜杠）
问题 2: （单选）遇到非官方AI渠道使用问题时应该：（仅填写正确的答案字母，如：A）
A. 在聊天区请求其他成员协助
B. 请求角色卡或预设作者提供解决方案
C. 询问自己购买的渠道/供应商
D. 私信管理员寻求技术支持
问题 3: （单选）需要删除自己的帖子时，应该如何操作：（仅填写正确的答案字母，如：A）
A. @赛博公仆请求协助
B. 编辑标题为"已删"再删除首楼
C. 使用 /自助管理删除命令
D. @管理组请求协助
问题 4: （填空）在加入社区后的多少个月内触犯严重违规，将被直接永封？（仅回答1个阿拉伯数字）

Gedanke

Clarifying answers based on guidelines

For Q1, based on the rules and the provided answer page, the correct response is "回顶" for the command to return to the top of a post. For Q2, which asks about non-official AI channels, the answer is likely C. Users should reach out to their own vendor or channel for help. The answers seem consistent with what I found across different pages and guidelines, so I feel confident in filling in those blanks!

Resolving citation conflict

I'm considering the best way to handle citations while respecting the user's instruction for concise answers. The user asks for only the answer without extra text, so I'm worried that adding citations might cause an issue. I could try using a footnote or placing citations on separate lines after the answers, but that might still add unwanted extra content. The system says citations are necessary, so I need to find a balance—perhaps adding citations in markdown format could be less

Thought for 54 seconds

Antwort

回顶
C
C
1

chat01.ai

Frage

Gedanke

Clarifying answers based on guidelines

Resolving citation conflict

Antwort

Diesen Q&A teilen